DWQA Questions › Tag: danger
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
66 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
72 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
59 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Would it be helpful to pray to you, Creator, to not only replace all self-limiting beliefs but to be open to and be inspired by beliefs that are positive, powerful, and the most helpful in fostering our highest alignment with Creator in the safest and quickest way for all levels of the mind? Or would this be an addition we could make to the LHP if we are interested in that for ourselves? How can we cultivate beliefs that are shaped and constructed by higher truth to serve us? What can Source Creator share with us regarding guiding the improvement of our beliefs?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
142 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, if we are subjected to self-limiting beliefs from interloper mind control, can you tell us if there are positive expanding beliefs we could suggest to ourselves to counter them? Beliefs like, “I am unlimited.” Could you give us an example or guide to picking them and how they could be implemented effectively?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
Why do spirit meddlers bother to attach to food or beverages in stores rather than just wait for food to be prepared and then attach while it is being served? That would seem to be much more of a sure thing for getting into a human being, as so much unsold food is discarded. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
284 views0 answers0 votes
Do spirit meddlers attach to wine and liquor bottles, or even bottled water, in order to reach and be ingested by unwary drinkers?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
204 views0 answers0 votes
Is the problem of spirit attachments in grocery items significant enough to warrant adding a specific request to the Lightworker Healing Protocol for them to be cleared?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
You confirmed a viewer’s suspicion he had picked up a spirit meddler attachment from eating sausages that were tainted energetically. Is this a common phenomenon akin to what you have described with marijuana, that spirit meddlers follow the harvested plants through the distribution chain, because they know when the user imbibes the drug, they will be able to penetrate the auric defenses and obtain a foothold within the energy of the victim? Can ingesting tainted food internalize dark spirits attached to it? Is this yet another reason to use our recommended meal prayer of protection?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
326 views0 answers0 votes
Recently, you told us: “GMO foods are, indeed, not only unnatural but a kind of menace because they inherently contain a dark intention that underlies the use of that technology to begin with. It is originating and being orchestrated by the Extraterrestrial Alliance, and that is the source of a large body of negative conscious influence right there.” Help us understand better the nature of that negative conscious influence. Is it some kind of technology, like an energy weapon or artificial consciousness, or simply negative thought forms?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
411 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “When I was under psychic attack I did relatively well until I made the mistake to buy some sausages from the grocery store that seemed to be tainted. After ingestion, my auric shielding was damaged. Through finger-strength testing I was able to get an answer. Not the nanotech, but some dark spirits attached to the food damaged my aura. And now I wonder whether the main purpose of GMO food is to weaken the auric shielding of humans so spirit meddlers have an easier time attaching. The cancer-causing effects of GMO seem to be just a secondary side effect.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
627 views0 answers0 votes
“Shame on you!” We’ve all heard it, and we’ve all said it. The Oxford Dictionary defines shame as both a feeling and an action, “a painful feeling of humiliation or distress caused by the consciousness of wrong or foolish behavior,” as well as, to “make (someone) feel ashamed.” Shame is a feeling nearly everyone everywhere tries to avoid, with the irony being that those most vulnerable to criticism are the ones most prone to overindulge in attempting to elicit that feeling in others. In some ways the dichotomy of shame is perhaps the most profound of hypocrisy litmus tests there is. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
445 views0 answers0 votes
Pavlov’s dog. If that term is unfamiliar to you, it is worth your time to get familiar with what it really means. Ivan Pavlov demonstrated a “conditioned response” in the dogs he used for experimentation. Some of these experiments were quite cruel and involved electric shocks to impair or elicit both involuntary physiological as well as behavioral responses. The act of shaming is actually a very similar paradigm, and it’s easy to imagine the one doing the shaming as having an electric shock button that they press to deliver a very uncomfortable at best, and excruciatingly painful at worst, emotional shock to the recipient’s consciousness. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
498 views0 answers0 votes
Shaming is not isolated to humans. An acquaintance has a five-year-old beagle who has an undesirable habit of urinating on the hardwood floor if not put outside on a timely basis. The dog has been trained entirely through rewards and only verbal shaming as punishment. But the effect of shaming can be quite profound. The dog knows that urinating inside the house is undesirable behavior and displeasing to the humans in the house, so the dog makes sure no one is watching when she goes. As an adult dog, she has never been caught in the act. One recent morning this acquaintance found the all too familiar puddle on the floor and turned to the dog right behind them, pointed to the puddle, and said, “No,” just, “No.” Not loud or even conveying much in the way of emotion, just enough to communicate displeasure. The response of the dog was rather extreme—tail between her legs and she wandered off to hide under the raised footrest of a recliner for a few minutes “until the coast was clear.” The acquaintance was a bit “taken aback” at the profound effect of a simple, “No.” This person does not shame the dog very often, and that may be one explanation for the exaggerated effect. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
477 views0 answers0 votes
The feeling of shame is associated with the “conscience” of a person. In fact, the very existence of this phenomenon is one of the most persuasive arguments there is for the existence of the divine. It’s hard to take the “conscience” for granted. Unfortunately, we have learned that the feeling of shame is a rather crude form of messaging that can be delivered from multiple sources, some benevolent and some malevolent. Presumably, it can come from the higher self, guides and guardians, and even Creator. It can also be triggered by the deep subconscious, cellular memory, spirit attachments, and perhaps most alarmingly of all, the interlopers—fallen angelics and extraterrestrials. Figuring out both the origin and relevancy of feelings of shame is one of the most profound challenges every human being faces. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
441 views0 answers0 votes
123…9Next »
Ask Question