DWQA Questions › Tag: alien agenda
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
The following was in the news this morning: “Senior European officials are warning that any U.S. attempt to forcibly annex Greenland would trigger sweeping consequences for America’s military footprint across Europe, including the potential loss of access to key U.S. bases. The comments come as President Trump sharpens his rhetoric around acquiring Greenland, reviving and expanding a proposal he first floated in 2019 amid rising tensions with Russia and China in the Arctic.” Is this just political rhetoric in standing up to Trump which will stabilize things, or is there a deliberate plan underway to further inflame anti-U.S. sentiment by having the U.S. move on Greenland?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “1850s humans in Rock Wall, Texas, dug up prehistoric Lime Stone wall buried in at least a 19-mile configuration. Is this a natural geologic formation as advised by scientists or is this an early human settlement prior to Atlantean times or an Anunnaki construction for defensive purposes as Giant skeletons were found and then lost by the Smithsonian Institute?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The Montana Sage Wall is a much larger structure. Would this also be a prehistoric human or Anunnaki construction and for what purpose was it built?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
Waiting is agonizing. Is there anything you can share about timing of the tidal power outages? Do you see it starting before the end of the current calendar year, or getting pushed into next year? Is my February trip safe to take?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
Is President Trump’s friendly embrace of Zohran Mamdami, who he has previously vilified as the communist recently elected mayor of New York, just him being in a good mood and wanting to deflect personal animosity, or more sinister? Is it betraying an ego-based self-importance, knowing as he does that anything bad that happens to New York will serve the alien agenda, and anyone watching his remarks on TV is being duped?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
Pres. Trump seems hard at work to help the U.S. economy by encouraging foreign investment and bringing jobs back to America. While this seems to go against the alien agenda of engineering a financial collapse, is it really a cynical ploy to encourage the world to put their money to work in America knowing much of it will be lost with the coming downturn?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
Has there been a significant change in the alien agenda with respect to the sequence expected to start soon, the tidal power outages triggering a market collapse, followed by a gold reset to really undermine the U.S. dollar, and then Alien Disclosure? Has my steadfast belief in the prior channelings put me in a rut so that I cannot be warned about a change in the alien plans? We have been encouraged, successively, to expect fireworks at any time for months now, reassured it would likely be prior to the fall, then take place within the months of September or October, and now it’s nearly December. What is the unbiased Creator’s perspective of where things stand?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
184 views0 answers0 votes
CNN reported: “President Donald Trump on Thursday vowed to begin testing US nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China, heralding a potentially major shift in decades of US policy at a time of growing tensions between the world’s nuclear-armed superpowers…In a post on social media Trump said, ‘…Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,’ Trump said.” Some view this as sabre rattling, others as diplomacy through taking a tough stance as in “Peace Through Strength.” Is there an underlying purpose in terms of the alien agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
211 views0 answers0 votes
The term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
307 views0 answers0 votes
When people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
244 views0 answers0 votes
An argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
261 views0 answers0 votes
Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
330 views0 answers0 votes
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
257 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
171 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345…7Next »
Ask Question