DWQA Questions › Tag: healing perpetrators
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
We have shared comments about the paper in JAMA blowing the whistle on medical dangers, in pointing out that the U.S. healthcare system was the third leading cause of death in America (Starfield, B. Is US health really the best in the world? JAMA 2000 284:483-5). Things continue to raise questions. I just saw a citation of an editorial by Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, one of the world’s top medical journals, published in 2015 in which he says: “The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” While this is largely focused on the pressures to publish because of the vested interests of researchers, as well as journal editors, is there a deeper reason that quality and integrity suffer?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “In his 1970s book, Medical Nemesis, Ivan Illich suggests medicine isn’t the primary reason people survive illness; sanitation, nutrition, and housing matter more. He goes on to say over-treatment and exaggeration of disease are widespread, that healthcare fosters dependency, and that illness is seen as unacceptable. Healthcare often operates less for the benefit of patients and more to serve political, social, or bureaucratic interests – public image, economic concerns, or voter approval over medical advice. His views jarred badly with me. Is it right to say, in 2026, that people avoid confronting mortality and that modern healthcare is more about socio-political optics than illnesses?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
49 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “An overlooked aspect of modern medicine is perhaps that now normal human experiences—such as minor stress, aging, ‘high’ blood pressure, ‘high’ cholesterol, or childbirth—are labeled as medical problems that require professional intervention. Society has arguably become increasingly dependent on doctors and healthcare institutions, losing confidence in self-care and mutual support. Medical institutions now dictate social norms, defining what is ‘normal’ or ‘deviant,’ and expanding their authority into everyday life. Is this intended to weaken society’s resilience, creating a population that depends on the medical system for a ‘pharmaceutical invasion’ and even the conception of who is ‘ill?'”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
43 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “High blood pressure is conventionally regarded as a health risk and that lowering it reduces risk, especially in moderate-to-severe systolic BP of 140-159 mmHg. Dr. Malcolm Kendrick author of Doctoring Data claims that cardiovascular risk increases more steeply after systolic BP reaches around 160-170 mmHg—well beyond the 140/90 threshold often used to diagnose and treat hypertension. A rule of thumb in medicine is that for older individuals, a systolic BP of around 100 + age is a reasonable upper limit beyond which cardiovascular risks increase significantly. Is hypertension over-treated, given that aggressively lowering blood pressure—especially in older individuals—can be harmful?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
146 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2018 book, Medical Nihilism, by Jacob Stegenga claims the healthcare system over-adopts treatments and under-recognizes risks. He states confidence in the effectiveness of medical interventions should be low because empirical evidence for the efficacy of many treatments is weak due to methodological flaws, publication bias, the influence of commercial interests. He claims positive studies are more likely to be published, screening programs tend to detect and treat cancers that would never cause harm, common treatments can cause long-term complications, short trial durations miss long-term harms etc. How accurate is his view that evidence is systematically skewed and harms are undercounted?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
122 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Bernard Lown, a Harvard cardiologist in the 1980s, criticized the rapid rise of surgical Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts (CABG), noting 20–40% were potentially avoidable, especially in stable angina, and many patients had uncertain survival benefit. He advocated medical therapy—nitrates, beta-blockers, lifestyle changes—for symptom control. How accurate is it to say that in 2026, evidence-based guidelines and trials have reduced avoidable CABG to <10% for high-risk, guideline-selected patients, and that for low-risk, stable patients, surgery rarely improves survival, and that beta-blockers, nitrates, ACE inhibitors, lifestyle changes are to be preferred?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
115 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A 2012 paper in the British Medical Journal “Use of relative and absolute effect measures in reporting health inequalities” concluded that “75% (258/344) [of 2009 papers] reported only relative effect measures.” Absolute risk reduction is often far less impressive and less often stated. This suggests that physicians will overestimate the efficacy of treatments and patients may have a misplaced belief in both effectiveness and risks. To what extent does this practice mislead patients and clinicians and benefit pharmaceutical manufacturers?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
75 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Dr. Malcolm Kendrick in his book, Doctoring Data, suggests more patients are harmed by over-treatment than helped. He claims published treatment benefits are often exaggerated by hiding behind relative risk (to mask how tiny most benefits are), selective reporting (such as statistical significance without meaningful benefit), or clever framing (such as natural variation in cholesterol or blood pressure) is medicalized as a treatable condition. To what extent is published medical research actually the fabricated appearance of scientific rigor to sell a product?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
89 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “What percentage of patients take drugs for almost no real benefit, even while risking side effects and penalized by the cost?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
120 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “TLS, The Light System, claims to be an ancient organization working for the light. Whose gone public to expose the corrupt and prepare us for Disclosure and contact with “Good ETs.” Jason Shurka is their chosen spokesman and host for Unifyd Healing TV, and the Unifyd Healing Network. Ray claims to be a reincarnation from biblical bloodlines and is featured in many docuseries on the network. They have supported the spread of EE System Centers around the globe in a few short years. Promoting a protocol in the system to prepare for contact. Is TLS the Extraterrestrial Alliance. Is the EE System safe or weaponized? Are the power outages the false flag? What is most imp for us to know?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
99 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “There have been many channelers that have mentioned that the population of Earth will be reduced by 1/3 in the next 5 to 10 years or so, but are they channeling future projections that are worst case scenarios or is this the general plan prior to the ETs leaving us? Is what they’re seeing, people ascending as opposed to death by some sort of catastrophe? What is the current plan by the ETs in regards to population reduction and will that be more impoverished nations that will suffer mass death through a collapse of all systems?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
226 views0 answers0 votes
Creator was asked about the book, Thirty Years Among the Dead, by Psychiatrist Dr. Carl Wickland, published in 1934. Creator said, “This, indeed, is a valid and accurate reporting …” In the book, a discarnate spirit spoke about conditions in the spirit world surrounding Earth through Mrs. Anna Wickland (Dr. Wickland’s wife and trance medium). The spirit reported, “The Earth is a little globe. The globe has a sphere around it. The distance between the world of spirit and the world of matter is about sixty miles. This sphere is the world of the spirits in darkness. … Conditions that cannot be described, the most hideous, the most fiendish, so ugly that I cannot describe them.” On October 13, 2021, legendary 90-year-old actor William Shatner traveled into orbit on the privately built and operated Blue Origin suborbital rocket. Shatner wrote in his recent book: “… All I saw was death. I saw a cold, dark, black emptiness. It was unlike any blackness you can see or feel on Earth. It was deep, enveloping, all-encompassing. … It was among the strongest feelings of grief I have ever encountered. The contrast between the vicious coldness of space and the warm nurturing of Earth below filled me with overwhelming sadness. … It filled me with dread. My trip to space was supposed to be a celebration; instead, it felt like a funeral. I learned later that I was not alone in this feeling. It is called the ‘Overview Effect’ and is not uncommon among astronauts.” Is this common ‘Overview Effect’ a result of entering the sphere of ‘outer darkness?’ That by being in literal proximity physically to this realm of extreme spiritual suffering, do the astronauts involuntarily ‘tune in’ and feel directly this unseen collective anguish? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
163 views0 answers0 votes
Wickland in his introduction wrote: “Deprived of their physical sense organs, they are shut out from the physical light, and lacking a mental perception of the high purpose of existence, these individuals are spiritually blind and find themselves in a twilight – the ‘outer darkness’ mentioned in the Bible and linger in the realm known as the Earth Sphere. … Assuming spirit forms which are a result of their thought life on Earth, millions remain for a time in the Earth Sphere, and often in the environment of their Earth lives, still held by their habits or interests.” William James wrote through psychic Suzy Smith via automatic writing in The Book of James, “Your thoughts always modify your conditions. If you are unworthy because of having lived wickedly, your surroundings after death are abominably dismal. You move around very little, thinking yourself always to be in a dark fog or gray gloom. When you become aware of the inevitability of progress, conditions for you clear up at once.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
127 views0 answers0 votes
Harriet Shelton wrote a book published in 1957 entitled Abraham Lincoln Returns. In the Editor’s Forward, it is written, “Each morning at a set hour, a lady, now past eighty, sits in a corner of her room as she has done for many years, and faces a vast unseen audience. … A congregation of souls (discarnate human spirits) in desperate need of help. … They are, (Harriet explains) those who have left this life and reside in a place of shadows because of transgressions. … The words she speaks come to her in a state of semi-trance (meaning she is conscious of the clairaudiently prompted words she speaks, but promptly forgets them the moment they are uttered). The words come from entities who have made the fate of these bewildered souls their charge and their concern. Since the unfortunates are still closer to the Earth than they are to the spirit plane, they are more likely to listen and believe one still living on Earth.” So, in summation, Harriet Shelton would go into a semi-trance in her room alone. Alone only so far as being the only incarnated ‘still living on Earth’ person in the room. But we are told, there was, in fact, a vast audience of unseen spirits gathered to listen to her words—words channeled through her from the spirit of Abraham Lincoln. So, in fact, Abraham Lincoln was a spirit, channeling a message to OTHER SPIRITS through an incarnated human because the spirits he wishes to address will listen to a living human speaking to them, but not a fellow spirit, even one as lofty as Abraham Lincoln! This is an extraordinary state of affairs to contemplate, and challenging to even believe is necessary. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
147 views0 answers0 votes
And in case anyone thought Abraham Lincoln needing a human channel to talk to other spirits was a head scratcher, consider an entire company of spirit actors putting on an elaborate morality play for earthbound spirits via a lone human channeler!! In the book, Thirty Years Among the Dead, Dr. Carl Wickland wrote, “For many years, upon various occasions, a symbolical morality play has been given through Mrs. Wickland by a group of spirit actors. They are twelve in number, eleven actors and a director, all of whom were Russian-Slavonic when in earth life. The play is given in the Russian-Slavonic tongue, a language which Mrs. Wickland herself has never heard, but which is spoken perfectly through her by these actors, as has been stated by different persons, witnessing the play, who are familiar with the language.” These spirit actors were quoted as saying, “We give this play in the spirit world for the earthbound spirits, many of whom do not realize they are dead to their earth life. We find them in the sphere next to the Earth (the ‘outer darkness’ described in question one?) often in a semi-sleep. Preceding the play we have music by excellent musicians; this wakens the earthbound spirits, one after the other. They rise slowly, not realizing where they are, but the music brings them a little understanding of the higher life.” What is Creator’s perspective of this extraordinary undertaking of a joint spirit and living human undertaking to awaken and inspire earthbound spirits?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
143 views0 answers0 votes
123…33Next »
Ask Question