DWQA Questions › Tag: Jesus ChristFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSuccessful Hollywood Film Producer Paul Davids and Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona, who has spent much of his career scientifically studying whether human consciousness survives death and if mediumship is authentic, have co-authored a 2016 book entitled An Atheist in Heaven. Paul Davids was good friends with the late Forrest J. Ackerman who is the subject atheist of the book. Forrest was known for saying he did not believe in life after death, but if it turned out he was wrong, he would “drop them a line.” It turns out Forrest (known to his friends as “Forry”) ended up dropping many lines to many people, as the book shares in great detail. One such incident was with a filmmaker from Canada who attended Forry’s memorial service. Afterwards, this filmmaker went to Forry’s crypt and knocked on the marble, saying out loud, “Uncle Forry, hi, it’s us, Michael and Ian, we’ve come to show our movie about you at the tribute for you.” They returned to their hotel room where Mike wanted to update a Facebook blog. This required a CAPTCHA code readable by humans but not computers. To Michael’s astonishment, the code that came up was “Ackerman000.” Michael felt this was a direct response to knocking on Forry’s crypt. A few moments later, Michael’s friend Ian blurted out, “Is he really dead?” The following sentence is verbatim from the book: “At that moment, the second phenomenon occurred, this time from Ian’s computer. A voice blurted out the words, ‘Oh my God, no way!'” Was Forry doing this? Was he in the light at the time, or still in limbo? And how does all this fit within the rules of engagement? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm112 views0 answers0 votesWhile researching this topic, Brian was watching the documentary film by Paul Davids, The Life After Death Project. On a coffee table next to Brian was his iPad in sleep mode. Suddenly, the iPad woke up spontaneously out of sleep mode, and a childlike voice blurted out the words, “I think you’re pretty great, too!” The iPad promptly went back into sleep mode. Brian immediately recognized how this was a nearly identical incident that occurred to filmmaker Ian described in the question just discussed. The voice was described as “childlike” in that occurrence as well. Years ago, in the 1980s, Brian was doing some experimental channeling with a friend when the spirit being channeled told Brian, “You have the opportunity to be great …” Was Forry referring to that channeling from decades ago? Why would Forry think Brian was “pretty great, too?” When Forry got to the light, did he, too, learn about the Get Wisdom Project and take an interest in it, even reviewing the akashic records of its founders? Did Forry think Brian was “pretty great” because of the Spirit Rescue and Lightworker Healing Protocol session work he did for him? What can Creator tell us about this occurrence, why those words were chosen, and how it all fits into the rules of engagement?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm30 views0 answers0 votesIn 2015, a séance was held in Forry’s former home, affectionately known as the “Ackermansion,” where Forry was a huge collector of Science Fiction memorabilia and essentially ran an informal museum of sorts when he lived there. Forrest Ackerman invented the term “Sci-fi” and was the founder and editor of the famous film genre magazine, Famous Monsters of Filmland, which was a huge favorite with teenagers in the late fifties and sixties. Steven Spielberg is counted among those who thought Forry was “pretty great.” He inspired an entire generation of famous filmmakers, authors, and special effects wizards. In that séance, it was asked what he (Forry) and other spirits were doing with their time. From the book, “What big project are they working on? Well, one must expend much energy to communicate with us (us incarnate humans that is), or to try to make their presence known, although the interest in communicating with us is substantial. So they, on the other side, are actively doing research, looking for ways to make communication between us and them easier and more efficient.” Were all the spirits attending that séance, including Forry Ackerman, still in limbo? For if they were in the light, they would know the rules of engagement, and that direct communication between spirits and humans was something strictly limited as it interferes with free will, and especially the free will of doubters to embrace their disbelief without overwhelming proof forcing the removal of all skepticism. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm90 views0 answers0 votesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm59 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm49 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm18 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm39 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • Divine Realm49 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “May I ask Creator why doesn’t Blessed Mother Mary include the alien agenda in her apparitions and include them in her prayers said for humanity instead of messages of holding her son back from punishing us and blaming humanity only for all the wrong behavior in the world?”ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm176 views0 answers0 votesIs the video of Tyler James Morrison, a 14-year-old who says he had a near-death experience and spoke to Jesus in 2023, a true and accurate account? Did Jesus truly warn him about Elon Musk’s Neuralink chip, that it was a sinister mind-capture technology to be avoided? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers75 views0 answers0 votesDr. Elaine Pagels, a Professor of Religion at Princeton University, wrote a book called The Origins of Satan. She wrote: “In the Hebrew Bible, as in mainstream Judaism to this day, Satan never appears as Western Christendom has come to know him, as the leader of an ‘evil empire,’ an army of hostile spirits who make war on God and humankind alike.” She further writes, “In biblical sources, the Hebrew term the satan describes an adversarial role. Although Hebrew storytellers as early as the sixth century B.C.E. occasionally introduced a supernatural character whom they called the satan, what they meant was any one of the angels sent by God for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity.” We know Creator has said that a literal “Satan” does not exist, but is rather more of a literary composite figure. We know the fallen Archangel Lucifer is often thought of as “Satan,” but if indeed they are synonymous, why wouldn’t Creator just say that Satan was simply another name for Lucifer? How much of the crucifixion narrative can be directly attributed to Lucifer himself? Or is he given too much credit and we need to look beyond Lucifer for the leaders of the ‘evil empire’ as Professor Pagels characterized the real adversary in the crucifixion narrative? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers157 views0 answers0 votesDr. Elaine Pagels wrote: “All of the New Testament gospels, with considerable variation, depict Jesus’ execution as the culmination of the struggle between good and evil – between God and Satan – that began at his baptism.” Some material has suggested that the baptism was not merely symbolic, but that a profound spiritual transformation took place during the baptism; that the old soul “Jesus of Nazareth” was replaced by the “Christ spirit,” and that after the baptism Jesus was essentially a “walk-in.” Other than his birth and temple visit as a twelve-year-old, there is virtually nothing in the Bible that tells us what he did between the ages of 12 and 30 when he essentially began his ministry following his baptism. What can Creator tell us about the significance of his baptism by John the Baptist, and is there anything important to know about his years spent prior to that? Some sources suggest he was in India for much of that time period. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers142 views0 answers0 votesDr. Pagels wrote, “The stark events of Jesus’ life and death cannot be understood, he (the Gospel of Mark author) suggests, apart from the clash of supernatural forces that Mark sees being played out on earth in Jesus’ lifetime. Mark intends to tell the story of Jesus in terms of its hidden, deeper dynamics – to tell it, so to speak, from God’s point of view. What happened Mark says, is this: ‘Jesus of Nazareth, after his baptism, was coming out of the water of the Jordon River when “he saw the heavens torn apart and the spirit descending like a dove on him” and heard a voice speaking to him from heaven. God’s power anointed Jesus to challenge the forces of evil that now dominate the world, and drove him into direct conflict with those forces.'” Following the baptism, the mysterious narrative describes him immediately being “driven” into the wilderness, and he was in the wilderness forty days being tempted by Satan. Given that Creator has said Satan is a composite figure only, what REALLY took place in the desert during those forty days? How would Creator today characterize the adversary that Jesus struggled with and against, and what was the nature of that struggle? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers57 views0 answers0 votesDr. Pagels wrote, “Mark suggests that Jesus recognizes that the leaders who oppose him are energized by unseen forces.” Given the extraordinary powers Jesus possessed, he would almost certainly know who those unseen forces were. Today we know from Creator’s words that it is Anunnaki psychics interacting with humans directly, Anunnaki psychics directing lost soul Anunnaki spirits to attack humans in hit-and-run style encounters, while also instructing the Anunnaki lost soul spirits to enlist and command the fallen angelic spirit meddlers to attack and attach themselves and even directly possess human beings. Jesus is said to have driven seven demonic spirits out of Mary Magdalene—one for each of her seven major chakras. Was Jesus aware at that time that he was going against a galactic empire of extraterrestrials with mastery of time and space? Creator did say the Bible was primarily a whistleblowing document on the extraterrestrial problem. Jesus clearly knew that back in the light. Was his struggle in the desert a coming to terms with remembrance of what he was really up against, what he needed to do, and how it would likely play out? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers164 views0 answers0 votesThe widespread narrative is, of course, that the Romans crucified an innocent man. But innocent of what? Because, if anything, Jesus was extraordinarily politically incorrect. Dr. Pagels wrote, “The astonished crowds recognize that Jesus possesses a special authority, direct access to God’s power. … the scribes immediately took offense at what they considered his usurpation of divine authority. By pronouncing forgiveness, Jesus claims the right to speak for God – a claim that, Mark says, angers the scribes: ‘Why does this man speak this way? It is blasphemy! Who can forgive sins but God alone? Instead of fasting, like other devout Jews, Jesus ate and drank freely. And instead of scrupulously observing Sabbath laws, Jesus excused his disciples when they broke them. Claiming divine and royal power while simultaneously violating the purity laws, Jesus, at the beginning of his public activity, outrages virtually every party among his contemporaries, from the disciples of John the Baptist to the scribes and Pharisees.'” We are faced with the conundrum of Jesus “speaking truth to power.” The hazards of which are so visibly and starkly apparent from human history, that his eventual crucifixion was not only NOT a surprise but, in fact, an almost near certainty. Anyone wishing to follow his example and engage in speaking “truth to power,” as he did, is not likely to avoid a similar life-threatening fate. What lessons are we to best derive from this? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers144 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola