DWQA Questions › Tag: lies
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
CNN reported: “President Donald Trump on Thursday vowed to begin testing US nuclear weapons ‘on an equal basis’ with Russia and China, heralding a potentially major shift in decades of US policy at a time of growing tensions between the world’s nuclear-armed superpowers…In a post on social media Trump said, ‘…Because of other countries’ testing programs, I have instructed the Department of War to start testing our Nuclear Weapons on an equal basis. That process will begin immediately,’ Trump said.” Some view this as sabre rattling, others as diplomacy through taking a tough stance as in “Peace Through Strength.” Is there an underlying purpose in terms of the alien agenda?
ClosedNicola asked 4 weeks ago • 
104 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Through the NDE of Tyler Morrison, Creator verified the legitimacy of Jesus’s message of warning about Elon Musk’s Neuralink implants that will be rolled out and, through mind control, people will be jumping over each other to get one, and for those that don’t get them they’ll be blacklisted, have their power turned off, etc. This dream was in 2023. Is this still planned to move forward with this kind of “do or die” veracity? Jesus said this will specifically target the younger generations. Having two teenagers myself, I will add more intention in my prayers and LHP-DSMR sessions if this is deemed necessary.” What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 month ago • 
68 views0 answers0 votes
The famous quote about the effectiveness of telling lies, from Nazi propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, has a second part that is perhaps a clue to a deeper truth: “If you repeat a lie often enough, people will believe it,” then Goebbels continues, “And you will even come to believe it yourself!” Is that reflecting his personal witnessing of alien mind control without realizing its sinister reach and power to manipulate human beliefs?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
192 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
102 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
106 views0 answers0 votes
Elon Musk’s Neuralink chip is promoted as a useful medical technology for people with a disability to regain a way for the mind to control the body. Is it also a future danger in being a mind-capture technology because it can be high-jacked by extraterrestrial technology to manipulate the mind and thoughts of people carrying that brain chip?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
220 views0 answers0 votes
Is the video of Tyler James Morrison, a 14-year-old who says he had a near-death experience and spoke to Jesus in 2023, a true and accurate account? Did Jesus truly warn him about Elon Musk’s Neuralink chip, that it was a sinister mind-capture technology to be avoided? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
148 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “You have told me that my daughter and her son are Targeted Individuals. Lately, her son has gotten into the habit of lying to everyone about anything and everything. Is the reason for this simply more manipulation by the darkness to cause her more grief? I pray that this, among other things, will stop when the interlopers depart.” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
283 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Humanity seems to grapple with a chronic, irrational, inexplicable, and destructive shame around sexuality. What is the primary cause? Is it due to ancient interloper programming and ongoing mind control to diminish, self-alienate, and weaken humanity?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
277 views0 answers0 votes
It’s interesting to note that the iconic “snake oil salesman” never had a storefront, like a pharmacy, but instead pulled into the town square with his wagon and hawked his magical products directly to the crowds, and then often “hightailed it” to the next town before the truth of his products became more widely known. Google defined snake oil salesmen as those who deceived people in order to get money from them. The successful ones were highly persuasive people. When one has such ability, it seems so puzzling that such a person could not find a “legitimate” avenue in which to practice those skills and be successful without all the ignominy. Good salespeople are in demand everywhere and for everything—why resort to fraud? What can Creator tell us about exploiting the masterful use of persuasion to willfully engage in fraud?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
344 views0 answers0 votes
When one does a study of some of the most effective salespeople, one often encounters a mixed bag of ethically questionable tactics. One extremely successful car salesman would sit down with a phone book, call people and tell them their new car was ready for pickup. When people inevitably said, “I didn’t order a car,” he would profusely apologize and then immediately segue into asking them if they were at all in the market for a new car. With this approach, he made a fortune and set the world record at the time for most non-fleet sales made by a car salesman “one customer at a time.” Now to his credit, he was extremely likable, attentive, thorough, and did great customer service, sent birthday cards to his customers, etc. Nevertheless, a lot of his success was predicated on a lie and deception. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
351 views0 answers0 votes
In reference to the above car salesman’s success, he was successful because he was good at “cold calling” which most people have a deep aversion to. Cold calling is one of the most obvious breaches of the “Golden Rule” there is. Almost everyone HATES getting cold calls, and yet most successful salespeople will assert that you need to do it in order to be successful. Brian remembers one “boiler room” telephone canvasser who bragged how she abused anyone cold calling her but had no problem doing cold calling for a living. The stark hypocrisy was dramatic and utterly remorseless and unapologetic. She literally thought it was “hilarious” and laughed about it. Brian found it disturbing, to say the least. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
431 views0 answers0 votes
Cold calling works precisely because so many people have an aversion to doing it. That alone makes it a successful strategy for those who can bring themselves to do it. Brian did sales in the late 80s and struggled with this dilemma. A rule of thumb is it takes 10 calls to get a lead, 10 leads to get an appointment, and 10 appointments to get a sale. Brian demonstrated to himself that, indeed, the formula works and managed to get a house listing as a result. But rather than being encouraged by his success, he was so overcome with guilt about disturbing people eating dinner that he eventually abandoned sales as a career altogether. Cold calling cannot work if everyone does it. Everyone’s phone would ring all day long and it would be utterly chaotic and untenable. There is the idea that, if “everyone” can’t, then maybe no one “should?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
366 views0 answers0 votes
Another successful sales guru made a fortune selling heavy stainless steel cookware door to door. (A direct form of cold calling that predates the telephone). He frequently recounted one sale he made where the woman initially slammed the front door on him and, in response, he went around to the back door to apologize for knocking on the front door. He was so charming and disarming, that the woman felt bad about mistreating him and consented to listening to his presentation as a way to make amends. She ended up buying the very expensive cookware he was selling. We are confronted with the dilemma of his apology being “insincere,” because he certainly felt no remorse about knocking on her front door at all, much less her back door after she made it clear she didn’t want to interact with him. What is Creator’s perspective on this anecdote, and what positive and negative divine lessons can we learn from it?
ClosedNicola asked 10 months ago • 
351 views0 answers0 votes
123…8Next »
Ask Question