DWQA Questions › Tag: divide and conquerFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesOne of the most maddening things for independent thinkers to put up with is the widespread tendency for people to first vet the source of recommended information before deciding whether they will even look at the new information or not. This can get downright comical when people will refuse to click on a link to a “questionable” website, that is in fact a link to a story on another site they actually approve of, or appears to support something they believe. Can Creator share why this seems like “enlightened” behavior to these people?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society481 views0 answers0 votesAirplane pilots need to know which way the wind is blowing before attempting a takeoff. To do this, they will lick their finger and stick it into the air. This same kind of “check,” to see which way the “right consensus” is thinking, is observed almost everywhere. Another analogy would be to think of people walking around with a mini satellite dish on their head, that is connected 24-7 to their consensus database, like social media or a particular news outlet, so they’re never confused about what is “safe” information and what is “dangerous” information? What is Creator’s perspective of these analogies?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society658 views0 answers0 votesIt has been observed that many people genuinely fear information that has been deemed by their consensus to be dangerous, to the extent that they risk exile and banishment (or worse) if they even reveal that they know something they shouldn’t. Not unlike discovering that the car you’re driving is a stolen one, or that you are a carrier of a deadly virus. But the dilemma is, once you are exposed to information, it is very difficult to unsee it, and so people go to great lengths to avoid being exposed if they can help it. This creates some remarkable “gymnastics” at times. Can Creator comment?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society612 views0 answers0 votesPlacing one’s full allegiance with a consensus, and making consensus approval their top criterion for conducting their lives means that consensus acceptance can be more important than facts or truth—to the extreme extent of people not believing their own eyes, or ignoring fundamental standards of fairness and decency they learned at age five. Can Creator share the karmic hazards of living this way?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society641 views0 answers0 votesIt would seem that one of the core operating principles of effective mind control manipulation is to win people’s obedience to a consensus, by simply controlling the content of that consensus. Controlling the content of a consensus can frequently be done with simple, repeated propaganda. And yet, so few people seem to recognize just how easily a consensus can be socially engineered and manipulated. They are certainly made aware this happens, especially when it’s pointed out to them in an obvious way. Yet they continue to resist. How much stress does shutting out this awareness cause, and how damaging can it be?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society707 views0 answers0 votesGaining wisdom would seem to be the proper way to graduate from consensus thinking—knowing the truth but having enough awareness that putting it on full display can be hazardous to one’s health. Can Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol can help every human obtain that wisdom in the least painful and traumatic way possible?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Problems in Society663 views0 answers0 votesWhat is the reason the man my targeted client discussed with me, who has known her for 30 years and seemed in alignment with the light, had a falling out with her and abandoned her?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control551 views0 answers0 votesCan Creator share how prayer work and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the only hope there is for liberating the galaxy from ET Alliance domination?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers783 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Regarding SARS-CoV-2 deaths in India, there is now overwhelming scientific evidence, that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated or purified. At no time there was a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. Therefore if this is true, the PCR test does not test for the SARS-CoV-2 and all positive tests are then “false positives.” Also, there is growing evidence that the so called “vaccines,” are doing more harm than good, so we have been lied to by World Governments. Can you please advise us if this is really the truth?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19717 views0 answers0 votesHe asks: “Then all of these people that are dying in India, (and from other parts of the world), what are they are dying of? If the SARS-CoV-2 is not the culprit, is this infection caused by a bioweapon? Can you please help us understand what it is going on (culling of the population?) so that we can filter all the lies and confusion we all have at this point in time? This way we can focus our prayers on the “proper cause” and direct divine healing to the same, for all humanity at large.” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19733 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “With so much conflicting information about COVID and vaccinations, I’ve become so unsure how to recognize what is truth and what is misinformation. Is it beneficial to my health to take the vaccine or will it create greater health or societal problems in the future? Is the risk of not receiving the COVID vaccination greater or more problematic than the risks of getting it?”ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19701 views0 answers0 votesA viewer writes: “Dr. Richard Fleming is a Physicist and Nuclear Cardiologist. He first presented in 1994 a theory to the American Heart Association why people with the SARS-CoV-2 virus could manifest an inflammo-thrombotic disease – we now know as COVID-19. This theory of inflammation and heart disease accounts for why people with comorbidities were dying of COVID-19 – because they weren’t being treated for these known effects.” Is this the case, or only part of the story?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19587 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “He said this is not a naturally occurring virus (we know) and he followed the trails leading to the Gain-of-Function work, where the money came from, who funded it, etc. The spike protein contains human genome sequences inserted into the spike protein, and that this spike protein is doing EXACTLY WHAT IT WAS DESIGNED TO DO, which is to increase infection and create inflammation and blood clots.” Is this all true?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19637 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “He said the vaccines actually have components in them to DISSOLVE blood clots, indicating that this was a known effect.” Is this true?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19565 views0 answers0 votesHe continues: “When the coronavirus was simply being transmitted person to person, it was only people with increased vulnerability due to comorbidities, such as diabetes and heart disease, that were having issues with inflammation and blood clots, which they were NOT being treated for. Now with the vaccine, the body is being turned into a spike protein-producing factory, and so people with otherwise healthy immune systems are now having inflammo-thrombotic issues. This is why we’re seeing the deaths he says.” Is this true? Are the vaccines causing deaths through this mechanism? If so, what is the incidence?ClosedNicola asked 5 years ago • Coronavirus COVID-19542 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola