DWQA Questions › Tag: Gaia
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “When the LHP removes spirit attachments they are offered rehabilitation. Some accept, but most probably decline and they are ‘removed’ from the scene. We know and have heard the term ‘catch and release’ more than once. The question is where are they released to when dealt with in a Spirit Rescue scenario? Are they even moved at all, or is it more like being handcuffed and placed in the squad car only until the ‘victim’ (the one being rescued and helped to the light) is transitioned and safe, and then these spirits who declined rehab are simply ‘uncuffed and released?'” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
243 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “We also know that the divine and archangels have set up a shield around Earth to prevent further incursion by the forces of evil in spirit form. My intuition tells me it’s just hold them in place until the rescue is over, and then release them right where they’re at. The question is, can we do one better? Can we ask that they be removed from Earth altogether and released beyond the shield the divine has set up in response to LHP requests? Or is this something the divine would prefer not to do, as it will hasten their demise and essentially not give them every opportunity to be rescued themselves?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “If it is deemed a ‘fair’ strategy, to release forces of evil in spirit form from Earth altogether and released beyond the shield the divine has set up in response to LHP requests, given they’ve been cut off from Divine Life Support, are essentially illegal trespassers, and in consideration of future, hapless victims, can we request this be done? Could this be an enhancement to the LHP? (Funny how this question so strongly parallels the current illegal immigrant and border situation, and ICE and Trump’s agenda to deport them. At the very least, this answer should reveal more about the divine dilemma regarding this topic.)” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
210 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Having listened to an “Alien Agenda Update” from months ago it was said that the ETs are only going to retreat in case ET disclosure happens. Does that mean that prayers directed to a prevention of ET disclosure won’t be followed up on by the divine? Given that people are so programmed humanity is going to accept the ETs quite certainly which would lead to annihilation. What should our prayers focus on after ET disclosure happens in order to save humanity? Wouldn’t it be safer to prevent ET disclosure and the ETs staying here instead of them retreating?” Can you help clarify once again, the main agenda items that the interlopers want to happen and what is unavoidable, so prayer power is not being misdirected?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
273 views0 answers0 votes
Was this reporting in Scientific American accurate in its speculations: “Bird flu showed up on dairy farms and surprised everyone. How did bird flu jump to cows?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
126 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I feel authorities use this term as a deception to hide behind. I usually tell people that, “There are no coincidences, there is only cause and effect.” Would this be an accurate statement? What can Creator tell us to help expand our knowledge base on this topic?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
112 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Is the hydrino source of energy important for our survival and Gaia’s benefit once the interlopers withdraw?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
330 views0 answers0 votes
On April 7, 2025, an editorial in Scientific American’s Today in Science stated: “Yet another spate of devastating tornadoes struck last week in east Texas, Tennessee, and other southern and southeastern states. As we reported in 2023, tornado alley is shifting east, with more frequent and more intense twister touchdowns. The cause? You guessed it: climate change. Warmer and moister air rises, forming supercell storm clouds that fuel tornados.” How correct is this analysis?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
334 views0 answers0 votes
The death toll from the earthquake in Myanmar on March 28, 2025, is now over 1600 and expected to grow as more ruins are inspected. What caused this devastating event in a country already ravaged by civil war?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
300 views0 answers0 votes
One of the reasons an atheist might cite for why they don’t believe in God, or at the very least a “loving God,” is the huge number of noxious species of microbial, plant, and animal life on this planet. There are so many that it is practically impossible to catalog them all, and new ones are being discovered on literally a DAILY basis. Scientists estimate the average somewhere between 40-55 new species are discovered each day. Certainly, a percentage of those could be labeled “noxious,” in that they are harmful to humans in some way, either directly or indirectly, through attacking another plant or animal species that is beneficial to humans. Of the 40-55 new species discovered each day, what rough percentage are truly NEW-to-Earth species that have been introduced just in the last decade? How big is this problem, and how long has it been going on? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
374 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about the American Chestnut Tree: “By the 1940s the blight had killed an estimated four billion American chestnut trees nationwide. Where before about a third of all trees in the Smoky Mountains were chestnuts, today even single spindly saplings are rare.” The chestnut blight fungus was supposedly introduced from Asia accidently. To give people an idea of just how tragic this massive loss was, here is a brief description found on forestpathology.org of the value of the chestnut tree: “If you could custom design the ideal tree species, you couldn’t come up with a better one than American chestnut. It was a huge, majestic tree, with a very straight stem. The wood was nearly ideal. As George Hepting has written, ‘Not only was baby’s crib likely made of chestnut, but chances were, so was the old man’s coffin.’ One of its good qualities was high durability. The heartwood could be used in situations where decay was a hazard. The tree was common. It made up about 50% of most eastern hardwood forests. It grew fast and would regenerate itself by root sprouts vigorously. The nuts were edible, not only by wildlife but also by humans. It was an important food source for all. ‘The farmer’s hogs were fattened on chestnuts, and, to no small degree, his children were also.’ Chestnut was also prized as a landscape tree.” If indeed the blight did come from Asia, how long had it been in Asia, and what was its true origin? What can Creator tell us about the tragic loss of the American Chestnut?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
353 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about Zebra Mussels: “Zebra mussels are small, freshwater, bivalve shellfish that were likely brought to the U.S. as stowaways in the ballast water of ships. They are native to the Caspian and Black Seas south of Russia and Ukraine, and have since become widespread in both Europe and the U.S.” The zebra mussel is a problem because it is so prolific. Each female can release up to a million eggs a year. “Biofouling is [an ecological problem] … Zebra mussels will attach to native mussels much like they do docks, boats, and water and power plant intake pipes, and in large enough numbers can prevent the natives from moving, feeding, reproducing, or regulating water properly. The zebra mussels also outcompete the natives for food and space, and because of their fast reproduction can quickly overwhelm a water system. The feeding habits of zebra mussels can also have a drastic impact on an infested lake. Zebra mussels are filter feeders that siphon particles of plankton from the water. They are highly efficient at this, and a large population of mussels can quickly clear the water of almost all floating particles. This change can cause shifts in local food webs, both by robbing food from native species that feed on plankton and also by increasing water clarity and thus making it easier for visual predators to hunt.” The costs to control and clean up zebra mussel infestations is enormous. And the problem never goes away, it can only be managed. This species is so good at causing problems, it couldn’t have been a truly native creature in the Black Sea either. It seems tailor-made for another WORLD and doesn’t belong here at ALL. What is Creator’s perspective, and what kind of environment is a good fit for this creature?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
287 views0 answers0 votes
There have been reports of egg prices soon going as high as twenty dollars a dozen in some locations. This is presumably due to a bird flu epidemic and a government policy of killing entire flocks of egg-laying hens, some numbering in the millions of birds. What is the true origin of bird flu, and is this drastic approach to its management and prevention called for in any way that could be considered rational? What is actually the bigger cause of the egg shortage, the invasive bird flu virus, or possible mind control manipulation surrounding its management? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
361 views0 answers0 votes
Whether a species is invasive or not might depend on a number of factors. The European hare is considered a native species of Europe and a valuable one at that. But the same species imported into Australia has been disastrous. Google has this to say about the problem: “Rabbits are a serious environmental and agricultural pest in Australia. They were introduced for sport hunting in the late 18th century, but their rapid reproduction rate led to millions of rabbits. Rabbits cost the Australian economy over $200 million per year. They compete with livestock for food, damage crops, and destabilize the land. Rabbits overgraze, which can lead to soil erosion, the collapse of indigenous plants, and the decline of native animals. They may have also caused the extinction of several small ground dwelling mammals. Rabbits threaten the survival of more than 300 Australian native species, including 24 critically endangered species.” Are these rabbits truly native to Earth, or are they an interloper-introduced invasive species? If native, then is this a wholly human-created problem, or were the humans who brought them to Australia for “sport” influenced to do that by the interlopers? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
512 views0 answers0 votes
It seems with the advent of modern civilization, global media, and global travel, that the opportunity for the interlopers to introduce large land-based mammalian and reptilian creatures, like lions and crocodiles, has effectively expired. Such an introduction today would draw too much attention and be too much of an anomaly. Not so with anything aquatic or small, as in small insects and even birds. Same with any kind of plant life. So while we’re not being overrun globally with new mammoths and saber-toothed tigers, we are being overrun with almost every other kind of invasive species. Creator has previously commented on the “Beast of Gévaudan,” a very large and very vicious species of wolf. Was this the last time the interlopers tried to seriously introduce such a creature, and did they conclude that the opportunity to do this further had passed? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
324 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous12345…32Next »
Ask Question