DWQA Questions › Tag: Advanced Mitochondrial Formula
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A viewer asks: “I loved the last Divine Life Support webinar and see how important the Mitochondrial aspect is. Since you’ve already compared various products, could you please ask Creator how does L’Evate You compare and rank to those in Creator’s list?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
33 views0 answers0 votes
I am trying to figure out which ingredients in Mito-Essence are most important to add and in what amounts using bulk supplements, if people are taking both Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27 as a foundation, as you have said taking all three would be beneficial. The two foundational supplements have about 216 mg Niacinamide. Would adding another 250 mg be safe and advantageous?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
The two foundational supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27, have about 190 mg Acetyl-L-Carnitine. Would adding another 1000 mg be safe and advantageous?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
The two foundational supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula and Metaphenol-27, have about 216 mg Niacinamide. Would adding another 250 mg be safe and advantageous?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
15 views0 answers0 votes
The Mito-Essence has quite large amounts of Thiamine (vitamin B-1) 250 mg, about 200-fold the recommended daily allowance, and Riboflavin (vitamin B-2) 100 mg, about 80-fold the recommended daily allowance. Are these high doses safe and beneficial?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
14 views0 answers0 votes
The Mito-Essence has 10 mg of Luteolin. The latter is sold as a supplement by Longlifenutri in 100mg capsules. Would using this higher dose of this ingredient be safe and beneficial?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
13 views0 answers0 votes
Mito-Essence, a supplement from Primal Force (Dr. Al Sears) contains Thiamine (as benofotiamine) 250 mg, Niacin (as niacinamide) 250 mg, Riboflavin (Vitamin B-2) 100 mg, Acetyl-L-Carnitine 1,000 mg, N-Acetyl Cysteine, 500 mg, Rhodiola Rosea 250 mg, and Luteolin 10 mg. It is promoted as a mitochondrial protectant and enhancer. How does it compare in effectiveness compared to Advanced Mitochondrial Formula from Advanced Bionutritionals?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
Would adding Mito-Essence to our Antiviral Regimen be more beneficial than adding Metaphenol-27?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
19 views0 answers0 votes
Would using all three supplements, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula, Metaphenol 27, and Mito-Essence, although expensive, be worthwhile for benefiting health and longevity significantly?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
One of the reasons an atheist might cite for why they don’t believe in God, or at the very least a “loving God,” is the huge number of noxious species of microbial, plant, and animal life on this planet. There are so many that it is practically impossible to catalog them all, and new ones are being discovered on literally a DAILY basis. Scientists estimate the average somewhere between 40-55 new species are discovered each day. Certainly, a percentage of those could be labeled “noxious,” in that they are harmful to humans in some way, either directly or indirectly, through attacking another plant or animal species that is beneficial to humans. Of the 40-55 new species discovered each day, what rough percentage are truly NEW-to-Earth species that have been introduced just in the last decade? How big is this problem, and how long has it been going on? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
175 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about the American Chestnut Tree: “By the 1940s the blight had killed an estimated four billion American chestnut trees nationwide. Where before about a third of all trees in the Smoky Mountains were chestnuts, today even single spindly saplings are rare.” The chestnut blight fungus was supposedly introduced from Asia accidently. To give people an idea of just how tragic this massive loss was, here is a brief description found on forestpathology.org of the value of the chestnut tree: “If you could custom design the ideal tree species, you couldn’t come up with a better one than American chestnut. It was a huge, majestic tree, with a very straight stem. The wood was nearly ideal. As George Hepting has written, ‘Not only was baby’s crib likely made of chestnut, but chances were, so was the old man’s coffin.’ One of its good qualities was high durability. The heartwood could be used in situations where decay was a hazard. The tree was common. It made up about 50% of most eastern hardwood forests. It grew fast and would regenerate itself by root sprouts vigorously. The nuts were edible, not only by wildlife but also by humans. It was an important food source for all. ‘The farmer’s hogs were fattened on chestnuts, and, to no small degree, his children were also.’ Chestnut was also prized as a landscape tree.” If indeed the blight did come from Asia, how long had it been in Asia, and what was its true origin? What can Creator tell us about the tragic loss of the American Chestnut?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
150 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about Zebra Mussels: “Zebra mussels are small, freshwater, bivalve shellfish that were likely brought to the U.S. as stowaways in the ballast water of ships. They are native to the Caspian and Black Seas south of Russia and Ukraine, and have since become widespread in both Europe and the U.S.” The zebra mussel is a problem because it is so prolific. Each female can release up to a million eggs a year. “Biofouling is [an ecological problem] … Zebra mussels will attach to native mussels much like they do docks, boats, and water and power plant intake pipes, and in large enough numbers can prevent the natives from moving, feeding, reproducing, or regulating water properly. The zebra mussels also outcompete the natives for food and space, and because of their fast reproduction can quickly overwhelm a water system. The feeding habits of zebra mussels can also have a drastic impact on an infested lake. Zebra mussels are filter feeders that siphon particles of plankton from the water. They are highly efficient at this, and a large population of mussels can quickly clear the water of almost all floating particles. This change can cause shifts in local food webs, both by robbing food from native species that feed on plankton and also by increasing water clarity and thus making it easier for visual predators to hunt.” The costs to control and clean up zebra mussel infestations is enormous. And the problem never goes away, it can only be managed. This species is so good at causing problems, it couldn’t have been a truly native creature in the Black Sea either. It seems tailor-made for another WORLD and doesn’t belong here at ALL. What is Creator’s perspective, and what kind of environment is a good fit for this creature?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
There have been reports of egg prices soon going as high as twenty dollars a dozen in some locations. This is presumably due to a bird flu epidemic and a government policy of killing entire flocks of egg-laying hens, some numbering in the millions of birds. What is the true origin of bird flu, and is this drastic approach to its management and prevention called for in any way that could be considered rational? What is actually the bigger cause of the egg shortage, the invasive bird flu virus, or possible mind control manipulation surrounding its management? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
182 views0 answers0 votes
Whether a species is invasive or not might depend on a number of factors. The European hare is considered a native species of Europe and a valuable one at that. But the same species imported into Australia has been disastrous. Google has this to say about the problem: “Rabbits are a serious environmental and agricultural pest in Australia. They were introduced for sport hunting in the late 18th century, but their rapid reproduction rate led to millions of rabbits. Rabbits cost the Australian economy over $200 million per year. They compete with livestock for food, damage crops, and destabilize the land. Rabbits overgraze, which can lead to soil erosion, the collapse of indigenous plants, and the decline of native animals. They may have also caused the extinction of several small ground dwelling mammals. Rabbits threaten the survival of more than 300 Australian native species, including 24 critically endangered species.” Are these rabbits truly native to Earth, or are they an interloper-introduced invasive species? If native, then is this a wholly human-created problem, or were the humans who brought them to Australia for “sport” influenced to do that by the interlopers? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
169 views0 answers0 votes
It seems with the advent of modern civilization, global media, and global travel, that the opportunity for the interlopers to introduce large land-based mammalian and reptilian creatures, like lions and crocodiles, has effectively expired. Such an introduction today would draw too much attention and be too much of an anomaly. Not so with anything aquatic or small, as in small insects and even birds. Same with any kind of plant life. So while we’re not being overrun globally with new mammoths and saber-toothed tigers, we are being overrun with almost every other kind of invasive species. Creator has previously commented on the “Beast of Gévaudan,” a very large and very vicious species of wolf. Was this the last time the interlopers tried to seriously introduce such a creature, and did they conclude that the opportunity to do this further had passed? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
123…8Next »
Ask Question