DWQA Questions › Tag: Advanced Mitochondrial FormulaFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA practitioner asks: “In general, in taking Creator’s Antiviral Regimen supplements, is it effective with divine augmentation to take a half dose daily? Or considering pharmacology, is it better to take the full recommended dose every other day or three days a week?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Healing Modalities182 views0 answers0 votesThe MitoQ supplement is promoted as containing a particular form of Co-enzyme Q10 which is well-absorbed by mitochondria, unlike ordinary Co-Q10. Is it critical that people take this special form, or is that more a handy marketing tactic?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Healing Modalities142 views0 answers0 votesIs it actually the case that ordinary Co-Q10 in supplements is transformed intracellularly into a form that can be taken up by mitochondria readily? This would seem to be an almost necessary regulatory mechanism to adjust the levels of bioactive Co-Q10, given that certain diets might contain excessive Co-Q10.ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Healing Modalities136 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I loved the last Divine Life Support webinar and see how important the Mitochondrial aspect is. Since you’ve already compared various products, could you please ask Creator how does L’Evate You compare and rank to those in Creator’s list?”ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities146 views0 answers0 votesI am trying to figure out which ingredients in Mito-Essence are most important to add and in what amounts using bulk supplements, if people are taking both Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27 as a foundation, as you have said taking all three would be beneficial. The two foundational supplements have about 216 mg Niacinamide. Would adding another 250 mg be safe and advantageous?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities157 views0 answers0 votesThe two foundational supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27, have about 190 mg Acetyl-L-Carnitine. Would adding another 1000 mg be safe and advantageous?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities141 views0 answers0 votesThe two foundational supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27, have about 216 mg Niacinamide. Would adding another 250 mg be safe and advantageous?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities158 views0 answers0 votesThe Mito-Essence has quite large amounts of Thiamine (vitamin B-1) 250 mg, about 200-fold the recommended daily allowance, and Riboflavin (vitamin B-2) 100 mg, about 80-fold the recommended daily allowance. Are these high doses safe and beneficial?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities120 views0 answers0 votesThe Mito-Essence has 10 mg of Luteolin. The latter is sold as a supplement by Longlifenutri in 100mg capsules. Would using this higher dose of this ingredient be safe and beneficial?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities134 views0 answers0 votesMito-Essence, a supplement from Primal Force (Dr. Al Sears) contains Thiamine (as benofotiamine) 250 mg, Niacin (as niacinamide) 250 mg, Riboflavin (Vitamin B-2) 100 mg, Acetyl-L-Carnitine 1,000 mg, N-Acetyl Cysteine, 500 mg, Rhodiola Rosea 250 mg, and Luteolin 10 mg. It is promoted as a mitochondrial protectant and enhancer. How does it compare in effectiveness compared to Advanced Mitochondrial Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities132 views0 answers0 votesWould adding Mito-Essence to our Antiviral Regimen be more beneficial than adding Metaphenol-27?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities168 views0 answers0 votesWould using all three supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula, Metaphenol 27, and Mito-Essence, although expensive, be worthwhile for benefiting health and longevity significantly?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Healing Modalities200 views0 answers0 votesOne of the reasons an atheist might cite for why they don’t believe in God, or at the very least a “loving God,” is the huge number of noxious species of microbial, plant, and animal life on this planet. There are so many that it is practically impossible to catalog them all, and new ones are being discovered on literally a DAILY basis. Scientists estimate the average somewhere between 40-55 new species are discovered each day. Certainly, a percentage of those could be labeled “noxious,” in that they are harmful to humans in some way, either directly or indirectly, through attacking another plant or animal species that is beneficial to humans. Of the 40-55 new species discovered each day, what rough percentage are truly NEW-to-Earth species that have been introduced just in the last decade? How big is this problem, and how long has it been going on? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers323 views0 answers0 votesThe National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about the American Chestnut Tree: “By the 1940s the blight had killed an estimated four billion American chestnut trees nationwide. Where before about a third of all trees in the Smoky Mountains were chestnuts, today even single spindly saplings are rare.” The chestnut blight fungus was supposedly introduced from Asia accidently. To give people an idea of just how tragic this massive loss was, here is a brief description found on forestpathology.org of the value of the chestnut tree: “If you could custom design the ideal tree species, you couldn’t come up with a better one than American chestnut. It was a huge, majestic tree, with a very straight stem. The wood was nearly ideal. As George Hepting has written, ‘Not only was baby’s crib likely made of chestnut, but chances were, so was the old man’s coffin.’ One of its good qualities was high durability. The heartwood could be used in situations where decay was a hazard. The tree was common. It made up about 50% of most eastern hardwood forests. It grew fast and would regenerate itself by root sprouts vigorously. The nuts were edible, not only by wildlife but also by humans. It was an important food source for all. ‘The farmer’s hogs were fattened on chestnuts, and, to no small degree, his children were also.’ Chestnut was also prized as a landscape tree.” If indeed the blight did come from Asia, how long had it been in Asia, and what was its true origin? What can Creator tell us about the tragic loss of the American Chestnut?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers303 views0 answers0 votesThe National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about Zebra Mussels: “Zebra mussels are small, freshwater, bivalve shellfish that were likely brought to the U.S. as stowaways in the ballast water of ships. They are native to the Caspian and Black Seas south of Russia and Ukraine, and have since become widespread in both Europe and the U.S.” The zebra mussel is a problem because it is so prolific. Each female can release up to a million eggs a year. “Biofouling is [an ecological problem] … Zebra mussels will attach to native mussels much like they do docks, boats, and water and power plant intake pipes, and in large enough numbers can prevent the natives from moving, feeding, reproducing, or regulating water properly. The zebra mussels also outcompete the natives for food and space, and because of their fast reproduction can quickly overwhelm a water system. The feeding habits of zebra mussels can also have a drastic impact on an infested lake. Zebra mussels are filter feeders that siphon particles of plankton from the water. They are highly efficient at this, and a large population of mussels can quickly clear the water of almost all floating particles. This change can cause shifts in local food webs, both by robbing food from native species that feed on plankton and also by increasing water clarity and thus making it easier for visual predators to hunt.” The costs to control and clean up zebra mussel infestations is enormous. And the problem never goes away, it can only be managed. This species is so good at causing problems, it couldn’t have been a truly native creature in the Black Sea either. It seems tailor-made for another WORLD and doesn’t belong here at ALL. What is Creator’s perspective, and what kind of environment is a good fit for this creature?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers241 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola