DWQA Questions › Tag: DSMRFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesSpeaking in tongues once served a critical need, which arguably is no longer needed due to the modern advent of Internet communications and even real-time translation software and utilities. The language barrier that has existed since shortly after the reseeding of humanity some 200,000 years ago, and encapsulated in the biblical Tower of Babel story, is firmly coming down. Language is no longer a barrier in our modern world. Therefore, as remarkable and inspiring as speaking in tongues is, it just isn’t needed like it once was. And it certainly isn’t needed if, as St. Paul put it, “no man understandeth him.” So what IS needed? Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need now to be in divine alignment and save humanity?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divine Realm368 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “I will often watch a program about something and see someone that has passed over and have in mind to include that person in my next LHP-DSMR session. However, I sometimes can’t remember the person I had in mind for when I do a session, but do remember that there was someone I wanted to include. Can Creator still go back to that initial thought I had and include it as part of the session with my intention to want this person as part of my protocol session? I would have said yes, but perhaps this isn’t so?” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Lightworker Healing Protocol250 views0 answers0 votesYou told us some time back that a good ratio for doing a series of healings would be to do an equal number of Deep Subconscious Channeling with Trauma Resolution and Lightworker Healing Protocol sessions, by simply alternating them in sequence. Is this still the case, or has the coupling of LHP with the Deep Subconscious Mind Reset protocol compensated for the more labor-intensive deep subconscious channeling approach, which requires a channeler and a facilitator?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Subconscious Channeling285 views0 answers0 votesScientists studying genetics of bacteria in marine plankton stumbled on a novel species of primitive organism they named Sukunaarchaeum mirabile, after a deity in Japanese mythology, renowned for its small size. Classified as belonging to the domain of Archaea, it lacks all recognizable metabolic pathways, primarily encoding machinery for its replication by a host organism, having less than half the DNA of the smallest archaeal. While some scientists believe viruses are not truly living, you have told us that is a false conclusion. Can this new, most primitive, virus-like entity be considered a life form?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers268 views0 answers0 votesIs this or other similar Archaeal species, perhaps undiscovered, pathogenic and contributing to the chronic disease burden of society?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Interlopers261 views0 answers0 votesIs [Name Withheld] now safely in the light following our Spirit Rescue session with the Lightworker Healing Protocol?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Transition (Crossing Over)262 views0 answers0 votesI am concerned about recommending people take 12 mg of ivermectin daily for 3 weeks (along with hydroxychloroquine). Was I over-influenced by having that interchange with [Name Withheld] about “his protocol” to believe that giving both compounds would effect a viral cleanout? Was this a lesson to me about being more thorough, knowing as I investigated the literature about appropriate doses of ivermectin I would see the pharmacokinetic data, revealing the inability of oral administration to reach antiviral concentrations? What is most important for me to know?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Healing Modalities225 views0 answers0 votesRecommending use of ivermectin in a way that is not even scientifically supportable seems like a big risk, even if you say it will work. What am I missing? How can high protein binding not be a hindrance to achieving a therapeutic exposure to free drug? Is there a scientific phenomenon here not yet scientifically understood or appreciated, at least not be me? Can you give us a tutorial to explain your continued endorsement and value of ivermectin, in addition to hydroxychloroquine which has demonstrated in vivo efficacy as an antiviral?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Healing Modalities226 views0 answers0 votesYou have told us a major reason for the delays in not yet seeing the tidal power outages, gold reset, and Alien Disclosure is to plan and execute a truly major financial collapse as a painful motivation for human acceptance of the Alien Disclosure with their deceptive offer to help. Is an additional reason for extra time being needed that they want to feel smug and secure while they take their temporary break in withdrawing from our world, knowing we will be decimated and suffering, ideally, the whole time they are on a multi-year vacation? That might well require much more detailed planning and orchestration to optimize. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Agenda320 views0 answers0 votesIn a paper on the pharmacokinetics of ivermectin, they report that even at a very high dose, free plasma levels never get close to the concentration needed, shown by in vitro studies, to demonstrate antiviral activity because ivermectin is 93% bound to plasma proteins. Yet, you have reassured us that taking an oral dose of 12 mg daily for 3 weeks would be effective in many cases for getting a profound, if not total, eradication of susceptible chronic viruses. Can you explain how that is possible?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Healing Modalities201 views0 answers0 votesA practitioner asks: “Having listened to an “Alien Agenda Update” from months ago it was said that the ETs are only going to retreat in case ET disclosure happens. Does that mean that prayers directed to a prevention of ET disclosure won’t be followed up on by the divine? Given that people are so programmed humanity is going to accept the ETs quite certainly which would lead to annihilation. What should our prayers focus on after ET disclosure happens in order to save humanity? Wouldn’t it be safer to prevent ET disclosure and the ETs staying here instead of them retreating?” Can you help clarify once again, the main agenda items that the interlopers want to happen and what is unavoidable, so prayer power is not being misdirected?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Human Potential362 views0 answers0 votesMuch has been said about the Divine Rules of Engagement since the beginning of the Get Wisdom Project, and viewers are encouraged to review the copious material on GetWisdom.com, especially the searchable Divine Wisdom Database. In this show, we aim to explore novel questions, in the hope of bringing forward new insights and understandings about how the divine interacts with the physical universe and humanity in particular. Creator has shared that the future survival of humanity as a species depends on successfully triggering and launching a mass Ascension to a new “Ascended Earth” that Christ and the divine realm are preparing for and anticipating. One of the many new attainments when this has been achieved is a new level of behavioral and creative freedom never before afforded to an entire species of light beings. New freedoms essentially mean New Rules of Engagement. The question is, will those new rules apply only to life on Ascended Earth, or to new worlds and creations brought about by Ascended Humanity, or will these new rules apply to ALL of present creation? Will Ascended Humans have greater freedom to interact with physical beings and spirits stuck in limbo than is now the case with members of the divine realm presently? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divine Realm230 views0 answers0 votesShortly after Christ’s resurrection, he is said to have ascended to heaven in his physical body, and this was witnessed by several individuals who have shared their testimony. Did anything change for HIM as a result of this attainment, so far as the rules of engagement are concerned? Is he still bound by the same rules of engagement in place before his Ascension, or is he able to operate under the NEW rules anticipated for Ascended Humanity on a new Ascended Earth? If not, does he have to wait for the mass Ascension itself before he can operate under new rules of engagement, like everyone else? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divine Realm325 views0 answers0 votesSuccessful Hollywood Film Producer Paul Davids and Dr. Gary Schwartz of the University of Arizona, who has spent much of his career scientifically studying whether human consciousness survives death and if mediumship is authentic, have co-authored a 2016 book entitled An Atheist in Heaven. Paul Davids was good friends with the late Forrest J. Ackerman who is the subject atheist of the book. Forrest was known for saying he did not believe in life after death, but if it turned out he was wrong, he would “drop them a line.” It turns out Forrest (known to his friends as “Forry”) ended up dropping many lines to many people, as the book shares in great detail. One such incident was with a filmmaker from Canada who attended Forry’s memorial service. Afterwards, this filmmaker went to Forry’s crypt and knocked on the marble, saying out loud, “Uncle Forry, hi, it’s us, Michael and Ian, we’ve come to show our movie about you at the tribute for you.” They returned to their hotel room where Mike wanted to update a Facebook blog. This required a CAPTCHA code readable by humans but not computers. To Michael’s astonishment, the code that came up was “Ackerman000.” Michael felt this was a direct response to knocking on Forry’s crypt. A few moments later, Michael’s friend Ian blurted out, “Is he really dead?” The following sentence is verbatim from the book: “At that moment, the second phenomenon occurred, this time from Ian’s computer. A voice blurted out the words, ‘Oh my God, no way!'” Was Forry doing this? Was he in the light at the time, or still in limbo? And how does all this fit within the rules of engagement? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divine Realm300 views0 answers0 votesWhile researching this topic, Brian was watching the documentary film by Paul Davids, The Life After Death Project. On a coffee table next to Brian was his iPad in sleep mode. Suddenly, the iPad woke up spontaneously out of sleep mode, and a childlike voice blurted out the words, “I think you’re pretty great, too!” The iPad promptly went back into sleep mode. Brian immediately recognized how this was a nearly identical incident that occurred to filmmaker Ian described in the question just discussed. The voice was described as “childlike” in that occurrence as well. Years ago, in the 1980s, Brian was doing some experimental channeling with a friend when the spirit being channeled told Brian, “You have the opportunity to be great …” Was Forry referring to that channeling from decades ago? Why would Forry think Brian was “pretty great, too?” When Forry got to the light, did he, too, learn about the Get Wisdom Project and take an interest in it, even reviewing the akashic records of its founders? Did Forry think Brian was “pretty great” because of the Spirit Rescue and Lightworker Healing Protocol session work he did for him? What can Creator tell us about this occurrence, why those words were chosen, and how it all fits into the rules of engagement?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Divine Realm198 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola