DWQA Questions › Tag: life lessonsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThe term, “Achilles’ heel” is commonly used to represent one’s most vulnerable spot or weakness that could bring about a downfall. Greek mythology describes the tragic weakness of Achilles, a powerful figure in the Trojan War, dying from a mortal wound to his heel. Was that based on a true story of a military leader felled by extraterrestrial manipulation of what is now called the Achilles’ tendon, which can produce a crippling injury when ruptured?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control82 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Medieval Italian poet Dante Alighieri (1265 – 1321) is best known for his masterpiece “The Divine Comedy,” which describes a journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Paradise; in the journey, he is first guided by the Roman poet Virgil and then by Beatrice, his true love. This work is now regarded as a foundation of Western art and literature. How accurate is this map of the afterlife? Does it reflect the destiny of certain souls?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers103 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Was Dante really visited by spirits from the spirit world? To what extent did Creator inspire this vision, or was it just a version of religious dogma of the time?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers87 views0 answers0 votesA news report said: “San Francisco 49ers linebacker Dre Greenlaw’s leg gave out at the most devastating of moments. As Greenlaw prepared to run back onto the field for another Niners defensive series with 9:26 left in the second quarter of Sunday’s 25-22 Super Bowl LVIII overtime loss to the Kansas City Chiefs, he injured his left leg. Coach Kyle Shanahan confirmed after the game that Greenlaw tore his Achilles tendon. As often happens with Achilles injuries, Greenlaw’s came without contact and at the most inopportune of times. The Niners had just punted the ball back to the Chiefs before Greenlaw and his defensive teammates were about to go back on the field.” He reportedly had suffered Achilles tendonitis during recent games, but is that really a normal vulnerability, to have the Achilles tendon just give way, “without contact and at the most inopportune of times?” Is there anything sinister about this?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control41 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem helper types are not good at being alone for long stretches. As cruel as solitary confinement is, it might be the most cruel to do that to a helper. Helpers have a need to be around people and even animals. Yet, are also often aware of their shortcomings as not being as gabby as orators, or as entertaining and interesting as artists, athletes, researchers, etc. This would fuel their desire to be “useful” and be the ones walking around with the coffee pot asking if anyone wants a refill (when all their cups were already full!). What advice can Creator give to others on how to best understand, value, and reward the helper types in their lives without compromising their own needs and wants, and not coming up short in the process?ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • Human Potential29 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I had a Deep Subconscious Trauma Resolution session done for my teen son a few years ago which gave me a feedback recording of some of his troubling lives. My heart poured out for him as I learned of traumatic lives where he was tortured by ETs and where he died homeless. Now, he’s 18 and I am at a fork in the road. I have to move because I am struggling to pay for rent and bills. I’d like to have my son with me and yet he’s not going to college, not working aside from a few side jobs and he’s disrespectful to me. I told him I can only afford a 1 bedroom unless he contributes for a 2nd and he replied it’s not his job to help me. If I move without him I’m afraid I’ll be abandoning him and he’ll be homeless. He won’t live with his father.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Divine Guidance57 views0 answers0 votesArriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma69 views0 answers0 votesWe know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma53 views0 answers0 votesThe Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma50 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma50 views0 answers0 votesWe know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma50 views0 answers0 votesWe know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma38 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma21 views0 answers0 votesCreator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma42 views0 answers0 votesThere is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • Karma28 views0 answers0 votes