DWQA Questions › Tag: human disempowerment
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A disturbingly large number of AI pioneers, stakeholders, and observers warn of catastrophic consequences if AI stays on its current trajectory. Many agree with the assumption that there is at least a 20% chance of human extinction if the current course is maintained. That’s the same odds of dying if you played Russian Roulette with a five-shot revolver. And yet the drive for AI is more desperate than ever. Billions are not only being spent on datacenters and expertise, but also on paying off politicians so they either stay hands-off, or at least slow walk any attempt at regulation of AI development and rollout. So we have a conundrum where precisely when concerns of AI safety are growing exponentially, so is the effort to get to Superintelligent AI more aggressively than ever. The problems surrounding AI safety seem almost insurmountable, currently. At a time when you can’t even sell a child’s toy without it surviving an absolute gauntlet of restrictive regulations, AI gets a free pass. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
71 views0 answers0 votes
The push to use AI for business automation is getting profound. During a recent three-day leadership meeting in a publicly well-known organization, it was reported that the word AI was used at least 400 times. The goal, of course, is to increase productivity and reduce costs. And the number one cost, of course, is human labor. So corporate leaders are now pushing employees to essentially “eliminate themselves” with AI. And if they don’t do it, they will be fired, and others will be brought in who will be willing to do it. Companies are driven by profit and, as such, have little if any “social consciousness.” Every organization will be contributing to a massive unemployment crisis while feeling zero responsibility for it. No one is ready for a Western society with 30, 40, or 50% unemployment, or more. The assumptive fear is that this will tear the social fabric, breach the social contract, and risk potential anarchy. Governments will have to respond with overwhelming force just to maintain any kind of control. The predictions are DIRE, and there is almost universal agreement about the probability of this outcome. Is this a key part of the Disclosure Environment being engineered by the ETs, so that they can pretend to be our friends and save us from ourselves and our out-of-control development of dangerous things like AI? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
AI is here, and its potential for harm is now becoming more widely recognized than ever before. It will affect every human on Earth either directly or indirectly. That there is a very bumpy road ahead seems inevitable now. What is not inevitable, however, is our very survival as a species. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support prevent an AI Armageddon? What more can Get Wisdom do to help prevent the worst outcomes? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
95 views0 answers0 votes
Are human AI systems and platforms deliberately corrupted by the extraterrestrial interlopers to further undermine human institutions relying on AI repositories of human knowledge?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
Are some of the amazing and unexpected feats resembling human general intelligence arising “spontaneously” in AI systems actually a deliberate external manipulation by the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance to encourage the ongoing frenzied optimism of the current AI mania you have told us is a kind of bubble?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Married couples often think, “If we just love each other more everything will work out.” Humanity, though, identifies specific sources of difficulties and solutions. Psychological approaches focus on personality traits, attachment styles, and emotional patterns. Sociological approaches focus on social structures, norms, and inequalities. Therapeutic approaches focus on communication, conflict resolution, and repair. Behavioral approaches focus on marriage as a set of changeable behaviors. Given the high levels of ignorance of the karmic causes of relationship troubles, and the weaknesses and variable effectiveness of the main approaches, how can “be more loving,” even the divine principles version, be enough?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
In the news is “…a scheme that involved exchanging government SNAP benefits for cash at a discount, selling ineligible items like liquor and beer, and even profiting from “MannaPacks”—humanitarian rice meal packs intended for global aid, which were sold for $8 each. Undercover operations confirmed the fraud, with agents witnessing cash trafficking and noting that the stores generated minimal legitimate revenue. That wasn’t some petty scam; it was part of a massive fraud ring run by Haitian nationals in Boston. At the same time, another scheme operated by Yemeni nationals in New York was busy pulling off a similar heist. Combined, these criminal enterprises are charged with stealing a staggering $27 million in taxpayer-funded food stamps. And that’s just what we know about so far. This isn’t a story about a few bad apples. This is organized crime, plain and simple. Federal authorities say the Boston ring allegedly used comically small convenience stores—we’re talking glorified closets—to launder an incredible $500,000 in SNAP benefits every single month. That’s more than six times what a typical large supermarket processes. Over in Brooklyn, it was the same story, different cast. Yemeni nationals were indicted for a racket that vacuumed up $20 million, using fake and stolen EBT cards from at least ten different states. If this sounds familiar, it should. It’s the same playbook we saw with the massive welfare fraud indictments of Somali nationals in Minnesota. This is a systemic attack on America’s welfare system.” Is this more than ordinary criminality?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “We’ve been told that Anunnaki spirits are the commanders of the fallen angelics in our world. How does Lucifer view this seeming takeover of his kind? Is he unconcerned cause he still has a large cohort under his direct control? What is his take on deceased physical beings undermining his authority?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Practitioners of the dark arts and negative ETs are purported to sacrifice babies and drink the blood of sacrificial victims. They claim that the blood can give them special powers in fact. What is the significance of blood in those dark rituals? We know that blood is a key to the life force of every mammal. What does it constitute from a divine perspective?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
85 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “1850s humans in Rock Wall, Texas, dug up prehistoric Lime Stone wall buried in at least a 19-mile configuration. Is this a natural geologic formation as advised by scientists or is this an early human settlement prior to Atlantean times or an Anunnaki construction for defensive purposes as Giant skeletons were found and then lost by the Smithsonian Institute?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
97 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “The Montana Sage Wall is a much larger structure. Would this also be a prehistoric human or Anunnaki construction and for what purpose was it built?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Being aware of Creator’s previous answers on Vitamin D3 supplementation I was shocked to discover a paper from 2014 “A Statistical Error in the Estimation of the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Vitamin D”. The paper claims that the Recommended Daily Allowance advocated by the Institute of Medicine for Vitamin D was incorrectly calculated! In fact, analyzing the data correctly, nearly 9000 IUs per day are required to achieve target levels (600 IU per day is the USA recommended level). I was struck by how closely the 9000 IU figure matched Creator’s “daily doses of 5,000 to 10,000 IU vitamin D3 will rarely be harmful.” What is Creator’s perspective on this “miscalculation” coming to light?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
A British group reported recently that administration of vitamin D2, which is converted to vitamin D3 by the body, may be disadvantageous. A review of random controlled trials showed that taking vitamin D2 can lead to a decrease in vitamin D3 levels, the more active form generated by sunlight exposure. The research indicates that D2 supplementation may not only be less effective, but can also lead to lower concentrations of D3 in the circulation. [Emily I G Brown, et al. Effect of Vitamin D2 Supplementation on 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutr Rev, 2025 Sep 18:nuaf166.doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaf166]. Is this an accurate and meaningful assessment? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Would the techniques of releasing trapped emotions, as expressed in Dr. Bradley Nelson’s book The Emotion Code be of benefit for conscious healing processes? Dr. Nelson claims that his procedure reaches the subconscious and interacts with it in clearing trapped emotions.”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Many people assume the self is mostly fixed, defined by circumstances, something to “find,” not something you shape or choose. But modern psychology sees the self as constructed, context-sensitive, and changeable. Some philosophers and New Age advocates also claim we can choose who we become. We seem to have part of us that defines an “automatic experience of reality” that decides what becomes “real” for us but we also seem to have a capacity to choose a new “intentional reality” as a story we choose and create by changing how we interpret things via our beliefs and biases. Can Creator give a brief tutorial to explain this dilemma to help us intentionally create better versions of ourselves?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
109 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…36Next »
Ask Question