DWQA Questions › Tag: human ascension
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Dr. Carl Wickland, born in Sweden, got his medical degree at Durham Medical College in Chicago, graduating in 1900. After obtaining his degree, he became a general practitioner of medicine specializing in researching mental illnesses. He married Anna Anderson in 1896. Anna was a natural-born psychic of impressive ability. In 1909, Wickland became chief psychiatrist at the National Psychopathic Institute of Chicago. He continued in that position until 1918 when he and his wife moved to Los Angeles, California. Anna Wickland proved to be an excellent psychic intermediary and was easily controlled by discarnate intelligences. In answer to her doubts concerning the right “disturbing the dead,” these intelligences asserted that a grievously wrong conception existed among mortals regarding the conditions prevailing after death. These intelligences also stated that by a system of transfer, that is, by attracting such obsessing entities from the victim to a psychic intermediary, … conditions could be shown as they actually exist. … They claimed they had found his wife to be a suitable instrument for such experimentation and proposed that, if Dr. Wickland would cooperate with them by caring for and instructing these ignorant spirits, as they allowed them to take temporary but complete possession of his wife’s body, without any injury to her, they would prove their assertions were correct. Desirous of learning the truth … we accepted what seemed to be a hazardous undertaking. The book then describes multiple instances of these “experiments” where an ignorant spirit would be “allowed”, and even “guided” (by intelligent spirits working in tandem) to take temporary control of Mrs. Wickland’s body, enabling Dr. Wickland to have a dialogue with them, attempting to educate them about their true condition, and attempting to persuade them to change their behavior and outlook. Mrs. Wickland had no recollection of the dialogues that took place while she was “absent.” What is Creator’s perspective of this project and the resulting book by Dr. Wickland, “Thirty Years Among the Dead,” published in 1924?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Richard J. Davidson, author of “The Emotional Life of Your Brain”, says understanding the brain increases agency over emotional reactions. He claims you can train the brain to respond differently to challenges and that with the right mental exercises, and habits, it’s possible to reshape neural pathways, enhance resilience, attention, and overall emotional well-being. For example, he claims that naming an emotion activates the prefrontal cortex, which helps regulate the brain’s fear-and-stress center. He says the prefrontal cortex can also regulate other emotion-generating regions (amygdala, insula, hippocampus). How effective are these suggestions in gaining agency over emotional reaction?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The classical view of emotions is they “happen to you” – regulation means managing reactions after they occur (e.g., calming down when angry). Lisa Feldman Barrett’s Theory of Constructed Emotion however argues that emotions are constructed (based on context, past learning, and bodily input) rather than hardwired biological and universal responses. If correct, practices like increasing body awareness, expanding emotional vocabulary, and reframing experiences can change the way we build emotions in real time. How well can this framework be used to turn emotional reactions into something we can consciously shape, meaning we have agency over how we feel, rather than just endure?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
She continues: “Is there anything more that Creator could tell us about the energetic causes of this car/train wreck and its lasting results?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
CNN reported: “President Donald Trump on Thursday vowed to begin testing US nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China, heralding a potentially major shift in decades of US policy at a time of growing tensions between the world’s nuclear-armed superpowers…In a post on social media Trump said, ‘…Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,’ Trump said.” Some view this as sabre rattling, others as diplomacy through taking a tough stance as in “Peace Through Strength.” Is there an underlying purpose in terms of the alien agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
138 views0 answers0 votes
What percent of people have lost soul spirit attachments?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “When we pass over to the other side, are we still the person we are today, or do we become our higher self?” Can you give us a tutorial about how this all works, as we are experiencing and only aware of but a small portion of our soul, coming down into the physical plane for short incarnations?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
87 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “As a commandment, are we still to keep the sabbath holy and not work on Sunday or Saturday?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
Recently, Karl checked with Creator to determine if an early 1970s book created by automatic writing, The Book of James by psychic Susy Smith, was, in fact, dictated by William James, who transitioned to spirit in 1910. Wikipedia says this about William James, “William James was an American philosopher and psychologist. The first educator to offer a psychology course in the United States, he is considered to be one of the leading thinkers of the late 19th century, one of the most influential philosophers and is often dubbed the ‘father of American psychology.'” Creator said, “This was an accurate and meaningful channeling from the attributed source, so it can be relied on to represent the information conveyed in that body of work.” James, through Susy Smith via automatic writing, explained his motives for channeling the book: “I was interested in psychical research for most of my life. … As I grew older and more cynical I dismissed (discussions of life after death) and approached psychical research from the scientific point of view. Although I saw a good deal of evidence for survival … at no time did I conclude anything more definitive than, ‘I remain uncertain and await more facts.'” However, after James’s death, and through Susy Smith, he says this: “I have acquired more facts now and am happy to impart them to the world. My advanced awareness (from a lifetime of psychical research) prepared me for my transition, and my passing was so much easier than that of most of my contemporaries that I very soon came to realize the value of such knowledge. Because I am aware, then, of how important this information can be to one at the moment of death and even for a long time afterward, I am especially eager to offer the facts for public perusal. I am not alone in my efforts. A great many over here are determined to get the truth about survival to you. We know that the lives of all those now on Earth will change for the better when they know with certainty that there is no death—that they will endure in a life of continuity.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
61 views0 answers0 votes
James wrote through Susy Smith: “The thing that seems to be most surprising to most people is to learn that there is no abrupt change of personality or place immediately after death. The area in which one finds himself after he has left the physical body – to which we will refer herein as either the Etheric or the Astral plane because those are the terms commonly used when you people (who are still living physical lives) write about them – is, in its lower reaches, identical with the earth plane of existence. One leaves this (lower astral environment to higher levels) only as he becomes enlightened as to his true state and learns how to progress to more exalted spheres.” James continues, “Until you become aware of your need to advance, you may remain in your old haunts for a long, long time.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
James continues: “I do not wish you to think, however, that we are immaterial beings floating around in a void. We are far from it, especially in our early stages of life in the spirit world. We have our spiritual bodies and we live in them, using them just as we used our physical bodies on Earth, but not having to be slaves to them.” James continues: “In order for you to not find this overpoweringly confusing that you are unable to cope, you are permitted by the system to live in your spiritual body in similar conditions to those you previously knew and felt comfortable with, in such close proximity to Earth that you can continue to feel at home in your new environment.” James continues: “We have always thought that if we lived at all after death, we would have to be entirely transformed immediately. We expected, if anything at all, a change of conditions so vast as to put us into an altogether different circumstance. When this does not occur, we are confused and find it difficult to accept. I must make it clear now that this transition is gradual for a very definite reason. Supreme Intelligence planned it that way as the most sensible and workable arrangement for man’s advancement.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345…50Next »
Ask Question