DWQA Questions › Tag: human dietFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesA review article shows little or no benefit of supplementing patients with vitamin D3 for bone fractures (T. Gatt, A. Grech, and H. Arshad. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation for bone healing in fracture patients: a systematic review. Adv. Orthopedics Volume 2023, Article ID 6236045). However, the supplement doses of vitamin D3 were either low, 800-2000 IU daily, or quite high loading doses orally or systemically of 100,000 to 300,000 IU. Was their negative assessment justified or were the studies flawed? Would taking a 5000 to 10,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 daily, give significant benefit for healing bone fractures?ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions49 views0 answers0 votesIs the gluten-free low-carb pasta called “It’s Skinny Pasta,” which is made with konjac flour, safe to use and helpful as a dietary substitute for minimizing unneeded carbohydrates? Their spaghetti has 0 carbs, 0 sugars, and only 4.5 calories per serving.ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • Divine Guidance24 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I eat a single large hot dog once or twice a week as a source of protein. It makes a quick, easy-to-cook meal when my wife is busy, but I worry about eating low quality meat containing preservatives. Is this hazardous to my health, and if so, why? Would it be of significant benefit to my health to avoid them by substituting eggs and/or bacon?”ClosedNicola asked 7 months ago • Divine Guidance328 views0 answers0 votesMany studies show people around the world who have 1-2 glasses of wine with dinner are healthier. If true, is that due to a benefit of alcohol in moderation as a mild stressor, or presence of beneficial nutraceuticals in the wine apart from alcohol, or a combination?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Divine Guidance400 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us tomatoes are safe to eat. Studies have shown that foods, like tomatoes, which contain lectins, are a cause of leaky gut. Is this a significant risk? Are there safe limits on tomato consumption?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Divine Guidance411 views0 answers0 votesStudies have shown that peanuts contain lectins, which are a cause of leaky gut. Is this a significant risk? Are there safe limits on peanut consumption?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Divine Guidance324 views0 answers0 votesAre beets of significant benefit in controlling homocysteine levels in the body? Are there other benefits?ClosedNicola asked 9 months ago • Divine Guidance312 views0 answers0 votesThe trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and a prior myocardial infarction (MI) was reported in September, 2024. While there was a significant reduction in circulating heavy metals following months of weekly intravenous EDTA infusions, there was not a significant reduction in cardiovascular events or mortality. You told us previously that EDTA therapy was actually beneficial, as the first TACT study showed, but that the interlopers were suppressing beneficial clinical data. Is that the reason for the failed confirmation with the TACT2 follow-up?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions331 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is Mirror Life Microbe research an interloper technology existing within their own societies or is this directed at humans only (as so many other things)?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions250 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Seasilver was a supplement containing the herb pau d’arco, cranberry, and aloe. It got a lot of fanfare back in the late 90s and early 2000s. It was run out of business by the FTC and fined $120 million. They ceased doing business in 2006. Was this an ‘honest’ product being sold for its genuine health benefits? Or a scam? Or was it a good product whose benefits were exaggerated intentionally, with awareness, or unintentionally? Did they legitimately run afoul of the FDA and FTC, or were they targeted by overzealous enforcement, reading ‘too much’ into the laws and regulations governing supplements? Who are the bad guys here and who are the good guys, or were they both breaking and bending the rules of ‘fair play?'” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions207 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Did this constitute an interloper backlash of the manufacturers and sellers of this Seasilver product? Is this an object lesson we should be mindful of?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions211 views0 answers0 votesYou clarified that Vitamin D levels of 40 to 60 ng/mL are important for healthy well-being, but not specifically how important this vitamin is for the recommended Antiviral Regimen to be effective. What is most important for us to know?ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • Healing Modalities244 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is the efficacy of Creator’s antivirals affected by a person’s vitamin D levels? A recent research paper, ‘Vitamin D: A key player in COVID-19 immunity and lessons from the pandemic to combat immune-evasive variants,’ suggests all viral infections are more effectively treated when patients have vitamin D levels between 30-60ng/mL. In 2011, the Endocrine Society urged that: ‘to guarantee sufficiency, we recommend between 40 and 60 ng/mL for both children and adults.'” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • Healing Modalities186 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Will Creator’s Antiviral Regimen efficacy improve significantly at vitamin D recommended levels of 40 to 60 ng/mL? Should vitamin K2 also be taken to boost absorption of vitamin D?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 12 months ago • Healing Modalities198 views0 answers0 votesThe Endocrine Society updated their guidelines for 2024 to advise against routine vitamin D screening and routine supplementation for certain populations, including non-pregnant adults aged 19 to 74. The Society cited lack of definitive clinical data to support the benefits, and this reverses previous guidelines that recommended supplementation among all age groups. Is this a good policy, and if vitamin D supplementation is truly justified, why is there a lack of conclusive scientific evidence?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions245 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola