DWQA Questions › Tag: group-think
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a description circulating on the Internet claiming that the polio epidemic was misinformation based on assuming the polio virus was causing paralysis when it was actually a dangerous upsurge in spraying DDT indiscriminately, which is neurotoxic. What is the divine truth here?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
157 views0 answers0 votes
You have said you would not recommend fenbendazole for treating or preventing cancer, but would support use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Dr. Andreas Kalcker promotes treatment of cancer using Chlorine Dioxide Solution to first reach a clinical redox plateau, then introduces albendazole/fenbendazole to impose mitotic stress, and then adds ivermectin to quiet excitatory signaling. In this scenario, the fenbendazole is used to block glucose handling by cancer cells to limit energy availability, and destabilize microtubules to hinder cell division. Is his theory sound? Is his timed sequence a more elegant way to utilize fenbendazole effectively to derive benefit?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
41 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “An article [on the Internet] discusses the potential of fenbendazole, a common antiparasitic drug used in veterinary medicine, as a treatment for cancer. Fenbendazole (FBZ) has gained attention due to anecdotal reports suggesting it may have anticancer properties. FBZ may also enhance the efficacy of traditional cancer treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. FBZ though has no clinical literature as an anti-cancer treatment. How likely is it that FBZ could be a safe and effective anti-cancer treatment given that there are no treatment protocols, dosage, or side effect knowledge?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
129 views0 answers0 votes
A number of research studies have been called into question because of poor reproducibility when an attempt to replicate their findings failed. A “replication crisis” has been noted for psychology, sociology, education, economics, and medical research. For example, a detailed inquiry was mounted to replicate 193 experiments from 53 top cancer papers published from 2010-2012. Only a quarter of the original findings were able to be reproduced. Moreover, even for effects that were reproduced, the magnitude averaged 85% less than observed in the original investigations. This is concerning because such experiments are crucial for deciding what to pursue for drug development and when to proceed to clinical trials. Unreliable results not only waste money but expose patients to unnecessary risks. While there are many understandable reasons why results can vary, what can Creator tell us about hidden reasons for such poor reproducibility and their impact on the reliability of scientific inquiry?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
A recent post in Neuroscience News highlighted a new study that reveals a possible link between common herpesvirus infections and the early biological changes that precede dementia. “The strongest viral associations were seen for Epstein-Barr virus and HHV6 (human herpesvirus 6)…These findings support the hypothesis that chronic viral infections may accelerate neurodegeneration and raise dementia risk independently of genetic factors.” (“Human herpes viruses are associated with steeper age-dependent increases of serum biomarkers for dementia in cognitively unimpaired women” by Lisa M. James et al. Scientific Reports). Is this a valid clue supporting the viral causation of dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
83 views0 answers0 votes
Arguably, the biggest champion over the years for cancer as a metabolic disease and largely ignored by medical opinion leaders, has been Dr. Thomas Seyfried who has promoted ketogenic diets as an adjunct to conventional treatment. A state of ketosis lowers blood sugar which tumor cells need, and elevates ketone bodies which normal cells can use for energy but tumor cells can’t. But even he seems blind to the clues about viral causation. In a 2014 study in Cancer Letters, he augments his theory of the central role of metabolism in glioblastoma in describing how 90% of brain tumor cells are infected by cytomegalovirus, “which is a supercharger for allowing tumor cells to use glucose and glutamine.” That biochemical pathway allows energy for tumors to grow despite inadequate oxygenation. But he doesn’t ask, why are viruses there to begin with and what other role might they play? Is this an example of mind control suppression to limit scientific progress?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
71 views0 answers0 votes
You told us that the supplement, Pineal Guardian X was an effective cognitive enhancer and neuroprotectant, despite its unstated and likely modest concentration of its ingredients. You said you could help us resolve the mystery here after we do some research on what the supplement contains. What I have seen is that 8 of its 9 ingredients have been confirmed by scientific studies to possess antiviral activity, at least at high concentrations, while the manufacturer only describes other varied properties of these phytonutrients. Is there something being missed by researchers? Does one or more substance have much more potent activity on certain viruses than yet appreciated? Is there an unexpected synergistic effect of this particular combination of what may be only modest and weak antivirals? Or is there some other property making the supplement beneficial? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
You told us that the supplement Pineal Guardian X was the second in ranking among five we have asked about for preserving and improving cognitive function. Does it have any clinically significant antiviral activity within the central nervous system?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
35 views0 answers0 votes
I am having trouble accepting your recommendation of Pineal Guardian X. Although it has nine ingredients, the dose of these is unstated, and the consumer only ingests one eye dropper of liquid daily, so none can be present in appreciable concentrations. Can you confirm how this product can not only be of benefit, but ranked second among other doctor-recommended nutraceuticals for cognitive enhancement?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
44 views0 answers0 votes
Is fatty infiltration of the pancreas actually a consequence of a chronic viral infection, as is the case for fatty liver disease?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
96 views0 answers0 votes
I found a website offering Pineal Guardian called pineal-guardian.com. Why was the promo piece I asked you about using the brand name “Pineal Guardian X?” Are these marketing the same supplement from the same supplier or is one an imposter/imitator?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
35 views0 answers0 votes
You suggested the following rank order preference in overall benefit of supplements promoting cognitive function: Advanced Memory Formula, FocusIQ, Ceretrol, and RediMind, in that order. Where would you rank Pineal Guardian among these?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
22 views0 answers0 votes
Would it be safe and advantageous for those in need to take Pineal Guardian along with Advanced Memory Formula, FocusIQ, Ceretrol, and RediMind, if affordable?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
30 views0 answers0 votes
Are there two or three supplements for enhancing cognition which would be of particular value used in combination if taking all of these [Pineal Guardian, Advanced Memory Formula, FocusIQ, Ceretrol, and RediMind] becomes unaffordable?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
26 views0 answers0 votes
A supplement called Pineal Guardian reportedly contains: Yamabushitake extract (Lion’s Mane mushroom) to increase pineal gland size and reduce calcification; Spirulina that is rich in tryptophan to enhance melatonin production; “Phantom Miracle Tree” extract, sourced from a unique species of Moringa that has 90 nutrients for enhancing brain function and increasing melatonin as it reduces pineal gland calcification; Elder Tamarind to reduce pro-inflammatory molecules in brain tissue; French Maritime Pine Bark Extract to produce antioxidants and increase brain blood flow; Chlorella, Elder Mahogany Neem, Ginkgo Biloba, and Bacopa Monnieri for reducing oxidative stress in the brain, improving memory, protecting neurons and neuroplasticity, and preventing brain cell death. Their banner claims: “Data-Driven. Science-Backed. AI-Powered Results. What Happens When AI Reads 10,000 Clinical Studies? You get a formula that’s smarter, cleaner, and more effective. Designed by advanced AI. Verified by human experts. Built for real results.” Yet, they do not give a company name. Their narrative keeps quoting a “reclusive” Dr. Harrison, without stating any affiliation, and that Pineal Guardian X has been proven to work in 49,881 men and women, without citing any formal studies. Is this a safe and truly helpful product for treating cognitive decline, including severe dementia?
ClosedNicola asked 2 weeks ago • 
24 views0 answers0 votes
123…7Next »
Ask Question