DWQA Questions › Tag: antiviral supplements
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to net all pathogens with white light to reduce their ability to trigger the immune system to fight back, causing ‘the collateral damage of many, many chronic illnesses and their symptoms,’ as described in the Divine Wisdom Database entry? Should/could the effects of viruses on the immune system be attenuated in a similar fashion to how dark spirit meddlers are addressed in the LHP? On page 5, ‘Have All Spirits, Pathogens, and Intruders Netted with a white Light (for any new arrivals),’ and on page 10, ‘Net all spirits, pathogens, and other intrusive energies within and around my clients following this session and hold them safely in place until they are removed by repeated protocol work.'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “This question is asked in reference to Karl’s previous channeling of Source Creator on 10-28-25. [A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective? “This can be requested to happen—the application of the benefits of antiviral supplements be transferred to everyone, everywhere, across all timelines—but this will not be uniformly effective because each individual situation, time, place, circumstance, and the people involved will have an energetic matrix that will govern the energetics of what is allowable with respect to divine intervention and all of the variables, such as levels of belief in the divine, belief in the self, and the inner barriers to change from corrupted beliefs about one’s physical makeup and circumstances. People believe in their illnesses and this is a barrier to divine healing. So this is a highly variable and uncertain undertaking but it can be requested for more to be done.” The above channeling, describing barriers to divine intervention for implementation of antiviral supplement benefits across timelines, seems unsurprising. The same restrictions apply quite variably, to potentially every request in both the LHP and DSMR protocols. Divine intervention is always uncertain as to the degree and effectiveness allowable, depending on individual circumstances and energies. Is there a workaround we are unaware of that would help this sharing of antiviral healing and protection be more uniformly potent? Knowing these barriers exist, can we simply request they be transmuted into welcoming and amplifying positive energies?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 days ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “In a recent channeling Creator has said that the divine can’t take viruses directly out of us because that would essentially amount to killing them, but that we can use physical measures such as antiviral supplements to get rid of viruses ourselves without accumulating karma from doing so. On the other hand, we have been told and know that Creator regularly removes viruses from food or beverages to be ingested if we use the daily prayers. I would like to understand why it seems to be possible for you to remove viruses from our food directly but not from our bodies? Isn’t it essentially the same as killing the viruses when removed from our food? What’s the difference? Is it because, in the case of food, the viruses haven’t come into contact with the consciousness of a host body yet and can therefore be removed more easily? Is it because they can be removed from food without killing them or something else entirely?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
116 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “It was a bit disappointing to find out that remote healing via the LHP seems to be rather limited when it comes to removing viruses directly. Creator has stated that more than 85% of all chronic illnesses are viral in origin, so that seems to be quite a limitation for what remote healing is able to achieve if one of the main culprits that is responsible for most illnesses seems to be off-limits, at least in a direct and immediate sense. The fact that we can take measures into our own hands and use antiviral supplements or other physical methods to free ourselves from these viruses is all well and good but there are still massive limits in place that will hinder our progress. What about our other lives, for example?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
101 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “So we may have been lucky enough to find out the truth about viruses and what to do against them in this life, thanks to Karl’s brilliant work, but what good is it if it comes to our many other lives where we don’t possess this knowledge, let alone the means to do anything about it? To me this seems like a rather big hole in the healing equation that needs to be addressed somehow. Is there any kind of “loophole” by which we could achieve more in this regard?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
74 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Could we, for example, ask via the LHP that whenever we take an antiviral supplement, for all the benefits it brings to be automatically applied to our other lives as well? Could we, by doing so, authorize the divine to do more for us through this and help to remove viruses more aggressively? Could we perhaps even ask for the same benefits to be applied to all other humans or beings in general whenever we take an antiviral supplement ourselves or apply another physical method that allows for more direct removal of viruses from our bodies? Or is there perhaps another method by which this could be achieved?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
I found a single published case report of someone with recurrent periodontal disease who was studied and found to have a high Epstein-Barr viral load subgingivally. Antiviral treatment with Valtrex for a period of 10 days reduced the virus to the detection limit and the periodontal disease improved dramatically. The condition was stable when checked a year later and the virus was still barely detectable. [PT Sunde, et al. Patient with severe periodontitis and subgingival Epstein-Barr virus treated with antiviral therapy. J Clin Virol 2008 Jun;42(2):176-8.] Viral screening is not done routinely for patients with chronic gingivitis. Was this a meaningful example of what could be achieved readily with a shift in thinking by periodontists to try an antiviral in patients, especially those with severe chronic gum disease?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
As has been conjectured by researchers that pathogenic bacteria from chronic gum disease might find their way to the brain and influence or cause dementia, could chronic viruses from inflamed gums seed virus to cause sites of infection not only in brain, but in other organs and tissues, like the cardiovascular system, kidney, liver, pancreas, thyroid, etc?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
You told us in a channeling that in about 80% of periodontal disease cases, the chronic gingivitis is actually caused by a virus, and a search of the literature turned up some scientific support of viral involvement in that disorder. A paper by M. Kazi, et al. (J. Clin. Diag. Res., 2015 Jul, Vol-9(7): DC05-DC08) describes that among 75 patients with periodontitis, 81.33% as a group had detectable HSV-1, HSV-2, Epstein-Barr virus, or cytomegalovirus. Although scientifically, this is only showing an association of virus presence, is this actually reflecting true causation of the illness for those patients?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Black, loose tea can be purchased in a variety of leaf size. The larger they are, the more nuanced taste. The smaller they are and more dust-like, the more tannic, brisk, and strong in taste during the oxidation process. As black tea is part of the Divine’s supplements list, which is the best? I prefer the taste of larger leaves, but is this not enough to be of health benefit? Does it have to be of the strong taste variety?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
133 views0 answers0 votes
What percent of migraine headaches are caused by chronic viruses present in the body?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
To help integrate the supplements in the Antiviral Regimen to also take into account their direct anticancer rankings, is it fair to say that if taking all of them is not affordable, that taking these six: Cannabitol 5000, Chaga, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula, Kiva Black Seed Oil, Metaphenol 27, and Cho-Wa, in that order, would include the top 5 antivirals and the top 5 having direct anticancer effects on malignant cells or tumor growth?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
110 views0 answers0 votes
Is Cho-Wa weighted more heavily, like the Advanced Mitochondrial Formula, because it has anticancer effects on tumors not caused by viruses, as well as those that are caused by chronic viruses?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
212 views0 answers0 votes
Is this a good rank order [Cannabitol 5000, Chaga, Advanced Mitochondrial Formula, Kiva Black Seed Oil, Metaphenol 27, and Cho-Wa] in considering both antiviral and direct anticancer effects, or would you modify it in some way?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
Is fatty infiltration of the pancreas actually a consequence of a chronic viral infection, as is the case for fatty liver disease?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
123…11Next »
Ask Question