DWQA Questions › Tag: clinical studiesFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesIn reading how the belief took hold in society that fat in the diet is dangerous, even a cause of cancer, it seems to have been embraced by the government prior to there being solid evidence. The same is true for the belief salt is dangerous and a cause of hypertension. Were either or both of these dietary substances being promoted as dangerous, a disinformation campaign to actually cause trouble by restricting them in the diet when they are in fact essential for health?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control174 views0 answers0 votesThe Lancet just published a 96,000-patient registry analysis of multinational clinical data from hospitalized patients with COVID-19 comparing outcomes of four non-randomized treatment groups compared to controls: Chloroquine alone, chloroquine with a macrolide, hydroxychloroquine alone, or hydroxychloroquine with a macrolide. The main endpoints were in-hospital mortality and sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. There was no confirmed benefit of any treatment, and each of these drug regimens were associated with decreased in-hospital survival and an increased frequency of ventricular arrhythmias. Despite the fact this was not a careful randomized trial, it has been widely touted by the press, condemning the use of hydroxychloroquine as not only useless but dangerous for COVID-19 therapy. What is your interpretation of these data?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19224 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola