DWQA Questions › Tag: divine perspective
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
You have said you would not recommend fenbendazole for treating or preventing cancer, but would support use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Andreas Kalcker promotes treatment of cancer using Chlorine Dioxide Solution to first reach a clinical redox plateau, then introduces albendazole/fenbendazole to impose mitotic stress, and then adds ivermectin to quiet excitatory signaling. In this scenario, the fenbendazole is used to block glucose handling by cancer cells to limit energy availability, and destabilize microtubules to hinder cell division. Is his theory sound? Is his timed sequence a more elegant way to utilize fenbendazole effectively to derive benefit?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “An article [on the Internet] discusses the potential of fenbendazole, a common antiparasitic drug used in veterinary medicine, as a treatment for cancer. Fenbendazole (FBZ) has gained attention due to anecdotal reports suggesting it may have anticancer properties. FBZ may also enhance the efficacy of traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. FBZ though has no clinical literature as an anti-cancer treatment. How likely is it that FBZ could be a safe and effective anti-cancer treatment given that there are no treatment protocols, dosage, or side effect knowledge?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “My Soul Mate Cat recently passed away at 9 and a half years which is young for the breed he is. He meant the world to me. Is he okay and is there anything he would like me to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
78 views0 answers0 votes
We noticed our dog start to reduce his activity and become lethargic and unwilling to take stairs, etc., right after we returned from a 12-day trip while our son stayed in our home to dog-sit. The vet has been unable to diagnose a physical malady. Could our absence, perhaps experienced as possible abandonment, have triggered past karmic trauma to undermine his health? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
42 views0 answers0 votes
Advanced Bionutritionals recently announced sale of Thyrovanz which contains 100 mg of bovine thyroid glandular powder. This natural ingredient includes thyroid hormones T1, T2, T3, T4, and Calcitonin, which supports healthy thyroid function. Is the only advantage of Thyrovanz that it will better help the 15% of hypothyroid patients who have abnormal conversion of T4 to T3 than would be done using the Armour Thyroid extract, or does Thyrovanz also deliver a healthier balance or more effective supplementation of endogenous hormone production?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
Is Thyrovanz, an extract of bovine thyroid glands containing thyroid hormones T4, T3, T2, T1, and Calcitonin, a safe and effective hormonal source for reversing hypothyroidism? What percent of those with low thyroid function would be helped significantly to regain their energy and resolve their other symptoms?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
50 views0 answers0 votes
Is Thyrovanz more effective than Synthroid (levothyroxine, a synthetic form of thyroxine)? Does it suppress natural thyroid hormone production like Synthroid, creating the need for lifelong administration?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
17 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank Thyrovanz compared with prescription Armour Thyroid, which has both T4 and T3 from pig thyroid glands, or would each supplement be more advantageous for specific subpopulations of sufferers? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
My client has hypothyroidism and hearing loss. What is causing these conditions and what will help her heal?
ClosedNicola asked 4 days ago • 
16 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I will often watch a program about something and see someone that has passed over and have in mind to include that person in my next LHP-DSMR session. However, I sometimes can’t remember the person I had in mind for when I do a session, but do remember that there was someone I wanted to include. Can Creator still go back to that initial thought I had and include it as part of the session with my intention to want this person as part of my protocol session? I would have said yes, but perhaps this isn’t so?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
Scientists studying genetics of bacteria in marine plankton stumbled on a novel species of primitive organism they named Sukunaarchaeum mirabile, after a deity in Japanese mythology, renowned for its small size. Classified as belonging to the domain of Archaea, it lacks all recognizable metabolic pathways, primarily encoding machinery for its replication by a host organism, having less than half the DNA of the smallest archaeal. While some scientists believe viruses are not truly living, you have told us that is a false conclusion. Can this new, most primitive, virus-like entity be considered a life form?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
42 views0 answers0 votes
Is this or other similar Archaeal species, perhaps undiscovered, pathogenic and contributing to the chronic disease burden of society?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
Is [Name Withheld] now safely in the light following our Spirit Rescue session with the Lightworker Healing Protocol?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
I am concerned about recommending people take 12 mg of ivermectin daily for 3 weeks (along with hydroxychloroquine). Was I over-influenced by having that interchange with [Name Withheld] about “his protocol” to believe that giving both compounds would effect a viral cleanout? Was this a lesson to me about being more thorough, knowing as I investigated the literature about appropriate doses of ivermectin I would see the pharmacokinetic data, revealing the inability of oral administration to reach antiviral concentrations? What is most important for me to know?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
31 views0 answers0 votes
Recommending use of ivermectin in a way that is not even scientifically supportable seems like a big risk, even if you say it will work. What am I missing? How can high protein binding not be a hindrance to achieving a therapeutic exposure to free drug? Is there a scientific phenomenon here not yet scientifically understood or appreciated, at least not be me? Can you give us a tutorial to explain your continued endorsement and value of ivermectin, in addition to hydroxychloroquine which has demonstrated in vivo efficacy as an antiviral?
ClosedNicola asked 5 days ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
123…54Next »
Ask Question