DWQA Questions › Tag: human wellbeing
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A review article shows little or no benefit of supplementing patients with vitamin D3 for bone fractures (T. Gatt, A. Grech, and H. Arshad. The effect of Vitamin D supplementation for bone healing in fracture patients: a systematic review. Adv. Orthopedics Volume 2023, Article ID 6236045). However, the supplement doses of vitamin D3 were either low, 800-2000 IU daily, or quite high loading doses orally or systemically of 100,000 to 300,000 IU. Was their negative assessment justified or were the studies flawed? Would taking a 5000 to 10,000 IU dose of vitamin D3 daily, give significant benefit for healing bone fractures?
ClosedNicola asked 19 hours ago • 
5 views0 answers0 votes
A systematic review of 416 medical journal articles affirmed a strong association between higher serum vitamin D levels and a lower risk of bladder, breast, colon, endometrial, esophageal, gallbladder, kidney, ovarian, pancreatic, rectal, stomach, and vulvar cancers, as well as Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The review also uncovered lower risks of metastasis and mortality from cancer in patients with higher levels of vitamin D. While vitamin D levels of 20 ng/ml (50 nmol/L) were adequate for bone and muscle health, reduction of cancer risk and mortality required levels greater than 40 ng/ml (100 nmol/L) and fell further with levels above 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/L). The review cautioned that studies showing no benefit for those taking less than 5,000 IU per day might be misleading. [Wimalawansa SJ. Vitamin D’s impact on cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2025 Jul 16;17(14):2333. Doi: 10.3390/nu17142333.] Is this a fair summary of vitamin D benefits for limiting incidence and severity of cancer?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that 5000 IU of vitamin D3 taken twice a day would be safe and helpful for many, many people. Is that enough to get serum levels in a useful range for cancer prevention?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
4 views0 answers0 votes
Studies have shown that vitamin D levels have an inverted U-shaped curve, where low levels (<29.7 nmol/L) result in shortened telomeres on DNA, a sign of aging, but so do high levels of vitamin D (>95.9 nmol/L). Population-based studies and randomized clinical trials have shown a U- or J-shaped curve and suggested an increased risk of adverse outcomes in those with the highest serum Vitamin D levels, including falls, fractures, and frailty. Most studies have reported a higher risk in those participants with serum levels above 100 nmol/L. Are the deleterious effects noted in these studies caused by elevated vitamin D? If so, your support for taking 5,000 to 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 daily seems risky. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
3 views0 answers0 votes
How effective is the Primal Force supplement, Telo X Nano, for adding to longevity?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
57 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Would I benefit from taking Telo X Nano? I am taking nearly all the ingredients except for arginine alpha ketoglutarate and carnosine, although not in the “nano” form promoted by Primal Force as achieving better bioavailability.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
Given the recent paper showing a good anticancer effect of both grape seed extract and vitamin C in a mouse model of solid Ehrlich carcinoma, would either or both be a safe and effective addition to our Antiviral Regimen?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that taking 2,000 IU of vitamin D3 is safe and very helpful, because the Recommended Daily Allowance, as with many essential nutrients, is way too low. I have seen doctor recommendations that say when health issues are present it is meaningful and safe to take as much as 10,000 IU of vitamin D3. I have been taking 5,000 IU twice a day. Is that safe and useful for me and others? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What can you tell us about the benefits versus risk factors in taking the bone medication Evenity? Cost is high, but insurance can help. Can you tell us if it is highest and best to take this or if it would be better to continue LHP-DSMR healing requests without outside chemical interventions? Side effects with this drug are concerning.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
Is the “Brain Song” being advertised as able to enhance memory by stimulating Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor after 17 minute listening sessions, truly effective and superior to other, routine, cognitive exercises, such as listening to music, playing an instrument, tackling demanding creative decision-making tasks, etc?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
34 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Recently I started taking a sulforaphane supplement by the name of Broq and within two weeks I noticed surprising benefits. My energy levels have been slightly elevated along with my mood, my hair shedding has returned to normal levels and my complexion has improved. Does sulforaphane have anti-viral properties or is the sulforaphane working somewhere downstream to mitigate symptoms and damage caused by chronic viral infections? Can sulforaphane provide broad benefits to a majority of people by protecting against various forms of cancer, prevent cardiovascular disease, reduce symptoms of autism, and slow aging or are these claims exaggerations?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
172 views0 answers0 votes
Am I taking too much vitamin D3? Dr. Sears recommends 2000 IU daily. I am taking two 5000 IU gelcaps. Is it better to take half at noon and half at night, or is taking two together wasteful?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
143 views0 answers0 votes
Is the vitamin D3 I am taking going to waste unless I take a more absorbable form of zinc, like zinc acetate?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
84 views0 answers0 votes
The trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and a prior myocardial infarction (MI) was reported in September, 2024. While there was a significant reduction in circulating heavy metals following months of weekly intravenous EDTA infusions, there was not a significant reduction in cardiovascular events or mortality. You told us previously that EDTA therapy was actually beneficial, as the first TACT study showed, but that the interlopers were suppressing beneficial clinical data. Is that the reason for the failed confirmation with the TACT2 follow-up?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
329 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is Mirror Life Microbe research an interloper technology existing within their own societies or is this directed at humans only (as so many other things)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
248 views0 answers0 votes
123…9Next »
Ask Question