DWQA Questions › Tag: 7-24-25
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
You told us in a channeling that in about 80% of periodontal disease cases, the chronic gingivitis is actually caused by a virus, and a search of the literature turned up some scientific support of viral involvement in that disorder. A paper by M. Kazi, et al. (J. Clin. Diag. Res., 2015 Jul, Vol-9(7): DC05-DC08) describes that among 75 patients with periodontitis, 81.33% as a group had detectable HSV-1, HSV-2, Epstein-Barr virus, or cytomegalovirus. Although scientifically, this is only showing an association of virus presence, is this actually reflecting true causation of the illness for those patients?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
A number of studies have shown that Berberine has anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antiviral activity. It inhibits replication of herpes simplex virus, human cytomegalovirus, human papillomavirus, and human immunodeficiency virus. Would taking Nutreb’s berberine supplement containing 1200mg of 98% pure berberine hydrochloride (HCl) with added BioPerine for 5X higher absorption confer meaningful antiviral benefits?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
How safe and effective for joint problems is the supplement OmegaXL offered by Great Healthworks, which has 300 mg of a Proprietary Blend of Green-Lipped Mussel (Perna canaliculus) Oil Extract (PCSO-524®) containing Omega Fatty Acids, Extra Virgin Olive Oil, Pure Olive Oil, and d-alpha Tocopherol (Vitamin E)?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
A number of research studies have been called into question because of poor reproducibility when an attempt to replicate their findings failed. A “replication crisis” has been noted for psychology, sociology, education, economics, and medical research. For example, a detailed inquiry was mounted to replicate 193 experiments from 53 top cancer papers published from 2010-2012. Only a quarter of the original findings were able to be reproduced. Moreover, even for effects that were reproduced, the magnitude averaged 85% less than observed in the original investigations. This is concerning because such experiments are crucial for deciding what to pursue for drug development and when to proceed to clinical trials. Unreliable results not only waste money but expose patients to unnecessary risks. While there are many understandable reasons why results can vary, what can Creator tell us about hidden reasons for such poor reproducibility and their impact on the reliability of scientific inquiry?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
Ask Question