DWQA Questions › Tag: misdirection
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Now that I have taken the 3-week ivermectin/hydroxychloroquine administration, can I safely cut back frequency of taking the Antiviral Regimen to twice a week, to save costs? A middle ground would be to reduce the frequency for all ingredients but the Cannabitol 5000 and chaga, while continuing to take them daily? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
Green Valley Naturals is offering a supplement called Bone and Muscle Defense they claim both strengthens bones as well as rebuilding muscle mass. It contains Vitamin D3, calcium, magnesium, calcium -hydroxy--methylbutyrate, L-carnitine, Cuscuta chinensis, Cnidium monnieri, and vitamin K2 as menaquinone-7. Is this safe, effective, and of significant value for helping those with aging-related bone, joint, and muscle loss issues?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
You have said that the Advanced Muscle Plus supplement from Advanced Bionutritionals can be used along with their Advanced Amino Formula to “…be a powerful one-two knockout combination that will be quite effective for many wanting to regain lost muscle mass and strength.” How would you rank this duo with taking the Bone and Muscle Defense supplement from Green Valley Naturals?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
Would there be a significant benefit to taking all three supplements [Advanced Muscle Plus, Advanced Amino Formula, and Bone and Muscle Defense] for repairing low bone density, damaged joints, and lost muscle mass?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
Would taking the best combination [of Advanced Muscle Plus, Advanced Amino Formula, and Bone and Muscle Defense] help speed up repair of my painful right shoulder and right hip?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
15 views0 answers0 votes
Is the new supplement from Green Valley Naturals, called Bone & Muscle Defense, a safe and effective way to rebuild bones and joints as well as muscle strength? How would you rank it in comparison to Flexafen and OmegaXL for joint restoration?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
15 views0 answers0 votes
What is the best safe and beneficial combination among these three [Bone & Muscle Defense, Flexafen, and OmegaXL] for promoting musculoskeletal health and function?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
Would this combination, or just Bone & Muscle Defense, also work well along with taking Advanced Muscle Plus and Advanced Amino Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals for countering muscle loss with aging?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Through the NDE of Tyler Morrison, Creator verified the legitimacy of Jesus’s message of warning about Elon Musk’s Neuralink implants that will be rolled out and, through mind control, people will be jumping over each other to get one, and for those that don’t get them they’ll be blacklisted, have their power turned off, etc. This dream was in 2023. Is this still planned to move forward with this kind of “do or die” veracity? Jesus said this will specifically target the younger generations. Having two teenagers myself, I will add more intention in my prayers and LHP-DSMR sessions if this is deemed necessary.” What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
You have said you would not recommend fenbendazole for treating or preventing cancer, but would support use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Andreas Kalcker promotes treatment of cancer using Chlorine Dioxide Solution to first reach a clinical redox plateau, then introduces albendazole/fenbendazole to impose mitotic stress, and then adds ivermectin to quiet excitatory signaling. In this scenario, the fenbendazole is used to block glucose handling by cancer cells to limit energy availability, and destabilize microtubules to hinder cell division. Is his theory sound? Is his timed sequence a more elegant way to utilize fenbendazole effectively to derive benefit?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
161 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “An article [on the Internet] discusses the potential of fenbendazole, a common antiparasitic drug used in veterinary medicine, as a treatment for cancer. Fenbendazole (FBZ) has gained attention due to anecdotal reports suggesting it may have anticancer properties. FBZ may also enhance the efficacy of traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. FBZ though has no clinical literature as an anti-cancer treatment. How likely is it that FBZ could be a safe and effective anti-cancer treatment given that there are no treatment protocols, dosage, or side effect knowledge?”
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
285 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
114 views0 answers0 votes
The term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
205 views0 answers0 votes
When people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
An argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
150 views0 answers0 votes
123…47Next »
Ask Question