DWQA Questions › Tag: morality
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Can you give us a new case study example of an individual or group benefited by the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, for use in an upcoming Divine Life Support webinar (October, 2024)?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Creator has often mentioned moral principles for living and these have historically been presented in major religions, passed on in societies, and are represented again in GetWisdom. However, some say that moral understanding is not best absorbed from authority figures but constructed through personal experiences, interactions, and reflections. Individuals integrate new moral insights with their existing moral beliefs to form a coherent moral perspective. To what extent is it through reflection that individuals assess the consequences of their actions, reconsider their moral principles, and adjust their behavior accordingly? How can LHP practitioners best grow their moral perspectives?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
340 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Many people have behaviors that are unhelpful at best or harmful to themselves or others. People generally know this about themselves but do not make changes. Despite many models of behavior change developed by researchers from psychology, sociology, public health, etc., reflecting a broad range of approaches to understanding and influencing behavior, their effectiveness is often limited and short-lived. What can be learned from these shortcomings and limitations? What is a better perspective and tactics for deeper and more permanent change in, for example, alcohol consumption, exercise, and healthy eating? Would making specific requests targeted at specific behaviors in LHP-DSMR requests be best?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
269 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “‘Peter Pan Syndrome’ labels adults who seem unwilling or unable to take on adult responsibilities. It is characterized by avoidance of responsibility, difficulty in committing to relationships, careers, or life decisions, and prioritizing “freedom.” To what extent is this caused by childhood failures or distress making adulthood seem daunting, and to what extent is this mind control manipulation by subconscious programming from cellphones, WiFi, gaming, etc?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
271 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will karmic healing by the LHP alone be enough to heal those affected by ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?’ Will taking on responsibilities gradually, talking therapies, and encouragement be an effective treatment?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
238 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Should parents set boundaries on expected behaviors and obligations and enforce with consequences when addressing ‘Peter Pan Syndrome?'” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
202 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has previously shared the Ten Divine Principles for Living, suggesting there is an objective morality independent of human thinking which people can become more aware of by studying sacred texts or communicating with Creator. Human secular philosophy has also developed theories on how things should or ought to be based on mainly three perspectives. The first perspective from human secular philosophy is based on rules, duties, and obligations.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
223 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “The second perspective from human secular philosophy is based on happiest outcomes for the greatest number.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
238 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “The third perspective from human secular philosophy is based on what kind of person one should be and how one should live.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
217 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “To what extent are the Divine and Human perspectives irreconcilable?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
232 views0 answers0 votes
He continues: “Is the human philosophy of morality simply misconceived? Is being religiously moral more helpful?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
259 views0 answers0 votes
Can you give us a tutorial explaining the differences between praying to God or another holy figure for personal help, versus attempting to channel divine prophecy, with respect to personal safety and possible corruption by interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
258 views0 answers0 votes
A former intelligence agent started a business coaching people in spy techniques and insights that he believed could be applied to everyday life to help people be more effective in accomplishing whatever it is they set out to do. Like most things in life, these techniques and understandings can be used for good or evil. A match can light a birthday candle or start a forest fire. To the extent that others might use these teachings for harm, how much karmic liability attaches to the teacher? Is this a reason why dangerous knowledge was historically reserved for initiates? And even that would seem to have karmic polarity in that it safeguards the innocent and immature on the one hand, but can also be a means to hoard and deny access to resources that one can argue should be more widely shared. What is Creator’s perspective on the “safe handling” and/or dissemination and sharing of material that is potentially helpful but equally dangerous?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
342 views0 answers0 votes
Intelligence agencies are in the business of gathering intelligence—information that is difficult to attain through ordinary means; information that people are hesitant and resistant to give up or share. The successful intelligence agent will employ the tools of motivation and manipulation to get this information. These tools are matched to particular means with which to motivate and/or manipulate people to get them to do what you want them to do. These approaches are referred to with the acronym “R.I.C.E.” Reward, Ideology, Coercion, and Ego. Of these four, appealing to ideology is seen as the most effective, and coercion the least. If you successfully appeal to ideology, the “target” will trust you and share almost anything. Coercion is the weakest as, contrary to Hollywood, it may work the first time you use it, but then you destroy trust and will have fewer opportunities for future success with the target. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
247 views0 answers0 votes
While being trained as an intelligence officer, this individual learned he was an ideal candidate because he was special (clearly an appeal to ego), or at least that is what he thought. But, in fact, he learned he was special because he had been algorithmically identified as psychologically damaged and traumatized in particular ways that were useful for intelligence gathering. These are people one would rarely label “well adjusted” by society’s standards. The agency was ruthlessly honest in telling him they intended to leverage that dysfunction, give him a vocabulary for understanding the nuances of human motivation and manipulation, and techniques for achieving goals and agendas with targets. In this undertaking, the overall wellbeing of the target is not a top consideration and moral flexibility was a prized capacity for successful agents. What is Creator’s perspective on the moral flexibility so highly prized by intelligence agencies?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
233 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…13Next »
Ask Question