DWQA Questions › Tag: life mission
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
Arriving at an advanced understanding of karma is not easy. We assume that everything in this universe begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Recognizing there are other universes with their own Creators, and even levels of consciousness above Creator, we assume that the Law of Karma in this universe also begins and ends with the Creator of this universe. Is that true? We’ve heard Creator say that even Creator is subject to the Law of Karma. Is that just holding oneself to one’s own standards, or is Creator literally accountable to those layers of consciousness above Creator? Who keeps Creator accountable? There is a strong skepticism surrounding self-policing and holding oneself accountable as the only means of law enforcement. What can Creator tell us about where Creator’s karma begins and ends?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
We know that creation of our universe did not just happen once, that there were universes that came and went before this one. The Hindus have the word “kalpa” to describe one universal cycle. And there have been innumerable past kalpas. We’ve learned that many, if not all, of these past universes had “Free Will Projects” determining their longevity and ultimate fate. We’ve learned that between universes and during the planning for the next one, that changes to the Law (or Laws) of Karma are explored, debated, and ultimately settled upon. Lessons from past kalpas are applied, and hypothetical untried approaches are also explored and perhaps installed. Is this the only time that the Laws of Karma can be adjusted, or can the Laws of Karma be adjusted and calibrated at any time? And if so, by “whom?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
51 views0 answers0 votes
The Hindus recognize the existence of “Lords of Karma.” Are there such beings? If not, is that a corruption? If they exist, what exactly is their role? Is their job to determine the Laws of Karma themselves, to enforce the laws, and to come up with creative solutions to meet the implementation/enforcement needs determined by karma? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
We have learned that a great many noxious and unpleasant species of plants and animals have been created throughout the Milky Way Galaxy and eventually imported to Earth by the extraterrestrials to be a scourge to humanity. We’ve learned that the raccoon is native to the Anunnaki planet, Nibiru, and was created to be a karmic response to their predatory behavior. Given the almost 5 billion year existence of the Anunnaki civilization, approximately how long ago was the raccoon created? We know the raccoon steals, fouls, and lays waste to provisions and dwellings of sentient beings. Even with modern control methods, they are difficult to manage. Who designed the raccoon—Creator, the Lords of Karma, or Karma itself? Can Creator briefly summarize exactly what Anunnaki transgressions necessitated the need for the raccoon? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
We know the dog and cat have been repurposed from predatory wild animals to become loving domestic companions while retaining some features of their predatory heritage. The horse, on the other hand, does not appear to be repurposed, but, in fact, purposefully designed for both Earth’s ecosystem and to be a direct helper companion to humanity. Was it designed for the first seeding of humanity and survived since then? Or was it introduced (or re-introduced) before the second seeding? Was it truly designed for Earth, or was the design borrowed from other worlds? Or was the horse seeded by the same coalition that seeded the second round of humans? What can Creator tell us about the Earth history, initial creation history, and karmic history of the horse?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
48 views0 answers0 votes
We know Earth was created to be a loving nest for humanity, initially free of noxious species of plants and animals. We know that all or perhaps nearly all such species are imports. That said, while humanity retains a great deal of its divine heritage, it is, in fact, not perfect. It is conceivable that humanity has performed collective karmic transgressions that might be best met with the creation and introduction of some form of noxious plant or animal species. Is there even a single example of that happening? If not, could some of the explanation be that we have simply not been around long enough (just two hundred thousand years or so) to warrant a unique species response to a karmic dilemma?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
37 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karma of the individual, and then there is group karma. Noxious species are clearly designed to be a response to group karma involving innumerable individuals and even countless generations. As such, it becomes a kind of permanent feature of the environment and landscape. And then there is the problem of a solution designed for one group, being weaponized and used to ravage other groups and planets that don’t deserve such exposure and infestation. While true, that it’s the actions of the extraterrestrials spreading such species that are the cause, what about the involvement of the Creator or creators of the species itself? Does Creator and/or the creative team, share any karmic responsibility? If so, how is that handled?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
20 views0 answers0 votes
Creator is concerned with the spiritual growth of the individual (and even species) but karma looks geared to not be at all concerned with that agenda. Rather, it simply responds to energy perturbations in a literal tit-for-tat fashion. Karma is not concerned either, about a mission life underway; and if there is an opportunity to introduce a karmic response, it will simply do so in a kind of mechanical, automatic way. Does any cancellation or attenuation necessitate a divine intervention? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
40 views0 answers0 votes
There is the karmic problem of returning a response to a perpetrator with a dramatically different makeup from the initial victim triggering the karmic debt. For instance, the same shove delivered to one individual is an annoyance but breaks the bones of someone frail. How would this debt be handled? Does karma wait for the perpetrator to be born frail? But even if frail, a psychopathic personality might absorb such a shove very differently than the initial victim, even if the broken bones are the same or similar. Then there is the dilemma of the first victim having a karmic recurrence of the shove themselves. So do we have both the perpetrator and victim getting the SAME karmic response? OR does the perpetrator simply return as another perpetrator and the victim as well, to again be a victim? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
27 views0 answers0 votes
Regardless of the workings of karma itself, we have learned that divine intervention is the means to heal, avoid, and/or reduce and attenuate karmic debts and dilemmas. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Memory Reset, and Divine Life Support bring about the desired divine intervention to heal karmic difficulties?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
38 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I wonder if we have fully addressed the concept of God’s grace. The term was used often in my Catholic youth but I’m not sure if I know what it is, or if such an independent energy exists. Is God’s grace another term for love and light? Is it something that flows automatically when healing occurs? Is it a human contrived concept to explain why others have comforts that you do not, to keep you striving? Is it a by-product of healing or a bonus? Is it the secret ingredient, or rocket fuel that hasn’t occurred to us to request by name? If it is something that can be requested, maybe now’s the time. What is Creator’s perspective on this?”
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
100 views0 answers0 votes
Perhaps one of the biggest problems facing humanity is “engineered complacency.” What is the fundamental state of human curiosity when suppressed by mind control manipulation? Is the curiosity restrained or actually destroyed? Because if merely restrained, then once the mind control tapers off or ceases altogether, will curiosity EXPLODE within the masses of humanity? Or will there be something akin to cellular memory working that will keep a kind of learned self-suppression going even when the overt mind control comes to an end? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
94 views0 answers0 votes
We know the deep subconscious is the principal repository of hidden and not consciously recognized beliefs. How much is conscious belief built on a substrate of unconscious beliefs? When someone says, “I am an Atheist,” as an expression of their belief that God does not exist, can such a conscious belief survive if Deep Subconscious Memory Reset changed the underlying unconscious beliefs underpinning the conscious ones? Can the divine even change the underlying beliefs if the conscious mind has embraced a summation or capstone of the underlying beliefs?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
86 views0 answers0 votes
We know the divine cannot act unilaterally to change beliefs in the deep subconscious. Can healing requests by third parties give the divine the needed license it needs to make belief changes, even, and in spite of, firmly held conscious beliefs of the individual client, and if so, how can that be ethical?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
93 views0 answers0 votes
Would the conscious manifestation of subconscious belief changes be the increasing experience of doubt, and perhaps even the tenuous emergence of guilt feelings? Is sudden or even creeping doubt the erosion of conscious belief on account of the supporting unconscious beliefs changing? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
76 views0 answers0 votes
123…6Next »