DWQA Questions › Tag: human enslavement
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
CNN reported: “President Donald Trump on Thursday vowed to begin testing US nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China, heralding a potentially major shift in decades of US policy at a time of growing tensions between the world’s nuclear-armed superpowers…In a post on social media Trump said, ‘…Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,’ Trump said.” Some view this as sabre rattling, others as diplomacy through taking a tough stance as in “Peace Through Strength.” Is there an underlying purpose in terms of the alien agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Have you asked Source Creator for technical help? I did a couple of times and my laptop battery got healed. It was so fun to see! Source Creator is the best engineer there is. Right now I have trouble with my wife’s car. I help her as much as I can but this problem eludes me and this technician, too. If he starts to change parts from the start, this repair could go so expensive that it would be easier to sell this car (cheap 3000 eur little car). The thing is that the engine stutters on idle, revs a little, and it’s not pulling on low revs like before. The mechanic agreed that this could be due to a bad fuel mixture or an air leak. He excluded electrical circuits. Can I get a little Divine help on this matter?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
82 views0 answers0 votes
The news reported on September 28, 2025, a Mormon church in Michigan on fire following an active shooter incident, leaving multiple victims. The incident happened at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Grand Blanc. Police Chief Brian Lipe said: “What we know right now is that a 40-year-old suspect from Burton, he’s a male. He drove his vehicle through the front doors of the church. He then exited his vehicle, firing several rounds at individuals within the church. Ten gunshot victims have been transported to local hospitals at this time.” Four have since died. Police engaged with and killed the shooter at the scene. He was an ex-marine veteran of the Iraq War. What was the motive for this brazen attack?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old from Utah, has been identified as the shooter who killed conservative spokesman and devout Christian, Charlie Kirk, during his debate with attendees at a recent college campus gathering. Robinson was persuaded by his father and a pastor to turn himself in. What caused him to become an assassin? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
There are still conflicting views and opinions about the DoD Directive 5240.01, reissued on September 27, 2024. Some quoting official sources claim, adamantly, that it grants no new power to the Defense Department and does not grant legal authority for the military to use lethal force on civilians. Others maintain that the directive now permits lethal force in cases of imminent threats or national security emergencies. Concerns are further dismissed by pointing out that lethal force can only be used with express authority of the Secretary of Defense, as though that could never be granted. A further contingency was included to allow immediate action for a 72-hour period, without such authorization. Is this just routine planning or is this a sinister manipulation to enhance potential future governmental control over citizens?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
42 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “On the point about AI monitoring of our communications, I usually dictate my questions to you with my Android phone using the Google keyboard/dictation app. Would typing things in on the computer be more discreet?” What is most important for him to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Through the NDE of Tyler Morrison, Creator verified the legitimacy of Jesus’s message of warning about Elon Musk’s Neuralink implants that will be rolled out and, through mind control, people will be jumping over each other to get one, and for those that don’t get them they’ll be blacklisted, have their power turned off, etc. This dream was in 2023. Is this still planned to move forward with this kind of “do or die” veracity? Jesus said this will specifically target the younger generations. Having two teenagers myself, I will add more intention in my prayers and LHP-DSMR sessions if this is deemed necessary.” What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
61 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I appreciated the Get Wisdom show about AI on Friday and I happen to know that communications that use Google and other forms of voice recognition are analyzed by AI for the large language models. Is that a risk to the security of Get Wisdom?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
It has been reported that the US government has accumulated a hoard of Bitcoin worth 15-20 billion dollars through confiscation of illegal funds. This hoarding was launched by Pres. Trump who halted what would have been ongoing sales to convert Bitcoin to cash. Is this a sinister move, in order to create a way to trigger collapse of that asset by dumping a large amount of Bitcoin on the market to start a collapse at some point in the future?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
163 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
130 views0 answers0 votes
The term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
When people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
157 views0 answers0 votes
An argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
168 views0 answers0 votes
Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
204 views0 answers0 votes
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
165 views0 answers0 votes
123…23Next »
Ask Question