DWQA Questions › Tag: divide and conquer
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Is there currently any intent by the interlopers to have the tidal power outages start before the end of the Yom Kippur period of vulnerability of the stock market?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
I’m feeling very down again with everything dragging on, with gold and the market continuing to rally. Any changes in the outlook?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
28 views0 answers0 votes
Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old from Utah, has been identified as the shooter who killed conservative spokesman and devout Christian, Charlie Kirk, during his debate with attendees at a recent college campus gathering. Robinson was persuaded by his father and a pastor to turn himself in. What caused him to become an assassin? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
18 views0 answers0 votes
Given your previous feedback that the triggering of the tidal power outages will likely be during this month of September, to coincide with a historical weak period of vulnerability for the stock market, the date of 9/11 is looming as a meaningful iconic anniversary. With the agenda of the interlopers as wanting to create a mystery, to ramp up fear and suspicion, using that date to launch their attack seems advantageous for their purposes. What can you tell us about the current status of their plans for the outages and their aftermath?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Through the NDE of Tyler Morrison, Creator verified the legitimacy of Jesus’s message of warning about Elon Musk’s Neuralink implants that will be rolled out and, through mind control, people will be jumping over each other to get one, and for those that don’t get them they’ll be blacklisted, have their power turned off, etc. This dream was in 2023. Is this still planned to move forward with this kind of “do or die” veracity? Jesus said this will specifically target the younger generations. Having two teenagers myself, I will add more intention in my prayers and LHP-DSMR sessions if this is deemed necessary.” What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
10 views0 answers0 votes
A recent national survey reports that half of American schools require ‘Equitable’ Grading and most teachers are opposed. The report identifies five equitable grading practices: unlimited test retakes, no late penalties, no zeroes, no homework, and no required participation. Critics cite examples of the policy enabling students to survive by going through the motions, but in the end losing out. Many school districts report a majority of students being as much as three years behind in basic proficiency. What is Creator’s perspective about American K-12 education and the reasons for chronic underperformance?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
8 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Prophetic channelings well before the November 2024 US presidential election had forecast massive power blackouts in the United States, followed by record crashes in both the stock market and fiat currency, a huge gold reset, and then Alien Disclosure as a Trojan horse gambit to gain human acceptance of the darkness running things, followed by ET withdrawal. There was also some thought of a drop in gold prices during the crash period I suppose, and many decided to sell their stakes in gold and hold cash in the meantime. I stuck with what Creator had been saying about gold for many years before that and it has paid well. Would you mind checking with Creator as to whether a drop in gold prices prior to these dramatic events is still likely and how steep that drop might be? Or would it be wiser to simply stay invested in gold and ride out any temporary slide? I know the Disclosure timeline is still expected anytime, but it seems that could be a very long time, and perhaps that would be in our best interests anyway.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
15 views0 answers0 votes
Are things on track for the tidal power outages to start soon?
ClosedNicola asked 1 day ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us that in today’s world, no human being can be trusted as an authority because of the corruption and mind control manipulation of our culture. Perhaps an example is the current controversy about a seemingly straightforward issue: whether or not crime in Washington D.C. needs urgent attention or has actually fallen. President Trump ordered 800 National Guard troops into the capitol, ostensibly to make the city safer, which is derided by the political left even though officials state that the police force is understaffed by 800 officers due to budget cuts. Meanwhile, a D.C. police commander was suspended a few months ago for allegedly under-reporting crime statistics. Others have pointed out that in Washington, and other sanctuary cities, defunding the police lowers crime statistics because lack of police action lets crime go unreported. Police are also under pressure to make things look good, and actually log serious crimes as minor ones, and many arrested criminals are simply let go as liberal prosecutors and judges will just dismiss the charges. What is the divine perspective? Is criminality a serious problem being aided and abetted by lax enforcement or is this Federal intervention just fearmongering and political posturing with a dangerous authoritarian motivation?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
113 views0 answers0 votes
In the book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want, co-authors Emily Bender and Alex Hanna argue that the term AI (acronym for Artificial Intelligence) is marketing hype. Google defines the word hype as “promote or publicize (a product or idea) intensively, often exaggerating its importance or benefits.” The implication is that without the exaggerated claim of benefit, and if people knew what they were REALLY getting with widespread adoption of these technologies bundled under the AI moniker, they quite likely would reject the product or idea altogether. The other pertinent question is, benefit to WHOM? Does the average consumer really benefit more than the cost imposed and the harm potentially incurred? The authors argue NO, the use of the term AI is really a bait and switch for increased AUTOMATION across the board. Automation that will decrease the demand for labor and remove human judgment from decision-making and categorizing. It will end up benefiting the ownership and finance classes at the expense of everyone else. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
The term AI and Artificial Intelligence suddenly became relevant in the 2010s with the fortuitous adoption of chip technology designed to solve an entirely different problem, namely presenting complex and fast-changing graphics on computer screens, used mostly to make video games more realistic and lifelike. A little more than a decade ago, a small company named Nvidia made a graphics processor for making computer video a LOT faster. Today, it’s a trillion-dollar company because that processor was successfully adapted for AI processing with little modification. Once this discovery was made, untold TRILLIONS of dollars have been poured into making billions of these chips. Massive data centers are being built to utilize them, requiring vast amounts of resources and electricity. AI was less a software innovation than it was a hardware innovation. At the end of the day, these chips are overwhelmingly “number crunchers,” not much different in base functionality than an electronic calculator, only vastly miniaturized for speed and scaled up for volume. Is it fair to say that AI is really just a vast “calculator” when one tries to grasp how it REALLY works? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
204 views0 answers0 votes
When people think of AI, most think about chatbots like ChatGPT and Grok. These technologies are based on a software architecture called neural networks. Another name for the way these chatbots are put together is called LLMs or large language models. A large language model is really just a very sophisticated pattern matcher, and the shortcut used to match patterns is statistical probability. At its very foundation it makes large amounts (hundreds, thousands, millions or more) of microscopic decisions based on what statistically is more or less probable in terms of what comes before or after a word. Is it more probable the word “and” follows the word “this,” or more probable it follows the word “that?” So any response from a question to ChatGPT or Grok is the result of deep statistical analysis and pattern matching with no actual intelligence involved. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
143 views0 answers0 votes
An argument can be made that no single human being really understands how AI works. What they discovered when they added more processing power and more layers of pattern matching (what they call deep learning) for building large language models is that the chatbots became REMARKABLY humanlike in terms of their output. This was a downright shocking discovery, and this development alone suddenly diverted trillions of dollars of investment towards the development of AI. But according to the authors of the recent book, AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, Arvind Narayanan and Sayash Kapoor of Princeton University, relatively little of that money has been spent on research that would attempt to understand WHY we are getting this result. It seems no one really knows, and worse, no one REALLY CARES. Instead, the agenda is to throw more and faster hardware at it, “FEED THE BEAST” to give it more power, more capacity, more memory, with no one truly understanding why it even works as it does. Is this more human folly unfolding before our very eyes? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
Another technology that has mysterious origins is cryptocurrencies. To this day, no one really knows where Bitcoin originated, who created it, or who introduced it to the world. There is speculation all over the place, and it’s assumed someone knows, but that information is not public knowledge. Is Bitcoin a “gift” (more like a naked Trojan horse) from the interlopers? And is AI, and how it really works, similar in its origins? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
191 views0 answers0 votes
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
144 views0 answers0 votes
123…60Next »
Ask Question