DWQA Questions › Tag: Hinduism
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
50 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
Creator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
Regardless of the workings of karma itself, we have learned that divine intervention is the means to heal, avoid, and/or reduce and attenuate karmic debts and dilemmas. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Memory Reset, and Divine Life Support bring about the desired divine intervention to heal karmic difficulties?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Looking at the Creator database, I see no inquiries into Hinduism and whether gods like Shiva were, indeed, divine or ET. It seems confusing since we have definitely learned that Eastern mystics and religious people have been on the right track in many ways and some of their great holy men have done many miracles. We have also learned that the caste systems are used by the Dark Alliance to control their people and probably was introduced on Earth, especially in India. Perhaps that was ET corruption of something that was also put in place by Creator and enlightened humans. The ancient Hindu writings do talk about wars between gods in the sky using ancient spacecraft called vimanas. If true, that implies ET but doesn’t necessarily mean that Hinduism was exclusively misidentifying ETs as gods. What can Creator tell us to clarify these contradictions?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The Ganges is considered by Hindus and even some skeptics to be a sacred river. To Hindus the Ganges is seen as a pure and purifying body of water that is incredibly important. To scientists and outsiders the Ganges appears to be a horrifying example of modern pollution and political corruption where humans are failing to cooperate with a common goal. Is the Ganges River receiving divine protection thanks to a mass prayer request from billions of inhabitants of that region? Are the people that regard the Ganges as sacred providing the intention necessary to allow the divine realm to transform and transmute this potentially harmful and polluted water into something safe?”
ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • 
140 views0 answers0 votes
Elizabeth Clare Prophet took over The Summit Lighthouse when her husband Mark L. Prophet died in 1973. He founded this organization in 1958 to spread a message combining elements of Christianity, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Theosophy. The New York Times had this to say upon her death in 2009: “In 1975, she founded the Church Universal and Triumphant, a formal religion with ceremonies and sacraments, extending the work of the Lighthouse. The religion’s teachings were derived from divine messages believed to be transmitted by the Ascended Masters, a pantheon of mystic saints and sages, among them Jesus and the Theosophist Master El Morya. Its worldwide membership was once estimated at 30,000 to 50,000 people.” What can Creator tell us about Elizabeth Clare Prophet? Did she really receive messages from Ascended Masters?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
263 views0 answers0 votes
In the late 1980s, Mrs. Prophet issued warnings of an impending nuclear strike by the Soviet Union against the United States. More than 2,000 of her followers left their homes and gathered at the church’s compound near Corwin Springs, Montana, near the northern edge of Yellowstone National Park. There they began stockpiling weapons, food, and clothing in underground bomb shelters. Of course, the prophesized nuclear strike never happened, and the Church went into rapid decline after this, and today a much smaller remnant remains. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
206 views0 answers0 votes
Mrs. Prophet experienced early onset Alzheimer’s disease at age 58 and died twelve years later. She lost her ability to write in just two years, and her ability to speak not long after that. We learned from Creator that Alzheimer’s is actually the workings of the deep subconscious responding to the self’s desire to “escape” overwhelming anxiety stemming from a lifetime of emotional wounding. Did the pressures of leading a large spiritual community, feeling responsible for their welfare, the distress and fallout stemming from the inaccurate prediction of nuclear war, and all that entailed, and perhaps having no one to turn to, no one she could lean on and draw strength from, create the mental conditions leading to her Alzheimer’s and relatively early passing? Were spirit attachments a contributing factor, or was this some other form of victimization? Is she in the light, or does she need a Spirit Rescue?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
194 views0 answers0 votes
Was all that doomsday preparation they did a kind of folly? Were her followers sold an interloper “bill of goods” and sent on a wild goose chase that arguably sidelined the movement, and neutered its genuine potential to awaken humanity? If the nuclear war she actually foresaw had come to pass, how would her community likely have fared?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
123Next »