DWQA Questions › Tag: AI
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
An editorial in Scientific American stated: “As we become more reliant on AI for our jobs, what will happen to our skills? Early studies suggest that professional abilities can quickly erode as AI is integrated into workplaces. So-called de-skilling is a growing concern for medical specialists, computer scientists and other workers. Seventy percent of nurses and 77 percent of physicians, for example, are worried about losing their skills because of over-reliance on AI systems, according to a June survey of U.S. health care workers.” Two examples: The first example of over-reliance on AI systems was discussed in the medical field where scientists performed a study of physicians in Poland who specialize in endoscopy. Doctors who had each performed at least 2,000 colonoscopies during their career were given access to an AI system that analyzes colonoscopy images in real-time and flags pre-cancerous lesions. During the three-month period before the AI tool was introduced, the specialists found at least one adenoma during 28.4 percent of colonoscopies. During the three-month period after the tool was introduced, the adenoma detection rate for colonoscopies performed without AI assistance decreased to 22.4 percent.
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
A second example of over-reliance on AI systems was discussed in the computer science field where the AI company Anthropic designed a randomized controlled trial in which 52 software engineers were asked to perform a basic coding task. During the exercise, all 52 participants could search the web and access instructions on how to do the task. Half of the participants were prompted to use an AI assistant as well. After the task, participants were quizzed on the task they had just completed. The AI-assisted participants did significantly worse on the quiz than those who hadn’t used AI: the average score was 50 percent in the AI group versus 67 percent in the non-AI group.
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
29 views0 answers0 votes
What the experts say: “To prevent AI-driven skill erosion, people need to be aware of how much they are offloading to generative AI tools,” says Tapani Rinta-Kahila, an information-systems researcher at the Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki. “People need to manage the competing dynamics of relying on generative AI and staying mindfully vigilant.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A July 2026 article in a neuroscience website reporting on several large studies suggests that average Intelligence Quotient (IQ, standardized tests built to measure specific cognitive skills) scores among younger cohorts have flattened or slightly declined after nearly a century of steady gains. They say multiple national datasets show IQ score gains slowing or reversing in cohorts born after the 1990s, following roughly a century of steady increases. Is this mainly due to heavy reliance on search engines and constant online connectivity reshaping how the brain allocates attention and stores information? Is this a major threat to human thinking ability or a short-term moral panic?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Research from MIT in June 2025, “Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task,” by Nataliya Kosmyna et al., examined the effects of using ChatGPT to write essays. Using electroencephalograms (EEGs), they recorded each participant’s brain activity. ChatGPT users had the lowest brain engagement and “consistently underperformed at neural, linguistic, and behavioral levels.” They also retained less information from the essays that were written. It seems that reliance on AI systems impairs cognitive processes underlying independent thinking (People who didn’t use ChatGPT had higher engagement and performed better). Does reliance upon large language models (LLMs) jeopardize long-term brain development by altering the brain’s neural networks?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
Things seem to be worsening politically and economically at the moment. Is this a prelude to the power outages starting, or will the delay continue to further support AI growth?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
34 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Some Mercenary Army Program (MAP) fighters report on the possibility of transferring their consciousness into a clone body. The (so-called) advantage being that if the clone body is then killed in action, the consciousness will automatically transfer back to the original human body, enabling the fighter to go on to fight another day. Is this true, and if so, can consciousness be subdivided in order to simultaneously run several clone bodies?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
32 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Clones, whether ET-made or human-made, need animation. This cannot be life force energy as this only comes from Creator, so what force powers the DNA-based cloned humans? Is it the same type of energy that is used to power Grey soulless DNA-based robotic beings? If so, what is it? How is it produced or bestowed upon the clone? Is it uniquely produced via physiological activities such as eating which, in turn, might explain the robotic behavior noticeable in human clones?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have become concerned over how excessive information being streamed/broadcast/shared is fogging my sense of being human. One author that clarifies this concern is Neil Postman and his book, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. He defines “Technopoly” as a society that deifies technology, surrendering its culture, traditions, and human values to the authority of technology. He suggests that resisting this takeover requires a conscious effort to preserve and value non-technological sources of meaning: religion, art, philosophy, tradition etc. Is his analysis and remedy correct? How essential is it to disconnect from the “technoculture” of interconnected devices?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
Recent studies of creative writing confirm use of Artificial Intelligence leads to sameness, not innovation, as in the work of K. Moon, et al., “Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diversity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing.” [Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans 6 (2025) 100207]. A previous study of 370,000 personal statements from college applicants also showed that those essays prepared with ChatGPT used more diverse and colorful language, but lacked truly creative ideas. The data revealed a two to eightfold greater number of creative ideas when humans worked alone than when working with AI. Is that an accurate analysis? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
Scientific American reported a mathematical advance done through Artificial Intelligence: “After 80 years of struggle by human mathematicians with nothing to show, a chatbot has solved a major geometry conjecture, called the “unit distance” problem. The company OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, announced the result yesterday, together with comments from a number of experts, who declared the artificial intelligence’s method “clever” and “elegant.” Chatbots have made some achievements in math in recent months, but this marks a true milestone that would warrant being published in a mathematics journal if humans had achieved it.” Was there any surreptitious assistance given by extraterrestrial AI systems to help the human platform achieve this?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
You have said to us many times that the interlopers are carrying out a Trojan Horse maneuver to deceive us in representing themselves as benevolent white-hat ETs who are here to help save us from the black-hat variety who have infiltrated our world. Is the current rollout and escalation of the mad dash to create ever-more-powerful AI systems, in effect, a Trojan Horse bringing a kind of false-hope with alien encouragement that will ultimately backfire, causing damage and economic losses from within our own infrastructure?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
92 views0 answers0 votes
Recent channeling to probe a client’s business plans, which rely heavily on Artificial Intelligence support and implementation, were pessimistic about things working out. Was this an objective assessment?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
60 views0 answers0 votes
The concerns raised about vulnerability of internal Artificial Intelligence systems to being breached and corrupted, even the surreptitious creation of a back door allowing unfettered interloper access, would seem to predict likelihood of things going wrong, inevitably, and quite possibly to a catastrophic degree. Is this going to be seen almost universally across industries that have embraced and depend on AI for their infrastructure? Is that the plan? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Will this systemic failure of company Artificial Intelligence platforms even be coordinated to happen all at once to generate a crippling chaos?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
123…14Next »
Ask Question