DWQA Questions › Tag: life lessonsFilter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnansweredSort byViewsAnswersVotesJoan’s fortunes changed after the king’s coronation. Was her mission life essentially fulfilled at that point? During her assault on Paris, she rallied her troops promising them they would be inside the Paris walls that evening. A crossbow bolt ripped through her leg. She did not stop insisting that the city would be won as she was dragged from the ditch and carried to safety. What she didn’t know was the king had made treaties with his enemies to temporarily end hostilities for the winter, taking matters into his own hands and against Joan’s wishes and proclamations. Castor wrote, “The great theologian Gerson had foreseen this very problem. The ‘party having justice on its side,’ he had concluded after the triumph at Orleans, must take care not to render the help of heaven useless through disbelief or ingratitude, ‘for God changes His sentence as a result of a change in merit,’ he wrote, ‘even if he does not change His counsel.'” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers452 views0 answers0 votesJoan’s fortunes went from bad to worse when she was captured by enemy forces. The divine favor on full display before the king’s coronation was now seemingly missing entirely. A campaign of her own planning was her undoing. Was this plan the result of conferring with her inner guidance and getting their direction, or her simply using her own creativity? Did she go against divine advice? Or was this disaster fully karmic? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers514 views0 answers0 votesJoan claimed that her voices, her divine counsel, assured her that she would be set free from captivity. Yet that never happened, and she was condemned and burned at the stake. Did her voices say that, knowing that “free” meant being back in heaven, versus being literally released physically? If so, how was this not a kind of divine “white lie” or “lie of omission” if Joan understood it to mean release from physical captivity rather than death? It seems understandable that the voices were attempting to comfort her and prevent her from deeply despairing. Was her martyrdom part of her mission plan, or simply a consequence of too many variables to successfully avoid? What can Creator tell us?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers519 views0 answers0 votesCastor wrote, “But neither could he (the newly coronated King of France) agree with the late Jean Gerson, that if the Maid faltered, the blame might lie with the inadequacies of those around her. Instead, the only possible conclusion was that she had overreached herself.” What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers431 views0 answers0 votesIt seems that Joan’s mission life was in fact a divine chess match with the interlopers. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the tools needed to bring this chess match to end, in favor of humanity, once and for all?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Divinely Inspired Messengers440 views0 answers0 votesWe have learned that some skills, muscle memory, and other proclivities we call natural talent, can be recorded in the akashic records, and re-introduced into the cellular consciousness of a new body in a new incarnation. This is how natural talent can be carried over from lifetime to lifetime. What about the ego? Is it also recorded in the akashic records and re-introduced in some fashion to a new incarnation? Is it, like karma and physical talent, left behind when one becomes a light being but re acquired upon a new incarnation (so the incarnating soul can essentially pick up where they left off)? Is the ego truly left behind when the departing consciousness enters the light and is it one of the big reasons there is more wisdom and clarity as light beings? Or is the ego of a particular lifetime utterly lost upon transition, and new incarnations start off with an essentially blank ego?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption492 views0 answers0 votesCreator has said that the angels have egos. It would be assumed then that light beings also have egos of some sort. Is there a difference between the ego of a physical incarnation, and the ego of a light being?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption460 views0 answers0 votesThe ego does not appear to be brain-dependent, as lost soul spirits, when encountered by human victims and healers and psychics, seem to display lots of functioning ego characteristics. Can Creator comment on the ego’s reliance or lack of reliance on the physical brain?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption453 views0 answers0 votesAt what age does the ego really take hold in a new incarnation? What can parents and caregivers do to help foster the healthy development of their child’s ego?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption539 views0 answers0 votesOver-inflated egos and the Dunning-Kruger effect seem to represent pressing healing needs for much of humanity. Can Creator share how Empowered Prayer and the Lightworker Healing Protocol are the best tools for bringing about the highest and best form of healing?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Human Corruption509 views0 answers0 votesCollin’s online Dictionary defines normal as: “Something that is usual and ordinary, and is what people expect.” Yourdictionary.com defines it as: “Conforming to an accepted, usual, or typical form, model, or pattern.” Most people at some point in their life strive to be normal, and of course, some strive not to be. Many who strive not to be, do so because they earlier failed in their attempts to be and appear normal. For some, being normal is relatively easy, for others it’s a struggle, and for a few, impossible. For some, appearing normal is a major accomplishment, and for others, a necessary nuisance. People are habitual creatures. Norms should reflect successful behavior patterns that stand the test of time. But when “accepted norms” change rapidly, that should be a clue that something is wrong. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs499 views0 answers0 votesA woman reports a conversation with her ex-husband, a successful public personality and a household name in his country. She was trying to convince him that the mainstream media often told lies and created fictional narratives designed to manipulate people into acting and believing things they would not do or believe ordinarily. His response was “if we can’t trust the mainstream media, who can we trust?” Being a highly successful and duly rewarded public figure, he had a lot to lose if he challenged the narrative. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs461 views0 answers0 votesOne aspect of being normal is believing in the common good, that the two are somehow synonymous in many if not most people’s minds. If one simply strives to be normal, one will automatically and simultaneously be considered to be a good person. And to challenge a person’s normality is to simultaneously challenge their goodness. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs472 views0 answers0 votesWhat does Creator think of the idea of root beliefs representing beliefs that create the very foundations of a person’s personal worldview? Such a root belief would be “normal is good.” And from this one belief, an entire superstructure of beliefs about proper behavior, proper ideas, proper appearance, and, most problematic of all, proper politics is manifested. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs497 views0 answers0 votesA root belief is a belief that will be protected at all costs. Even, and especially, in the face of conflicting evidence to the contrary. For instance, if one held the root belief that “democracy is good,” then anything that challenges their notion of democracy is bad. So if a democratically elected leader bends or breaks the rules, but does so to protect democracy, then the behavior is justified. Even if the actions taken are decisively non-democratic. What is Creator’s perspective?ClosedNicola asked 4 years ago • Limiting Beliefs431 views0 answers0 votes
Nicola