DWQA Questions › Tag: God’s existenceFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm60 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm51 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm18 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm44 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm50 views0 answers0 votesIn a channeling about the Rules of Engagement, you told us: “The more people are elevated and put on a pedestal, even for lofty thinking that is in divine alignment, the more karmic consequences can develop from people less fortunate becoming discouraged and feeling increasingly disempowered and helpless. Because all humans are interlinked as part of a family, the more exalted one becomes, the more it reflects an imbalance that will lower others affected by the contrast in seeing themselves as inferior and believing this is so.” Is this why Jesus Christ washed the feet of his disciples?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers140 views0 answers0 votesWe have heard you explain many times that the divine realm is limited in how it can intervene in human affairs by the “Rules of Engagement.” Can you give us a tutorial to help people understand the specific rules and why they exist?ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • Divine Realm43 views0 answers0 votesApostle Peter said: “‘But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day…’ (2Peter 3:8,10)” What is the true meaning of this it was intended to convey?ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • Divine Realm322 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “One of the things I was told, from a very young age, is that God is omniscient, including all future events. Recently a prediction on the subject of US power outages for November 8 failed to materialize. Refusing to throw out the baby with the bath water, as the relationship I have built up with Creator thanks to GetWisdom and the Lightworker Healing Protocol feels very true, I am left with the conclusion that Creator can sometimes fail to predict the future. Is this because of freewill and the rules of engagement (to never lead), or is there another reason?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Creator576 views0 answers0 votesOne of the biggest obstacles to belief in the Divine is the so-called problem of evil: How could an all-powerful loving God allow evil acts to prevail?ClosedNicola asked 7 years ago • Creator1695 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes, “I thought you would find this writing interesting by Tom Montalk: ‘Interesting thing to ponder: what’s stronger, military might or divine power? The obvious answer is divine power. But then you look at history: 1) 10-20 million Christians killed by the Soviets; 2) 1000s of Christians killed by ISIS in the Middle East this past decade alone; 3) 100s of thousands of Christian children during the Crusades headed to Jerusalem only to be killed or sold into slavery on their way; 4) Always that good Christian family in the news who lost everything in a storm or earthquake or flood. You would think, based on this, that God clearly favors communists and Muslims and natural disasters. Besides, why should divinity favor Christians? What about all the other religions? But millions of communists, Muslims, and Jews have died as well over the centuries. Is there any class of people that’s consistently protected by the divine against military might? You could go back to the Old Testament and the Israelites and what was done for them, which if true, brings up the question of why back then and not since? Yet there’s no doubt that tyrannies and armies have risen and fallen and, in the end, spirituality and religion has endured. So spirit has the last laugh, but was it a Pyrrhic victory considering the millions lost? Or do we place too much value on life and comfort, and death, torture, and slavery isn’t that big of a deal in the eyes of eternity? There are also countless anecdotes of individuals and small groups of people being saved by supernatural intervention. Mysterious strangers helping them only to disappear without a trace, or voices telling them where to seek shelter, or the very laws of physics being bent to keep them from dying. And we have key people being guided by supernatural influences to exert their position/authority to help many other people. So certain individuals matter at certain times enough to get major intervention. But what’s missing is collective, massive, open divine intervention against military physical force, especially in the last 1000 years, let alone modern times. That hasn’t happened to my knowledge, unless it’s been covered up. And because of that, the USSR could kill up to 20 million Christians because it had the military might to do so, and because, for whatever reason, divine power doesn’t prevent collective events.'” His first question is: “Is divinity unable to [prevent collective events]? Then it’s not omnipotent.” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator583 views0 answers0 votesThe author says this about the divine choosing to not intervene on behalf of groups: “Then it condoned genocide in the 20th century and favored the Nazis and Communists over Christians and Jews. If it’s willing to sacrifice them, what does that say about our safety during the coming times?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator443 views0 answers0 votesThe author further asks about divine intervention on behalf of groups: “Did it do that once upon a time, like with the Israelites? If so, why not now? And does that have anything to do with the supposed quarantine that went into effect 3k years ago preventing aliens from openly interfering with human development? Or were the Israelites being protected by aliens? Or is the history of the Israelites fabricated?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator442 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “If it [divine power] doesn’t prevent genocide, what is the reason? Karma of the victims? If so, does that mean mass murderers are guiltless because they are just fulfilling the karmic “wishes” of the victims and thus doing them a spiritual service?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator413 views0 answers0 votesThe author continues: “Or is the temporary victory of military might, and the thousands or millions that suffer as a result, merely a product of the rules of the game here, a necessary side effect of free will being an integral part of this whole experience?” What is Creator’s Perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Creator376 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola