DWQA Questions › Tag: algorithms
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
Elon Musk and President Trump continue their feuding, with Musk threatening to form his own political party over his political disappointment concerning the Big, Beautiful Bill in Congress and its cost, and Trump threatening to deport Musk. What purpose is this serving for their agenda? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
The stock market has been dropping steadily for some time now, most recently being spooked by looming tariffs to be announced by President Trump on April 2, 2025. While billed as a move to eliminate trade wars by creating a level playing field, through creating a policy of simply matching or exceeding tariffs placed by foreign governments on U.S. goods, is there a sinister purpose to cause fear, uncertainty, and produce the opposite result in the build-up to a financial collapse?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the pending financial crash and reset intended to cause mass starvation? If a vast number of humans die in this manner, will it not add to the healing needed before Ascension can occur?”
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
208 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Looking at the central banks from a higher vantage point (i.e. viewing Earth as a planet in space), is it accurate to say that they are, essentially, instruments for turning humanity into debt slaves of aliens? In other words, are central banks a primary mechanism of colonizing an entire planet’s native race?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
256 views0 answers0 votes
There are financial analysts saying that nearly half the world, 50 countries, are currently poised to dump the U.S. dollar, starting with a meeting on October 22, 2024 and that this could change the outcome of the presidential election because it would undermine personal financial security of those holding dollar-denominated assets. Will such a meeting take place as part of a wide de-dollarization? Will this be used as justification for a gold reset, to revalue the net asset value of central banks sitting on large gold hoards? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
225 views0 answers0 votes
The recent 2-hour interview of Donald Trump by Elon Musk was delayed for 40 minutes by “a cyberattack” believed to have been launched by Iran. Was that what actually happened? What is Creator’s perspective on the cause of this delay?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, is the stock market actually a tool for destabilizing the world economy, invented by the Extraterrestrial Alliance? What is Creator’s perspective?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
234 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would humanity have had a monetary system if the interlopers had not invaded our world? Otherwise, how would we have traded with each other and built commerce (if even necessary), considering how tedious bartering is?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
199 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Ray Dalio, the founder of the world’s largest hedge fund, uses an investment strategy based on study of economic history and past political cycles to analyze the cause-and-effect relationships driving current global trends. In his book, Principles for Dealing with the Changing World Order: Why Nations Succeed and Fail, he analyses the rise and fall of major empires, past economic crises and wealth transfers (the Great Depression), political polarization such as populism, and external political conflicts with rising powers such as trade wars. How accurate and reliable is his analysis of past events as an understanding of the ET playbook for enslavement and as a predictor of future patterns?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
289 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “How accurately does the book The Great Taking by David Rogers Webb describe an ET/spirit meddler 50-year plan to steal all financial assets, bank deposits, stocks and bonds, underlying property, inventories, land, mineral deposits, etc? Was the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008 engineered (by brushing aside risk management principles) in order to create legal precedent for secured creditors to take client assets in the case of insolvency? Is the best defense being debt-free and owning unencumbered assets within your direct control such as gold and silver bullion, property owned outright?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
293 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “For how long have stock markets been driven by algorithms? From even before the age of computing?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
252 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »
Ask Question