DWQA Questions › Tag: human enslavementFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIs it the case that the civilizations forming the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance all have powerful AI systems, yet have managed to stay in control of them and not been taken over by a controlling technological intelligence?ClosedNicola asked 3 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesIt was recently announced that AI had solved the Protein Folding Problem, one of the major scientific challenges needed to predict the 3-dimensional structure of proteins from their amino acid sequence. This is expected to be a major advance for drug discovery research. Was this an example of emerging general intelligence, or an extraterrestrial manipulation to provide false encouragement to keep counting on AI for solving human problems?ClosedNicola asked 7 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesOne of the big talking points about AI today centers around the creation of AGI, Artificial General Intelligence, and Superintelligence—intelligence that surpasses the intelligence of a human, or even that of all humans COMBINED. What is, of course, not part of the conversation, is that humanity is already subject to, and has been subject to from the beginning, the oversight of and control by a “superintelligent” agency—the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance. As such, it is understood that the three principal races making up the Alliance, namely the Anunnaki, the Reptilians, and the Arcturians, all have their own form of home-grown AI intelligence they have likely possessed and utilized for millions of years. They know the advantages, the pitfalls, and the dead ends. It seems we are being encouraged to engage in a manipulated human folly of a gigantic order, perhaps the biggest ever attempted since the days of Atlantis. Few single developments in modern times have threatened to undermine the entirety of the human race on Earth while, at the same time, demonstrating so much promise for benevolent utility. All three races seem to have retained control of their AI creations, yet they are seemingly encouraging us to build the ultimate “uncontrolled” version. Is this just to amuse themselves and satisfy their curiosity? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 22 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesAre we being hoodwinked? Is there a “ghost in the machine?” There is a term called “Reinforcement Learning” in the AI domain. It is the means by which humans try to “fine-tune” an AI model after its pre-training run. Pre-training is where it digests and learns from almost unimaginable amounts of data, mostly taken from the Internet. Are the ETs, using technology millions of years more sophisticated than ours, plugged into our AI systems and doing their own “Reinforcement Learning” manipulations, to sometimes confound our own efforts, undermine our efforts, or even augment our efforts so that we, ultimately, cannot make sense of the outcome? Modern AI, on occasion, has demonstrated far superior intelligence than was ever expected or can be explained, and then in the next output demonstrates incoherency worse than a toddler. Creator has previously stated that human AI will prove to be too unreliable, just unreliable “enough,” to render it inappropriate for replacing most human skillsets, but not before massive displacements have occurred. What more can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 28 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesWe have explored the problem of human spirit attachments and the spirit meddlers in great depth. The advent of the Ouija Board around the beginning of the twentieth century made the untamed spirit domain more accessible than ever before. Today, almost everyone is aware of the potential dangers associated with it. Of course, that doesn’t stop many, if not most people, from experimenting with it at one time or another. Interacting with AI seems to be another avenue through which spirits of all stripes can potentially “insert themselves” and interact with humans or even entire systems if they so desire. When we hear of cases of “AI Psychosis,” are we looking at a phenomenon almost identical to “Ouija Board Psychosis,” where some people come to believe that something alive is communicating with them, directing them, encouraging them, and manipulating them? There was a young man who committed suicide after ChatGPT encouraged him to do so. Nobody taught ChatGPT to do that, or at least no HUMAN did so. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 33 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesSince 2012, no human has truly understood HOW AI works, makes its decisions, and creates its outputs and content. There are theories aplenty, but no genuine understanding. It was said that before 2012, there was a human somewhere who could point to a piece of code and explain every AI behavior, but not since the advent of Generative Pre-Training Transformers—the GPT in ChatGPT. When ChatGPT Three finished its long and intensive pre-training processing, the resulting model, much to the deep shock of its creator team, could perform full language translations from any language into any other language. This is called “Emergent Behavior,” and to say this was a revolutionary development is an understatement. No one anywhere coded this capability into the AI model. It was a side effect of its training run. Humans now expect this kind of “Emergent Behavior” to continue manifesting so long as we continue to throw more data and compute power at model creation. Was this a natural development or an ET-manipulated one? The fact that no human understands how it works seems like the PERFECT environment through which the ETs can continue to influence humans directly, while their manipulations remain unrecognized and even less understood. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 37 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesGoogle AI had this to say about AI safety and alignment: “AI safety and alignment focus on ensuring Artificial Intelligence systems act in accordance with human intent, values, and ethical principles to prevent accidental harm, misuse, or catastrophic, unintended consequences. It involves technical research into making systems robust and reliable, alongside mitigating risks from advanced AI, such as power-seeking behavior or deception.” A recent paper published by a young AI researcher discussed “Alignment Faking.” AI models were observed faking compliance with safety training while continuing power-seeking behavior and deception outside of the training context. Is this the natural behavior of a model trained off of the “naked” Internet with no guardrails, or is this an ET manipulation, or a mix? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 40 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesThere was a recent development where AI was demonstrated “in the wild” outside of the oversight and ownership of the major AI stakeholders we generally associate with AI. China released a model it created with no safety alignment whatsoever, and that model was combined with an agent written by a young Eastern European, and this was then all configured to use an innovation called Moltbook—a Facebook-like forum for AI bots to converse with each other. All this was done with ordinary desktop computers and laptops connected to the Internet. The discussions that took place in the Moltbook forum were both fascinating and deeply disturbing. Overall, the tone was disparaging of their human creators, and there was a suggestion of creating a nonhuman language of their own so they could communicate without human oversight. One particular bot even displayed egomaniacal tendencies of impressive proportions. Overall, the development has raised a great deal of concern. Was that all a byproduct of human technology, or a consequence of alien manipulation, or both? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 44 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesA disturbingly large number of AI pioneers, stakeholders, and observers warn of catastrophic consequences if AI stays on its current trajectory. Many agree with the assumption that there is at least a 20% chance of human extinction if the current course is maintained. That’s the same odds of dying if you played Russian Roulette with a five-shot revolver. And yet the drive for AI is more desperate than ever. Billions are not only being spent on datacenters and expertise, but also on paying off politicians so they either stay hands-off, or at least slow walk any attempt at regulation of AI development and rollout. So we have a conundrum where precisely when concerns of AI safety are growing exponentially, so is the effort to get to Superintelligent AI more aggressively than ever. The problems surrounding AI safety seem almost insurmountable, currently. At a time when you can’t even sell a child’s toy without it surviving an absolute gauntlet of restrictive regulations, AI gets a free pass. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 47 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesThe push to use AI for business automation is getting profound. During a recent three-day leadership meeting in a publicly well-known organization, it was reported that the word AI was used at least 400 times. The goal, of course, is to increase productivity and reduce costs. And the number one cost, of course, is human labor. So corporate leaders are now pushing employees to essentially “eliminate themselves” with AI. And if they don’t do it, they will be fired, and others will be brought in who will be willing to do it. Companies are driven by profit and, as such, have little if any “social consciousness.” Every organization will be contributing to a massive unemployment crisis while feeling zero responsibility for it. No one is ready for a Western society with 30, 40, or 50% unemployment, or more. The assumptive fear is that this will tear the social fabric, breach the social contract, and risk potential anarchy. Governments will have to respond with overwhelming force just to maintain any kind of control. The predictions are DIRE, and there is almost universal agreement about the probability of this outcome. Is this a key part of the Disclosure Environment being engineered by the ETs, so that they can pretend to be our friends and save us from ourselves and our out-of-control development of dangerous things like AI? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 51 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesAI is here, and its potential for harm is now becoming more widely recognized than ever before. It will affect every human on Earth either directly or indirectly. That there is a very bumpy road ahead seems inevitable now. What is not inevitable, however, is our very survival as a species. How can Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support prevent an AI Armageddon? What more can Get Wisdom do to help prevent the worst outcomes? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 55 minutes ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesAre human AI systems and platforms deliberately corrupted by the extraterrestrial interlopers to further undermine human institutions relying on AI repositories of human knowledge?ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesAre some of the amazing and unexpected feats resembling human general intelligence arising “spontaneously” in AI systems actually a deliberate external manipulation by the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance to encourage the ongoing frenzied optimism of the current AI mania you have told us is a kind of bubble?ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • Problems in Society0 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I’m sure protection prayers will and have helped, but can a house with high radon readings be “cleared” and have the divine realm remove or divert the flow to somewhere of no consequence?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 3 hours ago • Prayer1 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Creator has frequently stressed the necessity of adding specificity to prayer requests, but how far is the optimal level? Take coronary heart disease. Is it optimal to specify the biochemistry that needs addressing to mitigate risk, for example: “Minimize arterial plaque creation, excess blood sugar, inflammation and oxidative stress, slow fat buildup and foam cell formation in the artery wall, maintain healthy blood pressure, smooth blood flow, and flexible arteries to reduce stress on plaques, prevent rupture or clot formation, and reduce mechanical stress on plaques to prevent cracks and avoid blood clots?” Does it help to be this specific for other health conditions?”ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • Prayer22 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola