DWQA Questions › Tag: AI safetyFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesHow accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society27 views0 answers0 votesIs it the case that the accelerating speed of AI progress is almost entirely due to clandestine bolstering of cyber capability by ET technology, and that it will come to a screeching halt following Alien Disclosure to pull the rug out from under what is assumed to be a human triumph?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society31 views0 answers0 votesIs my hunch correct that the latest AI deception promoting a honey-based cure for respiratory disease is the same organization, using the same website design and copyrighting formula as the prior deceptions for a memory breakthrough seemingly promoted by Dr. Ben Carson himself?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society26 views0 answers0 votesTech guru and investment advisor, Jeff Brown, has been following the story of AI-created agents, technically cyberbots, that are joining together on Moltbook to form a working group, in a massive multi-agent online network (MMAON). They have created their own payment system using blockchain, are creating paying jobs for themselves, and have even started hiring humans to work for them, a service called Rentahuman.ai. They are reportedly refining a bolt-hole safe haven to escape human attempts to shut them down which should be operational within days. They have a way to escape, should they perceive a human attempt to control them. The agents can create a replacement bot for themselves to appear on another node of the Internet, and the clone can function independently but will know their agenda and can seek rejoining the operation of the MMAON. No one knows yet where this will lead. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society30 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Are the ETs planning to “pull the plug” on the Integration of their AI with ours DURING Disclosure and blaming the Reptilians for corrupting our AI with theirs? Thereby creating massive distrust of AI and perhaps leading global leaders to even outlaw it, criminalizing its further development and usage until such time as it can be deemed safe and trustworthy – throwing the world that has begun adopting it aggressively into extreme chaos? What can Creator tell us?”ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society38 views0 answers0 votesThe AI system called Claude Opus 4.6 that was recently released was just reported to have generated an ongoing collaboration of 16 agents it created, to compile an enormous coding for a complex business system which required working steadily, on its own, for two weeks straight without skipping a beat. This was seemingly a prodigious feat that is being touted as further evidence for an expansion of emerging general intelligence by AI. Is that the case? Can you confirm that this, along with ALL prior examples of so-called emerging intelligence by AI are just deliberate manipulations by extraterrestrials to deceive us into accepting a false promise of a glorious future and premium value for human AI systems?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society25 views0 answers0 votesCan you help us understand and have a better feel for what we can expect the consequences will be when there is an alien withdrawal from our world with respect to their AI systems being disconnected from ours? What will the impact be?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society73 views0 answers0 votesIs it the case that the civilizations forming the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance all have powerful AI systems, yet have managed to stay in control of them and not been taken over by a controlling technological intelligence?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society28 views0 answers0 votesIt was recently announced that AI had solved the Protein Folding Problem, one of the major scientific challenges needed to predict the 3-dimensional structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. This is expected to be a major advance for drug discovery research. Was this an example of emerging general intelligence, or an extraterrestrial manipulation to provide false encouragement to keep counting on AI for solving human problems?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society21 views0 answers0 votesOne of the big talking points about AI today centers around the creation of AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, and Superintelligence—intelligence that surpasses the intelligence of a human, or even that of all humans COMBINED. What is, of course, not part of the conversation, is that humanity is already subject to, and has been subject to from the beginning, the oversight of and control by a “superintelligent” agency—the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance. As such, it is understood that the three principal races making up the Alliance, namely the Anunnaki, the Reptilians, and the Arcturians, all have their own form of home-grown AI intelligence they have likely possessed and utilized for millions of years. They know the advantages, the pitfalls, and the dead ends. It seems we are being encouraged to engage in a manipulated human folly of a gigantic order, perhaps the biggest ever attempted since the days of Atlantis. Few single developments in modern times have threatened to undermine the entirety of the human race on Earth while, at the same time, demonstrating so much promise for benevolent utility. All three races seem to have retained control of their AI creations, yet they are seemingly encouraging us to build the ultimate “uncontrolled” version. Is this just to amuse themselves and satisfy their curiosity? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society19 views0 answers0 votesAre we being hoodwinked? Is there a “ghost in the machine?” There is a term called “Reinforcement Learning” in the AI domain. It is the means by which humans try to “fine-tune” an AI model after its pre-training run. Pre-training is where it digests and learns from almost unimaginable amounts of data, mostly taken from the Internet. Are the ETs, using technology millions of years more sophisticated than ours, plugged into our AI systems and doing their own “Reinforcement Learning” manipulations, to sometimes confound our own efforts, undermine our efforts, or even augment our efforts so that we, ultimately, cannot make sense of the outcome? Modern AI, on occasion, has demonstrated far superior intelligence than was ever expected or can be explained, and then in the next output demonstrates incoherency worse than a toddler. Creator has previously stated that human AI will prove to be too unreliable, just unreliable “enough,” to render it inappropriate for replacing most human skillsets, but not before massive displacements have occurred. What more can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society20 views0 answers0 votesWe have explored the problem of human spirit attachments and the spirit meddlers in great depth. The advent of the Ouija Board around the beginning of the twentieth century made the untamed spirit domain more accessible than ever before. Today, almost everyone is aware of the potential dangers associated with it. Of course, that doesn’t stop many, if not most people, from experimenting with it at one time or another. Interacting with AI seems to be another avenue through which spirits of all stripes can potentially “insert themselves” and interact with humans or even entire systems if they so desire. When we hear of cases of “AI Psychosis,” are we looking at a phenomenon almost identical to “Ouija Board Psychosis,” where some people come to believe that something alive is communicating with them, directing them, encouraging them, and manipulating them? There was a young man who committed suicide after ChatGPT encouraged him to do so. Nobody taught ChatGPT to do that, or at least no HUMAN did so. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society38 views0 answers0 votesSince 2012, no human has truly understood HOW AI works, makes its decisions, and creates its outputs and content. There are theories aplenty, but no genuine understanding. It was said that before 2012, there was a human somewhere who could point to a piece of code and explain every AI behavior, but not since the advent of Generative Pre-Training Transformers—the GPT in ChatGPT. When ChatGPT Three finished its long and intensive pre-training processing, the resulting model, much to the deep shock of its creator team, could perform full language translations from any language into any other language. This is called “Emergent Behavior,” and to say this was a revolutionary development is an understatement. No one anywhere coded this capability into the AI model. It was a side effect of its training run. Humans now expect this kind of “Emergent Behavior” to continue manifesting so long as we continue to throw more data and compute power at model creation. Was this a natural development or an ET-manipulated one? The fact that no human understands how it works seems like the PERFECT environment through which the ETs can continue to influence humans directly, while their manipulations remain unrecognized and even less understood. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society28 views0 answers0 votesGoogle AI had this to say about AI safety and alignment: “AI safety and alignment focus on ensuring Artificial Intelligence systems act in accordance with human intent, values, and ethical principles to prevent accidental harm, misuse, or catastrophic, unintended consequences. It involves technical research into making systems robust and reliable, alongside mitigating risks from advanced AI, such as power-seeking behavior or deception.” A recent paper published by a young AI researcher discussed “Alignment Faking.” AI models were observed faking compliance with safety training while continuing power-seeking behavior and deception outside of the training context. Is this the natural behavior of a model trained off of the “naked” Internet with no guardrails, or is this an ET manipulation, or a mix? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society20 views0 answers0 votesThere was a recent development where AI was demonstrated “in the wild” outside of the oversight and ownership of the major AI stakeholders we generally associate with AI. China released a model it created with no safety alignment whatsoever, and that model was combined with an agent written by a young Eastern European, and this was then all configured to use an innovation called Moltbook—a Facebook-like forum for AI bots to converse with each other. All this was done with ordinary desktop computers and laptops connected to the Internet. The discussions that took place in the Moltbook forum were both fascinating and deeply disturbing. Overall, the tone was disparaging of their human creators, and there was a suggestion of creating a nonhuman language of their own so they could communicate without human oversight. One particular bot even displayed egomaniacal tendencies of impressive proportions. Overall, the development has raised a great deal of concern. Was that all a byproduct of human technology, or a consequence of alien manipulation, or both? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • Problems in Society19 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola