DWQA Questions › Tag: policymakers
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reportedly plans to acknowledge an acetaminophen-autism link, sending Tylenol maker Kenvue’s stock plummeting. Is scientist William Parker’s hypothesis correct, that acetaminophen (Tylenol) causes autism in some children? If so, is that solely or partly because its neurotoxicity aggravates the neurologic injury from mercury injection done by the Extraterrestrial Alliance?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
13 views0 answers0 votes
A recent study showed that nine pharmaceuticals commonly used in residential aged care significantly enhanced bacterial resistance to antibiotics, adding to the growing worldwide problem of declining antibiotic effectiveness, and the attendant morbidity and mortality. These included Advil, Tylenol, diclofenac (an anti-inflammatory to treat arthritis), furosemide (for high blood pressure), metformin (for high sugar levels linked to diabetes), atorvastatin (to help lower cholesterol and fats in the blood), tramadol (a stronger pain medication post-surgery), temazepam (used to treat sleeping problems), and pseudoephedrine (a decongestant). Are these or other drugs also causing lowered immune defenses against chronic viruses, which you have confirmed are the cause of 85% of chronic diseases? Hanbiao Chen, Sylvia A. Sapula, John Turnidge, Henrietta Venter. The effect of commonly used non-antibiotic medications on antimicrobial resistance development in Escherichia coli. npj Antimicrobials and Resistance, 2025; 3 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s44259-025-00144-w.
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
Was the research, including the clinical data, for the paper we asked you about, “Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against development of chronic pain,” valid and not corrupted by the interlopers to malign seemingly useful common painkillers? Given your warnings that clinical research cannot always be trusted, we just want to be sure. What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
9 views0 answers0 votes
The phenomena seem quite striking which are reported in the paper, “Acute inflammatory response via neutrophil activation protects against development of chronic pain,” by Marc Parisien et al. Sci Transl Med. 2022 May 11; 14(644). These authors showed in animal models that painkillers like corticosteroids and NSAIDs, but not analgesics like morphine or lidocaine which lack anti-inflammatory effects, end up prolonging pain, because without neutrophil activation being allowed to happen as part of an immune response, acute pain may become chronic. A clinical study confirmed that among patients whose lower back pain had become chronic, it was exclusively those who had been treated with NSAIDS who went on to develop neuropathy. Was this a valid study with broad implications about the unexpected downside of anti-inflammatory medication for moderating pain? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
I shudder when I consider I spent years striving to develop inhibitors of neutrophil activation as therapeutics for autoimmune disease. Was that not only misguided, but a sinister consequence of interloper manipulation to encourage the field of immunopharmacology, knowing it could make things worse? What can Creator tell us about the medical implications for using anti-inflammatories?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
12 views0 answers0 votes
Acetaminophen (paracetamol) also marketed as Tylenol, is one of the most widely-used drugs by pregnant women and children and studies have mounted showing a link between prenatal or early childhood exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders, like autism, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), language delays, behavioral problems, and lower IQ. Are those studies accurate and valid, or has there been interloper interference to create another cover story to mask their deliberate toxic manipulations of the brains of infants?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
There is a description circulating on the Internet claiming that the polio epidemic was misinformation based on assuming the polio virus was causing paralysis when it was actually a dangerous upsurge in spraying DDT indiscriminately, which is neurotoxic. What is the divine truth here?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
332 views0 answers0 votes
A number of research studies have been called into question because of poor reproducibility when an attempt to replicate their findings failed. A “replication crisis” has been noted for psychology, sociology, education, economics, and medical research. For example, a detailed inquiry was mounted to replicate 193 experiments from 53 top cancer papers published from 2010-2012. Only a quarter of the original findings were able to be reproduced. Moreover, even for effects that were reproduced, the magnitude averaged 85% less than observed in the original investigations. This is concerning because such experiments are crucial for deciding what to pursue for drug development and when to proceed to clinical trials. Unreliable results not only waste money but expose patients to unnecessary risks. While there are many understandable reasons why results can vary, what can Creator tell us about hidden reasons for such poor reproducibility and their impact on the reliability of scientific inquiry?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
232 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a trial to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to reduce their risk for heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease. The trial, called Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, or ACCORD, involved over 10,000 Type 2 diabetic patients who had either been previously diagnosed with heart disease or had two or more risk factors for heart disease when they entered the study. Half received standard treatment and half were treated aggressively with higher doses of antidiabetic drugs. The trial was halted 18 months early because of a 26% increase in deaths in the aggressively treated group. The NIH said there was no conclusive link to a particular medication. Were these outcomes just a fluke or was over-medication involved? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
193 views0 answers0 votes
The diabetes drug rosiglitazone, sold under the trade name Avandia, has come under scrutiny. From 1999 to 2009, nearly 50,000 people on Avandia suffered heart attack, stroke, heart failure or death. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended in September 2010 that the drug be suspended because the benefits no longer outweighed the risks.[10][11] It was withdrawn from the market in the UK, Spain and India in 2010,[12] and in New Zealand and South Africa in 2011. It is still being prescribed in the U.S. following a review of safety data by the FDA. Is this drug safe to use or are there cardiovascular risks? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
187 views0 answers0 votes
Are clinical studies in less prominent foreign scientific journals more likely to be reliable than what is reported in major U.S. journals, due to less interloper interference with the studies or their interpretation?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
214 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “For the Ancient Greeks, knowledge was about understanding the essence of things through reason. Knowledge was secular and concerned with the physical world. The universe was studied as a mechanical system that could be understood through observation and logic. By contrast, in the much older Vedic (Hindu) mathematics, the goal was about maintaining cosmic order, aligning rituals with universal principles, and achieving spiritual goals. The ultimate purpose of knowledge and mathematics was to realize one’s unity with the universal consciousness (Brahman). Knowledge was a tool for spiritual awakening. Was the Hindu system corrupted to re-focus Greek culture towards a more limited worldview?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
166 views0 answers0 votes
The trial to assess chelation therapy 2 (TACT2) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes and a prior myocardial infarction (MI) was reported in September, 2024. While there was a significant reduction in circulating heavy metals following months of weekly intravenous EDTA infusions, there was not a significant reduction in cardiovascular events or mortality. You told us previously that EDTA therapy was actually beneficial, as the first TACT study showed, but that the interlopers were suppressing beneficial clinical data. Is that the reason for the failed confirmation with the TACT2 follow-up?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
12Next »
Ask Question