DWQA Questions › Tag: egoFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesEpictetus said: “Covetousness like jealousy, when it has taken root, never leaves a person, but with their life.” Actually, that is probably not entirely true as covetousness becomes a karmic dilemma that grows and rebirth brings around again and again the circumstances that trigger covetousness, but with greater intensity and imperative with each go-around. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society281 views0 answers0 votesWilliam Mason said: “Consider the evil of covetousness. That insatiable desire prevents present contentment, destroys thankfulness, yes, and keeps the enjoyment of Christ out of the heart…” Can Creator tell us if this is indeed true as opposed to mostly true? Is covetousness truly an INSATIABLE desire—a thirst that can never be quenched? And if it is, how is it that consciousness can fall into such a condition? Is covetousness only a problem with sentient souls, or can lower life forms struggle with this as well? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society438 views0 answers0 votesFrances Bacon said: “The covetous man cannot so properly be said to possess wealth, as that may be said to possess him.” Bacon is suggesting that covetousness is a form of obsession, and perhaps even a form of possession. Can Creator share with us how interlopers, spirit attachments, and even mind control manipulation can aggravate and take advantage of this proclivity, this vulnerability?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society344 views0 answers0 votesMartha Stout, PhD, wrote about the problem of “covetous sociopathy” in her book, The Sociopath Next Door. She writes, “The covetous sociopath thinks that life has cheated her somehow, has not given her nearly the same bounty as other people, and so she must even the existential score by robbing people, by secretly causing destruction in other lives. She believes she has been slighted by nature, circumstances, and destiny, and that diminishing other people is her only means of being powerful. Retribution, usually against people who have no idea that they have been targeted, is the most important activity in the covetous sociopath’s life, her highest priority.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society284 views0 answers0 votesMartha Stout wrote: “What sociopaths envy, and may seek to destroy as part of the game, is usually something in the character structure of a person with conscience, and strong characters are often specifically targeted by sociopaths. Sociopaths want to play their game with other people. This simple but crucial observation implies that, in sociopathy, there remains some innate identification with other human beings, a tie with the species itself. However, this thin inborn connection, is one-dimensional and sterile, especially when contrasted with the vast array of complex and highly charged emotional responses most people have to one another and to their fellow human beings as a group.” Covetousness seems to be a form of envy. Is envy really the last “connection” the sociopath has to other beings? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society284 views0 answers0 votesIf there is anything the extraterrestrials actually “envy” about us, what is it? Is it the joy and happiness we feel with each other on account of our loving nature that they do not possess nor understand? By sheer observation they can see how pleasurable and satisfying a healthy love relationship can be, and while they might tell themselves it’s all silly foolishness, deep down, do they “know” it’s not? Do they suspect they are “missing out” on something and does this fuel their hatred? Is their arrogance and self-aggrandizement really a cover for deep unrelenting pain they can never successfully suppress entirely? Really, WHY do they hate us so much? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society326 views0 answers0 votesWe are once again face to face with a divine-level problem—the problem of healing covetousness. But while the details of healing are carried out by the divine, nothing happens without our intention enabling that healing to be carried out. If divine healing were a pizza, it wouldn’t arrive at your door on its own. You have to order and pay for it. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the means, really the only means, by which the covetous heart can be healed in all beings, both physical and spiritual?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Problems in Society300 views0 answers0 votesPrior to the recent agreement to withdraw after the Disclosure Event and take a break from their endless manipulations of our planet and everything on it, has it been a kind of free-for-all, where many individuals can come and take a turn, perhaps competing amongst their brethren to see who can be most clever, most destructive, most innovative, and so on? Or is there an agreed on main agenda where all must follow an approved set of guidelines and goals? There have been at least a couple major motion pictures having a futuristic theme where people can use an advanced technology to journey to an artificial world and adopt a persona to have lifelike experiences for fun and relaxation, or challenge and excitement. One was Westworld, depicting people going back to the old West to take on gunslingers, and more recently, the movie Total Recall, where people could pay to have a vacation in their mind that was totally lifelike. Both movies showed a dark side in having an unexpected blending with reality. This was also a theme used many times in the Star Trek franchise, in having spaceships with a Holodeck that future explorers could visit during long voyages as a lifelike experiencing of other worlds and plotlines for fun and learning opportunities. Are these a kind of inversion of what the extraterrestrials do in visiting our world, coming to participate as observers who can manipulate us, in reality, to act out their fantasies and darkest thoughts for amusement and gratification, but without taking any risk themselves?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers471 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “With the extraterrestrials being atheists, what do they believe as the reason for their existence? That is, where did they come from, and why do they have sentience, etc? How do they explain the spiritual realm?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs395 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Is the existence of the spiritual realm common knowledge amongst the general extraterrestrial population or is it safeguarded information?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs1692 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Are there any extraterrestrial races of the Dark ET Alliance who are aware of the fact that they as a species do, in fact, reincarnate? For example, does the leadership of the Anunnaki have access to this knowledge and choose to keep it secret, considering the fact that they are the longest-lived and oldest known species in our galaxy?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Limiting Beliefs385 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers408 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers363 views0 answers0 votesIntelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions433 views0 answers0 votesWhile being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions402 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola