DWQA Questions › Tag: misdirection
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In watching a docudrama about the Apollo program working to send astronauts to the moon in the 1960s, I was again moved by the tragic fire that killed 3 astronauts early in the program. They were simply carrying out communication exercises to check equipment in their space capsule that was sitting on the launch pad. In hindsight, having a pure oxygen environment proved to be a greater hazard than expected, when a spark from a frayed electrical wire was believed to have started the fire. Was this just a tragic accident, or was this orchestrated to happen to create a spectacle that hindered and almost killed the space program altogether?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
Comments about the recent remote viewer video I was sent a link for, raise questions about information being passed on that was generated using ChatGPT. Can psychics and channelers who are being corrupted and duped by the interlopers be fed more than usual false information when they use ChatGPT or other internet-based sources of information?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Fusion Nano Circle from DEFY Labs as effective as claimed in giving pain relief to arthritis sufferers by delivering non-thermal far infrared energy topically? Does it help heal the underlying joint damage?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have noticed an ad that assigns hip pain to Gluteal Tendinopathy in women aged 50-75+ to low estrogen due to: Low estrogen after 50 disrupting collagen production – the protein that provides strength and elasticity for your tendons…Causing tendons to weaken and stiffen… leading to more stress and friction in the hip joint. It suggests a product called Provitalize to support hormonal balance and collagen production. Does Provitalize provide the benefits they claim? Could equal or better results be achieved through selected elements of the ingredients? Or another supplier?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank Flexafen in comparison to Collagenix-12, from Cerna Labs, or Collagen Plus from Advanced Bionutritionals, for helping arthritic hip symptoms and healing?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank Provitalize in comparison to Collagenix-12, from Cerna Labs, or Collagen Plus from Advanced Bionutritionals, for helping arthritic hip symptoms and healing?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
Was use of the term “progressive” instead of “liberal,” promoted through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance as a form of propaganda to make people believe that change represents desirable progress, always, when such is not the case? Doesn’t this condition us to overturn the past, even to abandon things that work?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
One of the reasons an atheist might cite for why they don’t believe in God, or at the very least a “loving God,” is the huge number of noxious species of microbial, plant, and animal life on this planet. There are so many that it is practically impossible to catalog them all, and new ones are being discovered on literally a DAILY basis. Scientists estimate the average somewhere between 40-55 new species are discovered each day. Certainly, a percentage of those could be labeled “noxious,” in that they are harmful to humans in some way, either directly or indirectly, through attacking another plant or animal species that is beneficial to humans. Of the 40-55 new species discovered each day, what rough percentage are truly NEW-to-Earth species that have been introduced just in the last decade? How big is this problem, and how long has it been going on? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
198 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about the American Chestnut Tree: “By the 1940s the blight had killed an estimated four billion American chestnut trees nationwide. Where before about a third of all trees in the Smoky Mountains were chestnuts, today even single spindly saplings are rare.” The chestnut blight fungus was supposedly introduced from Asia accidently. To give people an idea of just how tragic this massive loss was, here is a brief description found on forestpathology.org of the value of the chestnut tree: “If you could custom design the ideal tree species, you couldn’t come up with a better one than American chestnut. It was a huge, majestic tree, with a very straight stem. The wood was nearly ideal. As George Hepting has written, ‘Not only was baby’s crib likely made of chestnut, but chances were, so was the old man’s coffin.’ One of its good qualities was high durability. The heartwood could be used in situations where decay was a hazard. The tree was common. It made up about 50% of most eastern hardwood forests. It grew fast and would regenerate itself by root sprouts vigorously. The nuts were edible, not only by wildlife but also by humans. It was an important food source for all. ‘The farmer’s hogs were fattened on chestnuts, and, to no small degree, his children were also.’ Chestnut was also prized as a landscape tree.” If indeed the blight did come from Asia, how long had it been in Asia, and what was its true origin? What can Creator tell us about the tragic loss of the American Chestnut?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
173 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about Zebra Mussels: “Zebra mussels are small, freshwater, bivalve shellfish that were likely brought to the U.S. as stowaways in the ballast water of ships. They are native to the Caspian and Black Seas south of Russia and Ukraine, and have since become widespread in both Europe and the U.S.” The zebra mussel is a problem because it is so prolific. Each female can release up to a million eggs a year. “Biofouling is [an ecological problem] … Zebra mussels will attach to native mussels much like they do docks, boats, and water and power plant intake pipes, and in large enough numbers can prevent the natives from moving, feeding, reproducing, or regulating water properly. The zebra mussels also outcompete the natives for food and space, and because of their fast reproduction can quickly overwhelm a water system. The feeding habits of zebra mussels can also have a drastic impact on an infested lake. Zebra mussels are filter feeders that siphon particles of plankton from the water. They are highly efficient at this, and a large population of mussels can quickly clear the water of almost all floating particles. This change can cause shifts in local food webs, both by robbing food from native species that feed on plankton and also by increasing water clarity and thus making it easier for visual predators to hunt.” The costs to control and clean up zebra mussel infestations is enormous. And the problem never goes away, it can only be managed. This species is so good at causing problems, it couldn’t have been a truly native creature in the Black Sea either. It seems tailor-made for another WORLD and doesn’t belong here at ALL. What is Creator’s perspective, and what kind of environment is a good fit for this creature?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
There have been reports of egg prices soon going as high as twenty dollars a dozen in some locations. This is presumably due to a bird flu epidemic and a government policy of killing entire flocks of egg-laying hens, some numbering in the millions of birds. What is the true origin of bird flu, and is this drastic approach to its management and prevention called for in any way that could be considered rational? What is actually the bigger cause of the egg shortage, the invasive bird flu virus, or possible mind control manipulation surrounding its management? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
Whether a species is invasive or not might depend on a number of factors. The European hare is considered a native species of Europe and a valuable one at that. But the same species imported into Australia has been disastrous. Google has this to say about the problem: “Rabbits are a serious environmental and agricultural pest in Australia. They were introduced for sport hunting in the late 18th century, but their rapid reproduction rate led to millions of rabbits. Rabbits cost the Australian economy over $200 million per year. They compete with livestock for food, damage crops, and destabilize the land. Rabbits overgraze, which can lead to soil erosion, the collapse of indigenous plants, and the decline of native animals. They may have also caused the extinction of several small ground dwelling mammals. Rabbits threaten the survival of more than 300 Australian native species, including 24 critically endangered species.” Are these rabbits truly native to Earth, or are they an interloper-introduced invasive species? If native, then is this a wholly human-created problem, or were the humans who brought them to Australia for “sport” influenced to do that by the interlopers? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
It seems with the advent of modern civilization, global media, and global travel, that the opportunity for the interlopers to introduce large land-based mammalian and reptilian creatures, like lions and crocodiles, has effectively expired. Such an introduction today would draw too much attention and be too much of an anomaly. Not so with anything aquatic or small, as in small insects and even birds. Same with any kind of plant life. So while we’re not being overrun globally with new mammoths and saber-toothed tigers, we are being overrun with almost every other kind of invasive species. Creator has previously commented on the “Beast of Gévaudan,” a very large and very vicious species of wolf. Was this the last time the interlopers tried to seriously introduce such a creature, and did they conclude that the opportunity to do this further had passed? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
149 views0 answers0 votes
It’s becoming clear with multiple recent discoveries that nearly the entire region now covered with Amazon Rainforest was once a great Mayan Empire. Today that empire is literally covered with some of the most noxious and dangerous plant and animal life seen anywhere on the planet. There is so much variety in this region, that even today much of it remains uncatalogued and even undiscovered. But has it always been this way? Did the Mayan Empire truly have to compete with all these aggressive vegetation and dangerous critters? Or was it more temperate and gentle, and only became hostile due to the intervention of the interlopers? The indigenous tribes there are extremely xenophobic. Is that because they are direct descendants of the former destroyed Mayan Empire who escaped to the dangerous jungles just to survive, as they would have perished otherwise? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
160 views0 answers0 votes
Invasive Asian Carp is yet another problem affecting rivers in the United States. This fish is a prolific feeder, like the zebra mussel, and outcompetes native fish and aquatic life. It has the unusual behavior of leaping in vast numbers when the water is disturbed. Many people have been injured and even a few killed as a result. Where and why did this species acquire this unusual behavior? How long has it been here on Earth altogether—decades, centuries, or millennia? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
135 views0 answers1 votes
123…41Next »
Ask Question