DWQA Questions › Tag: conscienceFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesUnderstanding the “greater than normal need for stimulation” helps us make sense of the numerous stone images of the Anunnaki throughout the Middle East. Not only are they giants, averaging 12 to 15 feet tall, but all of them appeared exceptionally “athletic” and muscular. And possessing advanced medical capabilities that can replace even lost limbs and organs, this would give them license to engage in “extreme sports” including combat sports with each other. Is it safe to say the Anunnaki are “high-strung,” impatient with everything, and bore easily? This sounds like the LAST kind of being you would want “lording over you?” How much of their average day is spent working out? Are they all “obsessed bodybuilder gym rats?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society36 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, about sociopaths, “The intellectual difference between right and wrong does not bring on the emotional sirens and flashing blue lights, or the fear of God, that it does for the rest of us. Without the slightest blip of guilt or remorse, one in twenty-five people can do anything at all.” She further wrote, “The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or even gender.” “But as to what is possibly the single most meaningful characteristic that divides human species (and humans from extraterrestrials) – the presence or absence of conscience – we (humans) remain effectively oblivious.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society15 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “A good psychopath can play a concerto on anyone’s heart strings … Your best defense is to understand the nature of these human predators.” Does that naturally and rationally extend to the extraterrestrial predators as well, and that the number one way they “play on our heart strings” is through channeling directly to humans who share those words with the world? Is our best defense against Anunnaki psychics, our attempts to understand the nature of these extraterrestrial predators? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society22 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “It is crucial to note that all of the psychiatric diagnoses (including narcissism) involve some amount of personal distress or misery for the individuals who suffer from them.” “Sociopathy stands alone as a ‘disease’ that causes no dis-ease for the person who has it, no subjective discomfort. Sociopaths are often quite satisfied with themselves and with their lives, and perhaps for this very reason there is no effective treatment.” She also wrote, “We (humans) feel that if someone is bad, he should be burdened with the knowledge that he is bad. It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about himself.” And even though beings like the Anunnaki don’t feel guilt, do they still try to make each other aware of their awfulness? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society21 views0 answers0 votesDr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths are infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make, or for the outcomes of their decisions. In fact, a refusal to see the results of one’s bad behavior as having anything to do with oneself – ‘consistent irresponsibility’ in the language of the American Psychiatric Association – is a cornerstone of the antisocial personality diagnosis. People without conscience provide endless examples of such stunning ‘I’ve done nothing wrong’ statements. Instead, when confronted with a destructive outcome that is clearly their doing, they will say, plain and simple, ‘I never did that,’ and will to all appearances believe their own direct lie. This feature of sociopathy makes self-awareness impossible, and in the end, just as the sociopath has no genuine relationships with other people, he has only a very tenuous one with himself.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society18 views0 answers0 votesNothing says “Divine Level Problem” like “Sociopath.” The good news is, contrary to what most psychological professionals sincerely believe, that this is a noncorrectable problem, Creator has emphatically said the opposite—that it absolutely is correctible and it is up to humans to correct it. The missing ingredient, however, is “divine partnership.” Without it, the professionals are indeed correct in assuming the problem is not at all fixable. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support can be the means by which, eventually but not quickly, we humans, in partnership with the divine, can indeed correct the problem of sociopathy and the evil it causes throughout the universe, and for all of time?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Problems in Society20 views0 answers0 votes“Shame on you!” We’ve all heard it, and we’ve all said it. The Oxford Dictionary defines shame as both a feeling and an action, “a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behavior,” as well as, to “make (someone) feel ashamed.” Shame is a feeling nearly everyone everywhere tries to avoid, with the irony being that those most vulnerable to criticism are the ones most prone to overindulge in attempting to elicit that feeling in others. In some ways the dichotomy of shame is perhaps the most profound of hypocrisy litmus tests there is. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs165 views0 answers0 votesPavlov’s dog. If that term is unfamiliar to you, it is worth your time to get familiar with what it really means. Ivan Pavlov demonstrated a “conditioned response” in the dogs he used for experimentation. Some of these experiments were quite cruel and involved electric shocks to impair or elicit both involuntary physiological as well as behavioral responses. The act of shaming is actually a very similar paradigm, and it’s easy to imagine the one doing the shaming as having an electric shock button that they press to deliver a very uncomfortable at best, and excruciatingly painful at worst, emotional shock to the recipient’s consciousness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs145 views0 answers0 votesShaming is not isolated to humans. An acquaintance has a five-year-old beagle who has an undesirable habit of urinating on the hardwood floor if not put outside on a timely basis. The dog has been trained entirely through rewards and only verbal shaming as punishment. But the effect of shaming can be quite profound. The dog knows that urinating inside the house is undesirable behavior and displeasing to the humans in the house, so the dog makes sure no one is watching when she goes. As an adult dog, she has never been caught in the act. One recent morning this acquaintance found the all too familiar puddle on the floor and turned to the dog right behind them, pointed to the puddle, and said, “No,” just, “No.” Not loud or even conveying much in the way of emotion, just enough to communicate displeasure. The response of the dog was rather extreme—tail between her legs and she wandered off to hide under the raised footrest of a recliner for a few minutes “until the coast was clear.” The acquaintance was a bit “taken aback” at the profound effect of a simple, “No.” This person does not shame the dog very often, and that may be one explanation for the exaggerated effect. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs189 views0 answers0 votesThe feeling of shame is associated with the “conscience” of a person. In fact, the very existence of this phenomenon is one of the most persuasive arguments there is for the existence of the divine. It’s hard to take the “conscience” for granted. Unfortunately, we have learned that the feeling of shame is a rather crude form of messaging that can be delivered from multiple sources, some benevolent and some malevolent. Presumably, it can come from the higher self, guides and guardians, and even Creator. It can also be triggered by the deep subconscious, cellular memory, spirit attachments, and perhaps most alarmingly of all, the interlopers—fallen angelics and extraterrestrials. Figuring out both the origin and relevancy of feelings of shame is one of the most profound challenges every human being faces. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs210 views0 answers0 votesShaming seems to be the very root of much political discourse, with one side attempting to shame the other side. The negative effect of all this is that people eventually get cynical about all political discourse and will shy away from it altogether. It’s even more discouraging when the ones doing the most shaming are also the most hypocritical, and the most guilty of the behavior they are shaming the other side for. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs177 views0 answers0 votesDefiance is the act of resisting shaming. The middle finger salute came about as it was common practice in the Middle Ages to cut off the middle finger of captured soldiers, as this finger was necessary for effective archery. Soldiers would come to taunt their enemies by showing them from across the battlefield that they still had their middle fingers. Today this gesture is widely used to communicate, “I reject your efforts to shame me.” As humans are prone to go too far in utilizing compensatory behaviors like this, we often end up rejecting more criticism and shaming in ways that are unwise. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs165 views0 answers0 votesIt’s bad enough when the genesis of shame is others, but it can be even more insidious when the source of shame is the self. This can result in severe depression, withdrawal, and even suicide. It can even be embraced to the extent that the person fights off those attempting to counteract and heal their shame. The term “hugging your cactus” seems quite on target. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs167 views0 answers0 votesThe Battle of the Sexes can be sometimes downright comical and often involves nearly futile attempts to shame the other gender that simply don’t work. We see this when women frequently criticize men for “not asking for directions” and men almost universally just “laugh it off.” Most men are quite literally shameless when it comes to this behavior. Likewise, many, if not most women, cannot be effectively shamed for taking too long in the bathroom, and ignore such shaming attempts as, “Oh, just so much noise,” often increasing the frustration levels of the partner. More than one divorce ultimately results from these disparities. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs142 views0 answers0 votesShaming can be seen as an assault on another person’s belief system. The one doing the shaming is trying to demonstrate that the belief being challenged is false or deficient in some way. This can be where there is power in numbers, and the more people that can be enlisted in joining the one attempting to shame, the more profound the shame actually experienced by the recipient can be. It’s not an exaggeration that profound public shaming and embarrassment can lead to both suicide and homicide. And while psychopaths are said to lack a conscience, shaming one publicly might be the last thing you ever do. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Limiting Beliefs127 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola