DWQA Questions › Tag: human suffering
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “Once the interlopers leave, will we ever get enough healing to where we can talk to God directly WITHOUT a mediator such as a channeler or an intuitive person?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 46 minutes ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Will the future healing effort be focused on individuals working on their own healing? Or having healers do the work for others like it’s been up to now?” What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 51 minutes ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “When does the Law of Karma decide a karmic debt has been repaid? When the suffering has been equaled to that originally caused? Or when someone better understands where they went wrong?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 54 minutes ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “You have told me that my daughter and her son are Targeted Individuals. Lately, her son has gotten into the habit of lying to everyone about anything and everything. Is the reason for this simply more manipulation by the darkness to cause her more grief? I pray that this, among other things, will stop when the interlopers depart.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator, if we are subjected to self-limiting beliefs from interloper mind control, can you tell us if there are positive expanding beliefs we could suggest to ourselves to counter them? Beliefs like, “I am unlimited.” Could you give us an example or guide to picking them and how they could be implemented effectively?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
Regardless of medical history and a healthy current status, what percent of people would benefit significantly from getting a chronic viral cleanout by taking a 3-week daily dose of both ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, because some might be harboring viruses that will eventually cause a chronic illness?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
0 views0 answers0 votes
Is it safe to say that all who have been diagnosed with a malady included in our tables of chronic viral-caused diseases would benefit from taking a 3-week daily dosing with ivermectin plus hydroxychloroquine?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
With people undergoing a viral cleanout with dual administration of ivermectin plus hydroxychloroquine, in addition to our Antiviral Regimen, what percentage might experience a detox reaction that will be perceptible as overt symptoms of some kind?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
Can you give us a tutorial on what signs would be consistent with an unavoidable detoxing for the individual, how to differentiate it from a drug side effect, and how best to manage it to maintain safety while balancing the need to accomplish an effective and thorough viral cleanout?
ClosedNicola asked 1 hour ago • 
1 views0 answers0 votes
Once the 3-week dual administration of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine has been completed, how can the effectiveness of viral cleanout be determined? Will some people need a second 3-week round of treatment with these drugs to complete the task?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Elaine Pagels, a Professor of Religion at Princeton University, wrote a book called The Origins of Satan. She wrote: “In the Hebrew Bible, as in mainstream Judaism to this day, Satan never appears as Western Christendom has come to know him, as the leader of an ‘evil empire,’ an army of hostile spirits who make war on God and humankind alike.” She further writes, “In biblical sources, the Hebrew term the satan describes an adversarial role. Although Hebrew storytellers as early as the sixth century B.C.E. occasionally introduced a supernatural character whom they called the satan, what they meant was any one of the angels sent by God for the specific purpose of blocking or obstructing human activity.” We know Creator has said that a literal “Satan” does not exist, but is rather more of a literary composite figure. We know the fallen Archangel Lucifer is often thought of as “Satan,” but if indeed they are synonymous, why wouldn’t Creator just say that Satan was simply another name for Lucifer? How much of the crucifixion narrative can be directly attributed to Lucifer himself? Or is he given too much credit and we need to look beyond Lucifer for the leaders of the ‘evil empire’ as Professor Pagels characterized the real adversary in the crucifixion narrative? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Elaine Pagels wrote: “All of the New Testament gospels, with considerable variation, depict Jesus’ execution as the culmination of the struggle between good and evil – between God and Satan – that began at his baptism.” Some material has suggested that the baptism was not merely symbolic, but that a profound spiritual transformation took place during the baptism; that the old soul “Jesus of Nazareth” was replaced by the “Christ spirit,” and that after the baptism Jesus was essentially a “walk-in.” Other than his birth and temple visit as a twelve-year-old, there is virtually nothing in the Bible that tells us what he did between the ages of 12 and 30 when he essentially began his ministry following his baptism. What can Creator tell us about the significance of his baptism by John the Baptist, and is there anything important to know about his years spent prior to that? Some sources suggest he was in India for much of that time period. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Pagels wrote, “The stark events of Jesus’ life and death cannot be understood, he (the Gospel of Mark author) suggests, apart from the clash of supernatural forces that Mark sees being played out on earth in Jesus’ lifetime. Mark intends to tell the story of Jesus in terms of its hidden, deeper dynamics – to tell it, so to speak, from God’s point of view. What happened Mark says, is this: ‘Jesus of Nazareth, after his baptism, was coming out of the water of the Jordon River when “he saw the heavens torn apart and the spirit descending like a dove on him” and heard a voice speaking to him from heaven. God’s power anointed Jesus to challenge the forces of evil that now dominate the world, and drove him into direct conflict with those forces.'” Following the baptism, the mysterious narrative describes him immediately being “driven” into the wilderness, and he was in the wilderness forty days being tempted by Satan. Given that Creator has said Satan is a composite figure only, what REALLY took place in the desert during those forty days? How would Creator today characterize the adversary that Jesus struggled with and against, and what was the nature of that struggle? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Pagels wrote, “Mark suggests that Jesus recognizes that the leaders who oppose him are energized by unseen forces.” Given the extraordinary powers Jesus possessed, he would almost certainly know who those unseen forces were. Today we know from Creator’s words that it is Anunnaki psychics interacting with humans directly, Anunnaki psychics directing lost soul Anunnaki spirits to attack humans in hit-and-run style encounters, while also instructing the Anunnaki lost soul spirits to enlist and command the fallen angelic spirit meddlers to attack and attach themselves and even directly possess human beings. Jesus is said to have driven seven demonic spirits out of Mary Magdalene—one for each of her seven major chakras. Was Jesus aware at that time that he was going against a galactic empire of extraterrestrials with mastery of time and space? Creator did say the Bible was primarily a whistleblowing document on the extraterrestrial problem. Jesus clearly knew that back in the light. Was his struggle in the desert a coming to terms with remembrance of what he was really up against, what he needed to do, and how it would likely play out? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
The widespread narrative is, of course, that the Romans crucified an innocent man. But innocent of what? Because, if anything, Jesus was extraordinarily politically incorrect. Dr. Pagels wrote, “The astonished crowds recognize that Jesus possesses a special authority, direct access to God’s power. … the scribes immediately took offense at what they considered his usurpation of divine authority. By pronouncing forgiveness, Jesus claims the right to speak for God – a claim that, Mark says, angers the scribes: ‘Why does this man speak this way? It is blasphemy! Who can forgive sins but God alone? Instead of fasting, like other devout Jews, Jesus ate and drank freely. And instead of scrupulously observing Sabbath laws, Jesus excused his disciples when they broke them. Claiming divine and royal power while simultaneously violating the purity laws, Jesus, at the beginning of his public activity, outrages virtually every party among his contemporaries, from the disciples of John the Baptist to the scribes and Pharisees.'” We are faced with the conundrum of Jesus “speaking truth to power.” The hazards of which are so visibly and starkly apparent from human history, that his eventual crucifixion was not only NOT a surprise but, in fact, an almost near certainty. Anyone wishing to follow his example and engage in speaking “truth to power,” as he did, is not likely to avoid a similar life-threatening fate. What lessons are we to best derive from this? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 2 hours ago • 
2 views0 answers0 votes
123…171Next »
Ask Question