DWQA Questions › Tag: mental health
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
A newsletter from Ty and Charlene Bollinger titled “The Epstein Files: Exposing Satanic Globalist Pedophiles Raping, Torturing, and Eating Babies?” says: “The people in charge aren’t merely corrupt. They’re not merely criminals. They’re cannibal pedophiles engaged in active spiritual warfare against everything pure, everything innocent, everything good.” They claim that the Department of Justice has a video showing Hillary Clinton and her friend, Huma Abedin, torturing a young girl prior to harvesting her tissues for consuming adrenochrome, as has been described a number of times is a routine practice by global elites wanting to gain longevity from the practice. Is there such a video and is it being accurately depicted?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
290 views0 answers0 votes
Are the basic allegations true, that there are many emails in the released Epstein files referring to child trafficking through code words, including adrenochrome harvesting through cannibalism?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
172 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Is the whistleblowing email I received some time ago, with documents listing children enslaved and their harvested post-torture blood for sale, connected to this same large-scale enterprise?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will this practice of child enslavement and their harvested post-torture blood for sale be revealed during the coming Alien Disclosure as shocking evidence of corruption in our midst, with blaming of the Reptilian extraterrestrials and their influence?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
141 views0 answers0 votes
Is the video authentic they show of Jeffrey Epstein torturing a naked young girl staked out on the ground, by burning her with sunlight through a magnifying glass?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
147 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “It appears that part of the ET agenda is to immerse the public in the disturbing sexual perversions of high-level figures lately. For those who want to be in spiritual alignment this feels like a kind of attack to try and darken as many as possible. Is there heavy mind control associated with these disturbing revelations to try and darken humanity? I feel a need to be cautious in what I choose to watch online.”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
160 views0 answers0 votes
There has been growing interest in studying the more than 400 unique substances found in Cannabis extracts, including not only cannabinoids but terpenes, which have been found to have therapeutic benefits, including antiviral and anticancer activity, and are devoid of psychoactive properties like the delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in marijuana. [Cannabis as antivirals. Yi Lin Sea 1, et al. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023 Jan 23;134(1)] As Cannabidiol is the most prominent non-psychoactive cannabinoid, it has been promoted by some who are following the usual mindset that it is best to purify a single, and hopefully the most potent, substance from a given plant extract. Is a wide-spectrum hemp extract preferable to purified cannabidiol both as an antiviral as well as anticancer agent?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
Cannabis has been highly controversial for a long time, due to its abuse potential, and medical marijuana continues to be attacked and discredited as lacking medical benefits. Having sought and asked about many plant extracts as having useful anticancer and especially antiviral activity, knowing now that viruses cause the majority of cancers, it was surprising to see that wide-spectrum hemp extracts containing cannabinoids have so far come out on top when we have asked you to rank various nutraceuticals. Have we missed something greatly superior?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
90 views0 answers0 votes
Is the supplement for enhancing mental sharpness from Immunocorp, called Acuitol, a safe and effective way to enhance mental functioning? Does it truly have something unique to offer from its proprietary blend of phytonutrients, in addition to the group of vitamins it contains?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
117 views0 answers0 votes
123…33Next »
Ask Question