DWQA Questions › Tag: cancer
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A review article shows little or no benefit of supplementing patients with vitamin D3 for bone fractures (T. Gatt, A. Grech, and H. Arshad. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation for bone healing in fracture patients: a systematic review. Adv. Orthopedics Volume 2023, Article ID 6236045). However, the supplement doses of vitamin D3 were either low, 800-2000 IU daily, or quite high loading doses orally or systemically of 100,000 to 300,000 IU. Was their negative assessment justified or were the studies flawed? Would taking a 5000 to 10,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 daily, give significant benefit for healing bone fractures?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
23 views0 answers0 votes
A systematic review of 416 medical journal articles affirmed a strong association between higher serum vitamin D levels and a lower risk of bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, rectal, stomach, and vulvar cancers, as well as Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The review also uncovered lower risks of metastasis and mortality from cancer in patients with higher levels of vitamin D. While vitamin D levels of 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/L) were adequate for bone and muscle health, reduction of cancer risk and mortality required levels greater than 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L) and fell further with levels above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). The review cautioned that studies showing no benefit for those taking less than 5,000 IU per day might be misleading. [Wimalawansa SJ. Vitamin D’s impact on cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2025 Jul 16;17(14):2333. Doi: 10.3390/nu17142333.] Is this a fair summary of vitamin D benefits for limiting incidence and severity of cancer?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 5000 IU of vitamin D3 taken twice a day would be safe and helpful for many, many people. Is that enough to get serum levels in a useful range for cancer prevention?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
Studies have shown that vitamin D levels have an inverted U-shaped curve, where low levels (<29.7 nmol/L) result in shortened telomeres on DNA, a sign of aging, but so do high levels of vitamin D (>95.9 nmol/L). Population-based studies and randomized clinical trials have shown a U- or J-shaped curve and suggested an increased risk of adverse outcomes in those with the highest serum Vitamin D levels, including falls, fractures, and frailty. Most studies have reported a higher risk in those participants with serum levels above 100 nmol/L. Are the deleterious effects noted in these studies caused by elevated vitamin D? If so, your support for taking 5,000 to 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily seems risky. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 days ago • 
7 views0 answers0 votes
How effective is the Primal Force supplement, Telo X Nano, for adding to longevity?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Would I benefit from taking Telo X Nano? I am taking nearly all the ingredients except for arginine alpha ketoglutarate and carnosine, although not in the “nano” form promoted by Primal Force as achieving better bioavailability.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
A recent paper describes a pretty convincing case study of a skin cancer caused by Human Papillomavirus. Was this accurately described?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
154 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 85% of cancers are caused by viruses, and also that, contrary to dermatologists’ thinking, malignancies in the skin, including melanoma, are not due to sun exposure as much as it is to electromagnetic frequencies, which bombard people’s skin. What percent of skin carcinomas are caused by viruses?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
What percent of Secondary Sarcopenia cases associated with systemic diseases like cancer and organ failure are caused by chronic viral infection?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
182 views0 answers0 votes
Does the Antiviral Regimen have meaningful activity against malignant cells or tumor formation so that it would be an effective treatment, alone or in combination with other substances?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
Does Cannabitol 5000 have meaningful activity against malignant cells or tumor formation so that it would be an effective treatment, alone or in combination with other substances?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
174 views0 answers0 votes
Does Chaga have meaningful activity against malignant cells or tumor formation so that it would be an effective treatment, alone or in combination with other substances?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
144 views0 answers0 votes
Does Advanced Mitochondrial Formula have meaningful activity against malignant cells or tumor formation so that it would be an effective treatment, alone or in combination with other substances?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
139 views0 answers0 votes
Does Kiva Black Seed Oil have meaningful activity against malignant cells or tumor formation so that it would be an effective treatment, alone or in combination with other substances?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
108 views0 answers0 votes
123…14Next »
Ask Question