DWQA Questions › Tag: nutritional supplements
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “Are contact lenses generally safe, or are there inherent risks to be aware of? If there are risks, how can they be mitigated?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have been wearing glasses since I was young. I suspect I actually didn’t need them, but it was foisted on me due to a concerned family friend who raised the alarm to my parents when I complained of not being able to see the blackboard from the back of the classroom. I think this was a temporary fluctuation in vision acuity, but the glasses themselves paralyze eye muscles and lock in bad vision. First of all, is my theory correct that the glasses themselves deteriorated my eyesight to the point of a vicious cycle of dependency?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
76 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Glasses and contact lenses are a nuisance to me. I am athletic and they get in the way. I have rejected LASIK eye surgery until now due to the risks. However, recently, I have been thinking more about it. It would be liberating not to have to depend on glasses or contacts anymore. I think it would make me more resilient physically, especially considering the tough times ahead, as well as protect me from the risk of not having my glasses on hand (they can break, too) or running out of contact lenses. I also get uncomfortable with glasses and contacts, and sometimes get headaches. They sure do get in the way of fun as well. And I spend a lot of time in front of the computer, and again, vision correction causes extra strain. I know several people that have done the surgery and they report no problems years after. But there are also lots of warnings about risks, such as blurry vision and regression after some time. Overall, I know the divine realm is not in favor of surgery. Considering that we need to be in top form with minimal obstacles to effectiveness for the mission, and considering that I am also supported by the protocols to mitigate risks, would it be best for me to do this procedure? Or are there serious risks that could become a net negative and is it best to continue relying on glasses/contact lenses?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “According to ChatGPT, risks of topical chelation are minimal with small areas and short use but could lower calcium or magnesium if used extensively (EDTA binds calcium, magnesium, zinc, and iron, potentially lowering levels) and that rare but serious complications include mineral depletion, hypotension, fatigue, or strain on kidneys or liver. Would using low concentrations (1–5%), avoiding chelation if there are kidney, liver, or metabolic issues and limiting duration and frequency (e.g., once daily, 5–7 days per cycle), and limiting the treated area to a small area of the body (≤20–25% of surface), while taking a daily multivitamin/multimineral supplement be a sound safety protocol?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has previously suggested topical chelation as an effective treatment for improving coronary vessel blood flow, especially in combination with Lumbrokinase and Venoplus8. Chelactiv EDTA Cream from Chelactiv, Inc however is not available in the UK. Would the UK products KelaCream EDTA Heavy Metal Detox Cream (delivers Calcium Disodium EDTA into the body transdermally.) and Detoxacream be safe and effective in reducing arterial calcified plaque, given that EDTA can be irritating to veins, cause blood pressure drops, damage kidneys and removes essential minerals from the body, including calcium?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
Is taking a wide spectrum mineral supplement essential if using topical chelation therapy?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
45 views0 answers0 votes
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is widely used in respiratory medicine, with a maximum licensed dose in chronic use of 600 mg/day, although use of up to 3,000 mg/day has been reported to be safe. The supplement studies combining Glycine with NAC (GlyNAC) have used doses of 100 mg/kg/day of each supplement. Thus, a 150-pound person (68 kg) would be taking about 6,800 mg of Glycine and 6,800 mg of NAC. Are these doses safe to recommend for daily intake, as long-term safety has not been established yet at these levels of exposure?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
To help probe the issue of viral involvement in cancer, a study was reported in 2018 of a library of gene sequence data on file for a repository of normal and malignant human tissue samples from 3,052 participants across 22 different cancer types. Results showed that five viral families are prevalent in human cancer. These include the Papillomaviridae, Polyomoviridae, Hepadnaviridae, Flaviviridae, and Herpesviridae. Viruses were detected in 7.5 – 98.8% of patients of seven cancers: bladder carcinoma, cervical squamous cell carcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, liver hepatocellular carcinoma, rectum adenocarcinoma, and stomach adenocarcinoma. [Cantalupo PG, Katz JP, Pipas JM. Viral sequences in human cancer. Virology. 2018 Jan 1;513:208-216.] Having found that viral sequences were present in most of the files they analyzed from human tumor databases, the authors pointed out there are two possible explanations: first, a given virus may be present in human tissue because it infects humans, perhaps even contributing to tumorigenesis; and second, the viral detection may be due to an artifact. This seems to ignore additional uncertainties. Such studies showing evidence of a viral presence assume it to be an aggravating factor, a “driver” of malignancy and not necessarily a cause. However, if a low-level, smoldering, virus causes malignant transformation, once that is triggered, it need not continue growing in order for tumors to form and spread, so a low number of virus particles might end up being deadly but disregarded as having an important role if only present in low numbers or below level of detection. Also, there is the limitation that only known viral sequences were searched for, so no novel viruses could even be discovered by this survey. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
Does the methylsulfonylmethane in the Horbaach supplement containing a blend of hyaluronic acid and MSM do anything beneficial for vision, so as to be an asset in that choice of low-cost hyaluronic acid supplements?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Enfinity Paraxanthine is a downstream metabolite of caffeine that is claimed to offer jitter-free energy, have minimal impact on sleep, not overstimulate cognition, and promote a steady, uplifting mood. Does Creator’s previous comments on caffeine also apply to Enfinity Paraxanthine? Does the production process for Enfinity Paraxanthine introduce unsafe contaminants or byproducts that make it less safe than a natural source of caffeine? I was hoping to find a supplement that can reliably serve as an emergency energy booster when called for without impacting sleep quality, but I’m curious about the longer-term safety of a processed caffeine alternative like paraxanthine.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Kuafly supplement containing 50 mg Lutein, 30 mg Astaxanthin, 30 mg Zeaxanthin, 30 mg Saffron, 30 mg Ashwagandha, 50 mg Palmitoylethanolamide along with anthocyanins, vitamins A, C, and E and 8 mg CoQ10, a safe and high-quality source of these nutraceuticals for eye health? Would there be adequate bioavailability as there does not seem to be an adjunct for absorption like BioPerine?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
107 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank the Kuafly supplement among the Advanced Vision Formula, OcuXanthin, NutraVision, Vision Essentials Ultra, and AREDS2 for helping vision problems like macular degeneration and cataracts?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
Is the recipe for topical EDTA chelation cream by Dr. Robert Cassar obtainable through the Earther Academy an economical, safe, and effective approach to use? How does it rank in effectiveness compared to the Chelactiv EDTA Cream we have asked you about previously?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
Of the five supplements for helping vision, to economize is it sufficient in most cases to use the top two supplements, Advanced Vision Formula and OcuXanthin, or can it be very important to have the top three by including Nutra Vision?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
Can the OcuXanthin be dropped as three of its ingredients are already in the top-ranked supplement, and inexpensive hyaluronic acid can replace its single unique ingredient?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
123…11Next »
Ask Question