DWQA Questions › Category: Problems in SocietyFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAn editorial in Scientific American stated: “As we become more reliant on AI for our jobs, what will happen to our skills? Early studies suggest that professional abilities can quickly erode as AI is integrated into workplaces. So-called de-skilling is a growing concern for medical specialists, computer scientists and other workers. Seventy percent of nurses and 77 percent of physicians, for example, are worried about losing their skills because of over-reliance on AI systems, according to a June survey of U.S. health care workers.” Two examples: The first example of over-reliance on AI systems was discussed in the medical field where scientists performed a study of physicians in Poland who specialize in endoscopy. Doctors who had each performed at least 2,000 colonoscopies during their career were given access to an AI system that analyzes colonoscopy images in real-time and flags pre-cancerous lesions. During the three-month period before the AI tool was introduced, the specialists found at least one adenoma during 28.4 percent of colonoscopies. During the three-month period after the tool was introduced, the adenoma detection rate for colonoscopies performed without AI assistance decreased to 22.4 percent.ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society48 views0 answers0 votesA second example of over-reliance on AI systems was discussed in the computer science field where the AI company Anthropic designed a randomized controlled trial in which 52 software engineers were asked to perform a basic coding task. During the exercise, all 52 participants could search the web and access instructions on how to do the task. Half of the participants were prompted to use an AI assistant as well. After the task, participants were quizzed on the task they had just completed. The AI-assisted participants did significantly worse on the quiz than those who hadn’t used AI: the average score was 50 percent in the AI group versus 67 percent in the non-AI group.ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society47 views0 answers0 votesWhat the experts say: “To prevent AI-driven skill erosion, people need to be aware of how much they are offloading to generative AI tools,” says Tapani Rinta-Kahila, an information-systems researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki. “People need to manage the competing dynamics of relying on generative AI and staying mindfully vigilant.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society42 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A tension in modern life is between achievement versus leisure, between two ways of relating to time—living as though true meaning and value are located in a future time and state that must be earned by jumping through hoops and being seen to be busy and important versus living as though meaning must be present in day-to-day living, because the future is uncertain and the self changes. The first orientation excels at building societies and careers. The second protects against reaching a summit only to discover you spent decades climbing a mountain you never actually chose or valued. What is the divine way to reconcile this tension across a lifetime?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society52 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “A July 2026 article in a neuroscience website reporting on several large studies suggests that average Intelligence Quotient (IQ, standardized tests built to measure specific cognitive skills) scores among younger cohorts have flattened or slightly declined after nearly a century of steady gains. They say multiple national datasets show IQ score gains slowing or reversing in cohorts born after the 1990s, following roughly a century of steady increases. Is this mainly due to heavy reliance on search engines and constant online connectivity reshaping how the brain allocates attention and stores information? Is this a major threat to human thinking ability or a short-term moral panic?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society41 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Research from MIT in June 2025, “Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task,” by Nataliya Kosmyna et al., examined the effects of using ChatGPT to write essays. Using electroencephalograms (EEGs), they recorded each participant’s brain activity. ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.” They also retained less information from the essays that were written. It seems that reliance on AI systems impairs cognitive processes underlying independent thinking (People who didn’t use ChatGPT had higher engagement and performed better). Does reliance upon large language models (LLMs) jeopardize long-term brain development by altering the brain’s neural networks?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Problems in Society30 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I have become concerned over how excessive information being streamed/broadcast/shared is fogging my sense of being human. One author that clarifies this concern is Neil Postman and his book, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. He defines “Technopoly” as a society that deifies technology, surrendering its culture, traditions, and human values to the authority of technology. He suggests that resisting this takeover requires a conscious effort to preserve and value non-technological sources of meaning: religion, art, philosophy, tradition etc. Is his analysis and remedy correct? How essential is it to disconnect from the “technoculture” of interconnected devices?”ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Problems in Society60 views0 answers0 votesRecent studies of creative writing confirm use of Artificial Intelligence leads to sameness, not innovation, as in the work of K. Moon, et al., “Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diversity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing.” [Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 6 (2025) 100207]. A previous study of 370,000 personal statements from college applicants also showed that those essays prepared with ChatGPT used more diverse and colorful language, but lacked truly creative ideas. The data revealed a two to eightfold greater number of creative ideas when humans worked alone than when working with AI. Is that an accurate analysis? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Problems in Society50 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us that promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) was used as a cover to aid foreign infiltration into the US and other nations. What about the push for open borders, or at least generous acceptance of migrants? In the US, it is blamed on the Democratic Party wanting more voters, but Europe and the UK have allowed large influxes of foreign migrants as well. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Problems in Society68 views0 answers0 votesScientific American reported a mathematical advance done through Artificial Intelligence: “After 80 years of struggle by human mathematicians with nothing to show, a chatbot has solved a major geometry conjecture, called the “unit distance” problem. The company OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, announced the result yesterday, together with comments from a number of experts, who declared the artificial intelligence’s method “clever” and “elegant.” Chatbots have made some achievements in math in recent months, but this marks a true milestone that would warrant being published in a mathematics journal if humans had achieved it.” Was there any surreptitious assistance given by extraterrestrial AI systems to help the human platform achieve this?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Problems in Society64 views0 answers0 votesA viewers asks about the recent channeling discussing apparent anti-Semitism programming befalling popular conservative commentators Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens: “… There is a lot of evidence produced not only by these commentators but many others as well, as to the nefarious deeds and deceptions done by Zionists and the military industrial complex types. I have no doubt the ‘Jews’ are being made to be the obvious villains by most, if not all of the world, and this is indeed by design IMO. But maybe pointing out how the Jewish people themselves have been manipulated for centuries by the interlopers to perform deceptions and misdeeds to their neighbors to eventually help create this narrative of popular opinion turning against them, would go a long way to reveal the overall deception here, and that NO group is innocent or free from manipulation from our space-faring puppeteers. I have no desire to point any fingers at the Jewish people in any way, but I think it is important to see that they too are having their strings pulled. Maybe even more so than most. I can only imagine the enemies they made by not only spawning Moses, but also Jesus Christ himself. So they may very well be at the top of the ET’s hit list.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society136 views0 answers0 votesI have been agonizing over the issue some Get Wisdom followers have raised in their concerns about me seeming to have a pro-Israeli bias, simply for asking about the strange anti-Israel and anti-Semitic shift in perspectives by Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens which others have pointed out. And they want me to present more criticisms of the war in Gaza. It seems to me that, as usual, the Jews are a tiny minority once again being criticized by most of the world. I am reluctant to pile on condemnation of the Israeli war on Gaza without detailing the brutality of their provocation by Hamas in orchestrating the October 7, 2023 slaughter of about 1,200 Israeli civilians—men, women and children—not to mention, kidnapping and years-long torture of about 240 hostages taken back to Gaza and imprisoned. Now that the “Civil Commission Report on Oct 7th Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children” has been issued, the current lopsided anti-Israeli sentiment seems to cry out for Israeli support. What is the best way for me to handle these conflicting needs in serving Get Wisdom and the Cause of the Divine? I don’t want to stir a hornet’s nest that only causes more damage.ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society144 views0 answers0 votesYou have said to us many times that the interlopers are carrying out a Trojan Horse maneuver to deceive us in representing themselves as benevolent white-hat ETs who are here to help save us from the black-hat variety who have infiltrated our world. Is the current rollout and escalation of the mad dash to create ever-more-powerful AI systems, in effect, a Trojan Horse bringing a kind of false-hope with alien encouragement that will ultimately backfire, causing damage and economic losses from within our own infrastructure?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society97 views0 answers0 votesRecent channeling to probe a client’s business plans, which rely heavily on Artificial Intelligence support and implementation, were pessimistic about things working out. Was this an objective assessment?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society65 views0 answers0 votesThe concerns raised about vulnerability of internal Artificial Intelligence systems to being breached and corrupted, even the surreptitious creation of a back door allowing unfettered interloper access, would seem to predict likelihood of things going wrong, inevitably, and quite possibly to a catastrophic degree. Is this going to be seen almost universally across industries that have embraced and depend on AI for their infrastructure? Is that the plan? What is most important for us to know?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Problems in Society75 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola