DWQA Questions › Tag: ancient godsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesThere is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Problems in Society222 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Problems in Society134 views0 answers0 votesPropaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Problems in Society247 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Problems in Society151 views0 answers0 votesThe authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Problems in Society150 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control279 views0 answers0 votesPrior to the recent agreement to withdraw after the Disclosure Event and take a break from their endless manipulations of our planet and everything on it, has it been a kind of free-for-all, where many individuals can come and take a turn, perhaps competing amongst their brethren to see who can be most clever, most destructive, most innovative, and so on? Or is there an agreed on main agenda where all must follow an approved set of guidelines and goals? There have been at least a couple major motion pictures having a futuristic theme where people can use an advanced technology to journey to an artificial world and adopt a persona to have lifelike experiences for fun and relaxation, or challenge and excitement. One was Westworld, depicting people going back to the old West to take on gunslingers, and more recently, the movie Total Recall, where people could pay to have a vacation in their mind that was totally lifelike. Both movies showed a dark side in having an unexpected blending with reality. This was also a theme used many times in the Star Trek franchise, in having spaceships with a Holodeck that future explorers could visit during long voyages as a lifelike experiencing of other worlds and plotlines for fun and learning opportunities. Are these a kind of inversion of what the extraterrestrials do in visiting our world, coming to participate as observers who can manipulate us, in reality, to act out their fantasies and darkest thoughts for amusement and gratification, but without taking any risk themselves?ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers435 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers378 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers331 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Is Enlil in fact the being known as YAHWEH or is that name just an epithet for Source Creator?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Imposters694 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “If neither is the case, who is YAHWEH?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Imposters718 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Is YESHUA somehow associated with the being known as Enki?” What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Imposters634 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Analytical psychotherapist Carl Jung believed in inherited unconscious knowledge and experiences across generations, expressed through universal symbols and archetypes such as gods like Mars (god of war), Venus (goddess of love), Prometheus (rebelliousness) and so on. Earlier civilizations such as the Roman Empire took the existence of such gods literally and assumed they were responsible for day-to-day events. How should we now understand this idea? Are gods in fact dynamic psychic energies that have an existence that can be personified and communicated with, to better understand, for example, diseases and illness? In what ways is this a useable idea in modern times?”ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Non-Local Consciousness354 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “If extraterrestrials do not believe in God, why are they afraid of those who pray and try to heal others? Why do they do anything to prevent humans from believing in God and from, in fact, raising their vibration? Is there some fear for them that humans may be more powerful when they pray in groups?”ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers485 views0 answers0 votesThe Cliff Palace of Mesa Verde, in the Four Corners Region of the United States, is one of the most mysterious structures in the world. Built by the Anasazi native peoples, it appears to be built solely for protection from some grave external threat. Can Creator tell us approximately when it was built? Why was it built? Who built it? Was it wholly of human conception, design, and construction? How long did it take to build? Did it succeed or fail in its purpose, and why?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers476 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola