DWQA Questions › Tag: giants
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
120 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
236 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
132 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
139 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
268 views0 answers0 votes
Understanding the “greater than normal need for stimulation” helps us make sense of the numerous stone images of the Anunnaki throughout the Middle East. Not only are they giants, averaging 12 to 15 feet tall, but all of them appeared exceptionally “athletic” and muscular. And possessing advanced medical capabilities that can replace even lost limbs and organs, this would give them license to engage in “extreme sports” including combat sports with each other. Is it safe to say the Anunnaki are “high-strung,” impatient with everything, and bore easily? This sounds like the LAST kind of being you would want “lording over you?” How much of their average day is spent working out? Are they all “obsessed bodybuilder gym rats?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, about sociopaths, “The intellectual difference between right and wrong does not bring on the emotional sirens and flashing blue lights, or the fear of God, that it does for the rest of us. Without the slightest blip of guilt or remorse, one in twenty-five people can do anything at all.” She further wrote, “The presence or absence of conscience is a deep human division, arguably more significant than intelligence, race, or even gender.” “But as to what is possibly the single most meaningful characteristic that divides human species (and humans from extraterrestrials) – the presence or absence of conscience – we (humans) remain effectively oblivious.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
192 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “A good psychopath can play a concerto on anyone’s heart strings … Your best defense is to understand the nature of these human predators.” Does that naturally and rationally extend to the extraterrestrial predators as well, and that the number one way they “play on our heart strings” is through channeling directly to humans who share those words with the world? Is our best defense against Anunnaki psychics, our attempts to understand the nature of these extraterrestrial predators? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
213 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “It is crucial to note that all of the psychiatric diagnoses (including narcissism) involve some amount of personal distress or misery for the individuals who suffer from them.” “Sociopathy stands alone as a ‘disease’ that causes no dis-ease for the person who has it, no subjective discomfort. Sociopaths are often quite satisfied with themselves and with their lives, and perhaps for this very reason there is no effective treatment.” She also wrote, “We (humans) feel that if someone is bad, he should be burdened with the knowledge that he is bad. It seems to us the ultimate injustice that a person could be evil, by our assessment, and still feel fine about himself.” And even though beings like the Anunnaki don’t feel guilt, do they still try to make each other aware of their awfulness? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
192 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stout wrote, “Sociopaths are infamous for their refusal to acknowledge responsibility for the decisions they make, or for the outcomes of their decisions. In fact, a refusal to see the results of one’s bad behavior as having anything to do with oneself – ‘consistent irresponsibility’ in the language of the American Psychiatric Association – is a cornerstone of the antisocial personality diagnosis. People without conscience provide endless examples of such stunning ‘I’ve done nothing wrong’ statements. Instead, when confronted with a destructive outcome that is clearly their doing, they will say, plain and simple, ‘I never did that,’ and will to all appearances believe their own direct lie. This feature of sociopathy makes self-awareness impossible, and in the end, just as the sociopath has no genuine relationships with other people, he has only a very tenuous one with himself.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
192 views0 answers0 votes
Nothing says “Divine Level Problem” like “Sociopath.” The good news is, contrary to what most psychological professionals sincerely believe, that this is a noncorrectable problem, Creator has emphatically said the opposite—that it absolutely is correctible and it is up to humans to correct it. The missing ingredient, however, is “divine partnership.” Without it, the professionals are indeed correct in assuming the problem is not at all fixable. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support can be the means by which, eventually but not quickly, we humans, in partnership with the divine, can indeed correct the problem of sociopathy and the evil it causes throughout the universe, and for all of time?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
209 views0 answers0 votes
Prior to the recent agreement to withdraw after the Disclosure Event and take a break from their endless manipulations of our planet and everything on it, has it been a kind of free-for-all, where many individuals can come and take a turn, perhaps competing amongst their brethren to see who can be most clever, most destructive, most innovative, and so on? Or is there an agreed on main agenda where all must follow an approved set of guidelines and goals? There have been at least a couple major motion pictures having a futuristic theme where people can use an advanced technology to journey to an artificial world and adopt a persona to have lifelike experiences for fun and relaxation, or challenge and excitement. One was Westworld, depicting people going back to the old West to take on gunslingers, and more recently, the movie Total Recall, where people could pay to have a vacation in their mind that was totally lifelike. Both movies showed a dark side in having an unexpected blending with reality. This was also a theme used many times in the Star Trek franchise, in having spaceships with a Holodeck that future explorers could visit during long voyages as a lifelike experiencing of other worlds and plotlines for fun and learning opportunities. Are these a kind of inversion of what the extraterrestrials do in visiting our world, coming to participate as observers who can manipulate us, in reality, to act out their fantasies and darkest thoughts for amusement and gratification, but without taking any risk themselves?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
424 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “If we succeed in making the Extraterrestrial Alliance withdraw, would this be done with or without the knowledge of their hybrid minions in the global power structure?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
365 views0 answers0 votes
He asks: “Will the Extraterrestrial Alliance’s hybrid minions be charged with keeping an eye on their farm, whilst away, maybe with the Mercenary Army Program recruits acting as overall watchdogs to ensure compliance?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • 
319 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous123456Next »
Ask Question