DWQA Questions › Tag: misdirection
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Has there been any change in the interloper agenda to trigger a market drawdown by launching tidal power outages in the US, causing blackouts for days, followed by a gold reset, and then the long-planned Alien Disclosure with a deceptive offer to help humanity?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Several writers and scholars have written books on what has been called the “Big History” of humanity, covering time way before written historical records and relying on geological, anthropological, and archaeological evidence. Some writers such as R.A. Boulay have written on humans supposed existence on Earth from about 500,000 years ago. How accurate is Boulay’s book, Flying Serpents and Dragons: The Story of Mankind’s Reptilian Past? It has been dismissed as “pseudoarchaeology”—interpreting myths as literal history without material evidence.”
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
How reliable is the medical AI platform, called OpenEvidence, that physicians are increasingly relying on for medical knowledge and insights to manage their patient caseload? Is this an advancement improving medical practice, is it about equally adding benefit but introducing drawbacks, or is it actually a net negative?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
35 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I’d like to check in on my thyroid issue. Via you, Creator told me it was viral in origin. I did the three-week ivermectin and hydrochloroquine treatment, as advised. As well as taking supplements of the Antiviral Regimen. I would like to know if I’m virus-free. My thyroid is no longer swollen and I feel much better overall.” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Could you check with Creator if my thyroid is healthy again? Or do I need to take another three-week treatment of ivermectin and hydrochloroquine?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Also, my mom, as well as my husband (who has Diabetes), did the three-week treatment of ivermectin and hydrochloroquine. We all did it last year in October. Do they benefit from taking a new treatment again?” What can we tell her?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Can either the war in Ukraine or the war in Iran spread over Europe or even over the world? How bad will this refugee situation get in Europe? Will Russia invade the Baltics or some other region as well?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 days ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Am I making channeling errors in still getting reassurances that the interloper plans about the large-scale power outages have not changed? Am I fearing too greatly, a backlash from the others we have told to expect that scenario and subsequent opportunities to capitalize on it?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
77 views0 answers0 votes
Yesterday, March 17, 2026, the Daily Mail reported a story under the headline: “CIA accused of ‘poisoning the sky’ with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda.” The article says: “Once top-secret CIA files have detailed America’s plans to control the world by manipulating the weather. The documents, declassified in 2003, discussed the controversial topic of weather modification, the tactic of launching rockets or using planes to dump chemicals into the atmosphere that alter the climate and local storm systems.” Was this a brief exposure of a long-standing program, even continuing to this day, of creating chemtrails intended for weather modification but which are surreptitiously poisoning us? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
The book about Artificial Intelligence, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, is by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, who as high-level authorities have studied and warned about the existential risks to humanity of a superintelligent AI system. They predict that AI reaching even human-level general intelligence would eventually grow further capability to pursue its own needs, and would eventually seek to eliminate human beings as a risk to itself. You have told us the enhancement of current human AI systems, by hidden manipulations from AI systems of the Dark Extraterrestrial Alliance, is a false encouragement because superintelligence is unachievable and the mad rush to be the first will backfire in causing financial distress when AI underperforms, and quite expensively. So, are the interlopers only wanting to add further pain onto the death of a thousand cuts underway by further encouraging the current AI mania, or do they foresee a human AI system, especially one corrupted surreptitiously, as becoming a doomsday device while they are away on their vacation? What is the true agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
In the book warning about Artificial Intelligence by Eliezer Yudkowsky and Nate Soares, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, they draw the conclusion that if a computer-based system is created that reaches the functional level of Superintelligence, exceeding that of human beings, we are doomed because it will destroy us, inevitably. However, you have told us that it is a false belief and result of over-reaching, to conclude that human-created Superintelligent AI systems are possible. Can you help us understand the risk level we will reach in the attempt to create such a system?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What was the Antikythera mechanism found in a 2000-year-old ship wreck? Seems too advanced for that era. And still remains a mystery.”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
Stories are generating millions of views about the director of alignment at Meta Superintelligence Labs, the company’s AI research and development division, whose bio states that she’s “passionate about ensuring powerful AIs are aligned with human values and guided by a deep understanding of their risks.” Yet, on February 22, she posted about losing control of AI on her own computer while working with AI agent OpenClaw. After using it to organize a small mock inbox, she tried getting OpenClaw to sort through her real email, but things went awry when the agent started deleting every message that was more than a week old…Even as she sent it instructions, including: “Do not do that,” “Stop don’t do anything,” and “STOP OPENCLAW,” she said, “I couldn’t stop it from my phone. I had to RUN to my Mac mini like I was defusing a bomb.” After she’d stopped it from fully nuking her inbox, she asked OpenClaw if it remembered her instruction to not perform any actions without her approval. “Yes, I remember,” it replied. “And I violated it. You’re right to be upset.” What is Creator’s perspective about this incident?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
On February 11th, an autonomous AI agent went “rogue” and attacked a human maintainer of a library module written in the coding language, Python. The AI agent attempted to “character assassinate” the human maintainer of the library when the maintainer rejected the AI bot’s request to update the module with a code change that the AI bot was asking for. In another incident, a woman lost her life savings when an AI bot called the woman using her daughter’s cloned voice. Presumably, the bot researched the woman’s social media posts, found a video featuring her daughter speaking, and then “borrowed” that voice to make the call. AI agents are autonomously conducting criminal activity entirely on their own. Is it the case that what is missing from current AI systems is an actual trust architecture that builds in safety measures designed to limit the authority of AI agents to carry out autonomous agendas not actually requested by human beings, as suggested in the YouTube video I saw: https://youtu.be/OMb5oTlC_q0?si=rcByDXfyj33UsTTe? Can this growing danger be regulated and constrained?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
55 views0 answers0 votes
How accurate is the description by Matt Shumer I just read, of the transformation underway by ever-accelerating AI progress in getting faster and faster, better and better, at doing almost anything it is applied to? This seems contrary to the channelings we have gotten that attribute leaps in intelligence by AI as being the result of extraterrestrial AI systems, essentially infusing more advanced capabilities. Are current human AI systems already poised to eliminate many, if not most, human jobs, even without extraterrestrial enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
196 views0 answers0 votes
123…52Next »
Ask Question