DWQA Questions › Tag: human egoFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesAfter reviewing Karl Mollison’s channeling of James Randi and Whitney Houston about their experiences with being stuck in limbo after they passed, it seems clear that the experience is not always “uniform.” Indeed, the experience and intensity of the negativity can vary from individual to individual. We’ve learned in the past that some human lost soul spirits actually attach themselves to the energy field of living humans and find some genuine protection and sanctuary from predation there. After encountering the séance results above, about “spirit groups” working together in what still appears to be limbo or the lower astral plane, is it the case that like-minded spirits band together and form “in limbo” teams or communities? Given the otherwise very negative nature of the lower astral plane, especially the fact that it is home to nefarious spirits of all kinds, banding together would seem to make some sense. In the same way it’s safer to walk through a bad neighborhood with a group of people rather than alone, does the same hold true for the lower astral plane and those stuck in it? Is there safety in numbers? Do such groups or teams or communities exist, and if so, how do they help to alter or make lower astral plane living more palatable, if at all? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm68 views0 answers0 votesIn the book, An Atheist in Heaven, Paul Davids writes about interviewing “arch skeptic” Dr. Michael Shermer, executive director of The Skeptics Society, and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine. Dr. Gary Schwartz, in the same book, characterized Dr. Shermer as a “Type II skeptic.” He writes, “Sadly, there are individuals who claim to be ‘skeptics’ who are not open minded. They do not engage in careful questioning. They are not discerning in their evaluation of evidence. Though they may claim – often insistently – that they are undecided and seek the truth, in practice they are disbelievers or ‘unbelievers.’ They hold strong beliefs about what must be impossible. Furthermore, they often engage in irresponsible and unjustified evaluation of theories, methods, findings, and conclusions which challenge their convictions about what is possible in nature and the cosmos. This is pseudo-skepticism. I call this ‘Type II Skepticism.'” During his interview with Paul Davids, Dr. Michael Shermer certainly came off as a “Type II Skeptic.” However, later in the book, and just before it was published, Dr. Shermer ended up having his own very “mysterious” experience that he confessed “shook his skepticism.” He was getting married and his bride had an old transistor radio that belonged to her deceased grandfather that hadn’t worked in decades. New batteries didn’t help – the radio was dead. On their wedding day, his bride said she wanted to say something to him alone, so they went to the back of the house where they heard music playing in the bedroom. They opened a drawer and found her grandfather’s radio playing a romantic love song. Other family members reported the music started playing just as the wedding was to begin. The next day, the radio went silent and never worked again. Dr. Shermer’s bride was reportedly a skeptic as well, so how could this happen within the rules of engagement, especially since we know the divine realm will go to great lengths to protect the beliefs of skeptics? So much so that just the presence of James Randi, for example, could literally temporarily disable the intuitive abilities of those around him? What can Creator tell us about this radio at the wedding event and how it all fits within the rules of engagement? Was the bride’s grandfather still in limbo?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm58 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwarz reported in the book, An Atheist in Heaven, that even after decades of research and seven books he wrote on the topic, he still struggled believing it all! He wrote, “In my case, being a well-trained skeptical thinker and well-educated disbeliever in the possibility of an afterlife, I had this strong, uncontrollable emotional reactive habit of automatically assuming that anyone who believed in life after death was naive, ignorant, stupid, brainwashed, prejudiced, delusional and/or crazy. This emotional reaction was clearly inconsistent with the emerging theory … and research. I experienced increasing conflict between what the emerging theory and research were teaching me versus my growing fear that if I accepted the theory and research, that maybe I was becoming ‘brainwashed’ by the theory and evidence, and I was even ‘losing my mind.’ I came to realize that I was like one of Pavlov’s classically conditioned dogs who automatically salivated to the sound of a bell. Dogs do not automatically salivate when they hear a bell ringing, and neither do we.” This confession by Dr. Schwartz is both revealing and disturbing. How could it possibly be that decades of research and validation could not successfully alter his emotions? How could he still harbor fear? Is all Type II Skepticism ultimately a FEAR reaction? Was the origin of Dr. Schwartz’s inexplicable emotions, even after decades, wholly originating with his deep subconscious? If so, it certainly reinforces Creator’s assertions that there is little short of divine intervention, via the Lightworker Healing Protocol and Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, that we can do to alter beliefs in the deep subconscious. What can Creator tell us about Dr. Schwartz’s struggle, and what lessons can we draw from it?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm21 views0 answers0 votesDr. Gary Schwartz provided another deeply mysterious observation about himself in the book. He wrote, “It is now Alice in Wonderland time. For many people, it is having … direct personal experiences which leads us to change our minds. However, if a phenomenon is novel, challenging, and especially if it is ‘seemingly unbelievable,’ then having a direct personal experience with the phenomenon is often essential. And for certain phenomena, there is no substitute for experiencing it ourselves. … What I have discovered is that the more unbelievable events are replicated, the greater the level of disbelief one may experience. Often the so-called boggle factor does not decrease with replication, it actually increases. This increased disbelief is not rational; it is emotional. Replication and validation are cornerstones of the scientific method. On the one hand, with each replication we are more convinced that the phenomenon is real, and yet simultaneously the phenomenon feels more unbelievable and seemingly impossible. If any single ‘formally physical person’ illustrates this emotional boggle factor, it is Forry. As the empirical evidence accumulated, the case for Forry being alive and well became stronger and stronger, and yet simultaneously the evidence became more and more difficult to believe.” What is Creator’s perspective on this dilemma and conundrum?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm50 views0 answers0 votesThe rules of engagement are certainly there for a reason. But also, arguably, they can be one of the biggest obstacles there is for creating critically needed change in this world. As Creator has said repeatedly, saving humanity is a “Divine Level Problem.” Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the tools we need to both work within the rules of engagement but also overcome the obstacles they represent at the same time?ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • Divine Realm54 views0 answers0 votesIn a channeling about the Rules of Engagement, you told us: “The more people are elevated and put on a pedestal, even for lofty thinking that is in divine alignment, the more karmic consequences can develop from people less fortunate becoming discouraged and feeling increasingly disempowered and helpless. Because all humans are interlinked as part of a family, the more exalted one becomes, the more it reflects an imbalance that will lower others affected by the contrast in seeing themselves as inferior and believing this is so.” Is this why Jesus Christ washed the feet of his disciples?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers152 views0 answers0 votesWe have heard you explain many times that the divine realm is limited in how it can intervene in human affairs by the “Rules of Engagement.” Can you give us a tutorial to help people understand the specific rules and why they exist?ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • Divine Realm45 views0 answers0 votesWas use of the term “progressive” instead of “liberal,” promoted through mind control manipulation by the Extraterrestrial Alliance as a form of propaganda to make people believe that change represents desirable progress, always, when such is not the case? Doesn’t this condition us to overturn the past, even to abandon things that work?ClosedNicola asked 5 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control124 views0 answers0 votesIs the political left in America embracing the doctrine of Muslim anti-Semitism because the Extraterrestrial Alliance is imposing those beliefs with mind control manipulation?ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control277 views0 answers0 votesThe cofounder of Wikipedia has revealed a bombshell concerning long-running suspicions of US intelligence interference and manipulation of the world’s most well-known collaborative online encyclopedia. The site’s cocreator, Larry Sanger, spoke to journalist Glenn Greenwald on his “System Update” podcast, and outlined the known “information warfare” efforts of US intelligence, which have to some extent made Wikipedia a tool of “control” by the left-liberal Washington deep state. Sanger explained that the intelligence agencies “pay off the most influential people to push their agendas, which they’re already mostly in line with, or they just develop their own talent within the community, learn the Wikipedia game, and then push what they want to say with their own people.” “A great part of intelligence and information warfare is conducted online,” he added, and then specified: “on websites like Wikipedia.” For that reason along with others explored in the interview, Sanger calls it “the most biased encyclopedia” in history. He described that US intelligence manipulation of the immensely large platform and repository of information had been going on for more than a decade (Wikipedia was founded and appeared online in 2001).ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Extraterrestrial Mind Control295 views0 answers0 votesA viewer asks: “Was I Elijah and/or John the Baptist and/or Charles de Foucaud in other lifetimes?” What can we tell him?ClosedNicola asked 2 years ago • Reincarnation470 views0 answers0 votesIn the 1980s, wrestlers widely adopted gimmick names and bigger-than-life roles. So you ended up with a cast of misfit “superheroes” with names like Hulk Hogan, the Ultimate Warrior, and supervillains like The Undertaker and The Earthquake. They were presented as “god-like men” and had egos and arrogance to go along with the portrayal. It really seems that this is the kind of game the Anunnaki like to play, adopting “epic names” for themselves, and even changing them often. What can Creator tell us about the resemblance between the interlopers and human superheroes?ClosedNicola asked 3 years ago • Extraterrestrial Corruption of Human Institutions409 views0 answers0 votesConcetta Bertoldi, a professional psychic medium of some repute, wrote a book titled, “Do Dead People Watch You Shower? And Other Questions You’ve Been All but Dying to Ask a Medium.” This book appears to be a remarkable autobiography, and rare opportunity for non-mediums (most of humanity) to read what it’s like to have and live one’s life with these abilities. Not everything she shares in the book aligns with everything Creator has shared with us in the GetWisdom Project, but more so by omission than any statements and revelations that wildly conflict. Like the rest of us, she seems clearly limited by her beliefs in terms of what she can reliably access from the divine realm in terms of deeper truths, but when focused solely on interacting with the dead, and relaying messages from the dead, she appears to be in strong alignment. She referred to herself as, “Just your average Jersey girl who talks to the dead.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls382 views0 answers0 votesOne of the more fascinating revelations Concetta shared in her book was how her father, whose own father was a medium, told her, “If I didn’t want to hear Them, all I had to do was envision myself surrounded by the white light of God and simply say, ‘In the name of God, be gone.’ I couldn’t believe it was that easy, but it was. The voices went away. Completely. For four years.” To get the ability back, she had to expressly ask for it. “When I asked the ability to come back to me, it didn’t happen right away.” This seems to demonstrate that such abilities TRULY are a divine gift that can be refused. What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls404 views0 answers0 votesConcetta’s brother, Harold, died a horrific death from AIDS. Concetta wrote, “I had been talking to the dead almost all my life, but before, they were just spirits that I didn’t know, and to be honest, at times I found them to be nuisances! I didn’t always want to hear these voices, but now there was one voice in particular that I was desperate to hear, and it didn’t come.” He later told her, “Con, tell them. Tell the world what you hear. We need you to, and they need you on that side too.” Why was there a delay? Was her brother hinting at the reality of being in limbo, something Concetta fails to clearly outline in her book? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Channeling Pitfalls372 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola