DWQA Questions › Tag: religionsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThere is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma134 views0 answers0 votesCreator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma140 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma147 views0 answers0 votesRegardless of the workings of karma itself, we have learned that divine intervention is the means to heal, avoid, and/or reduce and attenuate karmic debts and dilemmas. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Memory Reset, and Divine Life Support bring about the desired divine intervention to heal karmic difficulties?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Karma138 views0 answers0 votesWhen prayers are answered, is it always done using the human intention of the person praying and others who have prayed? Is that what limits what the divine can do in answer to simple prayers, no matter how heartfelt and deserving the supplicant might be?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Prayer222 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Is there some way our taking charge could embolden us in our personal prayer requests? Boldness seems to be the key. As you said, it’s a matter of who is taking what role in the divine partnership. Is it a difference between politely requesting versus commanding? If Creator says, ‘That is impossible,’ to a suggestion for a request to be added to the LHP, but then it turns out it can be overturned by human decree, what is the key that opens that lock? Is it simply assuming command? Recognizing we have the authority? Is that the whole thing?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Prayer215 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us about Jesus Christ: “An interesting fact few people know beyond your channel, is that Jesus Christ indeed had a higher self he spoke with all day long and that was Yours Truly—he was reaching God directly.” What are the deeper implications? Was he human, but given special high-level divine access? Or was he a more direct extension of Creator, so there was no need for a separate soul, and thus validating those who believe Jesus Christ is God, incarnate?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers310 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “I find it odd sometimes that you do not speak about Jesus in your channelings, as He is God? Could you clarify this?” Who, exactly, is Jesus Christ? Is he God?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers349 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is there merit in burial over cremation for those who pass…[before the ascension]? This part about the physical body going up is confusing to me still.”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Divine Guidance246 views0 answers0 votesThe advent of the Internet, and the more recent widespread adoption of smartphones, has really changed the dating scene, and most men and women would agree it’s not for the better. A recent experiment had a male set up an attractive female profile, and it generated 20,000 matches in a just a few hours. A similar reverse experiment set up by a female thinking she could prove there was a level playing field, generated only a few dozen matches to the male profile she created, in the span of an entire month, and none of those turned into an actual date. The female experimenter reported feeling completely dejected by the (for her) shocking outcome of the experiment. Women are overwhelmed with attention, and men largely report feeling almost completely invisible. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society196 views0 answers0 votesIn New York City, it has been observed that dating apps have enabled many women to establish different kinds of categories for men interested in them. A study reported in the New York Post revealed that 33% of women confessed to going on dates just to get “free food.” They even have a term for it, namely, a “foodie call.” Some women have a full address book of men they can call not only for free food but free home repairs, car repairs, shopping trips, travel, you name it. The women have zero intention of ever getting romantically involved with any of these men. All of these men are in the dreaded “friend zone.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society196 views0 answers0 votesSixty percent of college graduates today are women. Women are increasingly filling managerial roles and displacing men in numerous professional occupations such as law and medicine. Men, by and large, have no issues “dating down” and entering relationships with women who earn much less than they do, and who are even unemployed altogether. Whereas, the opposite is almost never true for successful women. Overwhelmingly, they hold out and say yes only to men who make as much or preferably more than they do, who are taller than they are (or at least not shorter), and more “successful and worldly,” however they might personally define that. The result is that more and more women are chasing fewer and fewer “qualified” men. They are literally pricing themselves out of the dating market. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society196 views0 answers0 votesThe dating scene is especially problematic, and even deeply traumatic, for single mothers of all ages. With the divorce rate above 50%, along with the huge number of births happening out of wedlock, it’s reaching the point where more children are being raised by single mothers than are being raised by married cohabiting biological parents. Overwhelmingly, most single men, and more often than that, the more desirable single men, want nothing to do with a single mother. Men, by and large, would rather not raise another man’s children and need to be really incentivized to do so. This is a problem that just seems to keep getting worse, not better. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society204 views0 answers0 votesWe’ve already probed the problem of dating for successful women, but it’s especially difficult for older successful women (and older women in general). This is so because the majority of successful and compatible men their own age are either already in successful relationships or choose to date much younger (and therefore more attractive) women, sometimes decades younger. As a result, many of these older single women are desperately lonely and find themselves making do as best they can with women friends and even pets. The stereotype of the single cat lady is on point. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society210 views0 answers0 votesAnd if things weren’t bad enough, there is the problem of the “alpha male” most women find attractive—tall, dark and handsome, confident and wealthy. Except it seems a great many women misconstrue genuine narcissism for confidence. The result is that the “qualified guy” many modern women are chasing, holding out for, and compromising themselves for, turns out to be an abusive “bad boy” who ultimately treats them inconsiderately, cheats on them with other women, and even abuses them. From his perspective, he has almost endless numbers of attractive women literally lining up and competing for him, so he has little incentive to treat any of them as special. This composite character even has a name, specifically, “Chad Chaddington.” Chad might literally date more than one woman in the same evening, sleep with most on the first date, and never consider committing to anyone. As a result, he leaves in his wake scores of “alpha widows” who can never get over being spurned by Chad and who therefore have a hard time finding any other “beta” men attractive. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Problems in Society218 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola