DWQA Questions › Tag: divine inspiration
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
How effective would use of the Vitablosom 2000 mg per 2 ml Vitamin C Liquid, used as a mouthwash to coat the gums be, in treating periodontal gum disease, compared to a 1.7% hydrogen peroxide soaking gel used daily along with a mouth tray, such as the Periogel, Perio Restore, or Perio-Care products?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
70 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
39 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has said that Liposomal Vitamin C from Vitablosom could help with gum disease of viral origin. Is this also likely to be safe and effective if given to dogs? There aren’t any obvious dog toxic additives on the label. I understand that dogs naturally synthesize vitamin C in their liver, unlike humans, and that oral vitamin C is generally well tolerated in dogs, but very high doses can cause diarrhea or gastrointestinal upset. Given this product has a serving size of 2 ml (40 drops) and vitamin C per serving of 2,000 mg, would 5 drops (0.25–0.28 ml of 1:1 diluted solution ≈140 mg vitamin C), be safe and effective for a dog of 7kg?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
54 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Are contact lenses generally safe, or are there inherent risks to be aware of? If there are risks, how can they be mitigated?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
153 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have been wearing glasses since I was young. I suspect I actually didn’t need them, but it was foisted on me due to a concerned family friend who raised the alarm to my parents when I complained of not being able to see the blackboard from the back of the classroom. I think this was a temporary fluctuation in vision acuity, but the glasses themselves paralyze eye muscles and lock in bad vision. First of all, is my theory correct that the glasses themselves deteriorated my eyesight to the point of a vicious cycle of dependency?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Glasses and contact lenses are a nuisance to me. I am athletic and they get in the way. I have rejected LASIK eye surgery until now due to the risks. However, recently, I have been thinking more about it. It would be liberating not to have to depend on glasses or contacts anymore. I think it would make me more resilient physically, especially considering the tough times ahead, as well as protect me from the risk of not having my glasses on hand (they can break, too) or running out of contact lenses. I also get uncomfortable with glasses and contacts, and sometimes get headaches. They sure do get in the way of fun as well. And I spend a lot of time in front of the computer, and again, vision correction causes extra strain. I know several people that have done the surgery and they report no problems years after. But there are also lots of warnings about risks, such as blurry vision and regression after some time. Overall, I know the divine realm is not in favor of surgery. Considering that we need to be in top form with minimal obstacles to effectiveness for the mission, and considering that I am also supported by the protocols to mitigate risks, would it be best for me to do this procedure? Or are there serious risks that could become a net negative and is it best to continue relying on glasses/contact lenses?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I’m sure protection prayers will and have helped, but can a house with high radon readings be “cleared” and have the divine realm remove or divert the flow to somewhere of no consequence?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
98 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has frequently stressed the necessity of adding specificity to prayer requests, but how far is the optimal level? Take coronary heart disease. Is it optimal to specify the biochemistry that needs addressing to mitigate risk, for example: “Minimize arterial plaque creation, excess blood sugar, inflammation and oxidative stress, slow fat buildup and foam cell formation in the artery wall, maintain healthy blood pressure, smooth blood flow, and flexible arteries to reduce stress on plaques, prevent rupture or clot formation, and reduce mechanical stress on plaques to prevent cracks and avoid blood clots?” Does it help to be this specific for other health conditions?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
The oral healthcare product, Provadent, is dispensed as two chewable tablets containing “Organic Xylitol, A natural sweetener that supports a balanced oral microbiome and helps maintain fresh breath; BioFresh™ Clean Complex (containing Beta-gluconase, (endo-1,3(4)-), Deoxyribonuclease, Glucan endo-1,3-alpha glucosidase) a proprietary blend of natural ingredients that contribute to a clean, vibrant oral environment; Cranberry Extract, known for their potential benefits in promoting oral health; Purple Carrot Powder, packed with nutrients, and contributes to your overall well-being; 4 Strains of Probiotics, carefully selected probiotic strains work together to support oral wellness, helping you maintain a balanced mouth microbiome and support healthy bacteria to optimize your smile.” They claim this prevents formation of biofilm that leads to plaque build-up. How does this rank in effectiveness for countering gum disease and tooth decay compared to ProDentim?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
88 views0 answers0 votes
Would it be advantageous to add vitamin C to our Antiviral Regimen? Would it effectively replace galangal as number 10 on the list, or does it deserve to be higher in rank order than number 10 on the list? If worthy of addition to the Antiviral Regimen, what would its rank be in having antitumor effects?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
123…42Next »
Ask Question