DWQA Questions › Tag: limbo
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
In the book Thirty Years Among the Dead by Dr. Carl Wickland, Mrs. Wickland channeled her deceased childhood friend, Mrs. Lacklund, shortly after she passed. Mrs. Lacklund said, “Insanity is nothing but obsession by spirits who are sent to the spirit side of life without understanding the truth of God.” Is it really true that insanity is “NOTHING BUT” obsession by spirits? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
69 views0 answers0 votes
Also in the book Thirty Years Among the Dead by Dr. Carl Wickland, the experience of a sensitive young man is shared. This young man had established himself in business with his father when one morning, he rose early and left home. He just up and vanished. The distraught parents reached out to Dr. Wickland for help. Wickland’s team prayed that the boy “should have no rest until he wrote his parents.” The following morning, he wrote to them, saying he was in the Navy and would be gone for several years. Dr. Wickland’s team did more prayer/concentration work, and the spirit of a deceased sailor longing to return to the sea was channeled by Mrs. Wickland. The spirit reported that “lots of people brought me here” to be channeled by Mrs. Wickland. Can Creator share with us why the boy was so vulnerable to this kind of takeover? The sailor spirit was not particularly evil, but was self-centered and very focused on returning to sea. It was said that the boy in the question above was “sensitive to spirit influence.” Aren’t we ALL? To one degree or another? What was it about the boy, and all of us for that matter, that make us “sensitive” to spirit influence versus “not sensitive” or at least “not so sensitive?” What percentage of the human population has had a takeover as this boy experienced? Due to the effective action, from a considerable distance, of the boy’s parents, Dr. Wickland and his team, including his gifted medium wife, the boy was freed from the spirit and eventually reunited with his family. The family was even successful in arranging an early discharge from the Navy—something not at all easy to accomplish. How does this distance release accomplished through prayer show us how the Lightworker Healing Protocol works to accomplish similar outcomes? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Wickland, being a practicing psychiatrist, was able to use electroshock treatments with his patients. These treatments had the effect of driving spirit attachments out of the victim’s aura, where awaiting “helper” spirits would “assist” this spirit over to Mrs. Wickland’s aura, where they could enter and take temporary control of Mrs. Wickland and therefore speak to Dr. Wickland directly. Wickland would then engage the spirit in direct conversation and attempt to explain to that spirit what had happened to them, and how better to comport themselves and get back on a more progressive spiritual path. He was successful more often than not, but occasionally, truly recalcitrant spirits were simply sent back to “the outer darkness.” Once again, is this a psychokinetic energy contest where the spirit in question is “overpowered” energetically and essentially pushed/forced back aggressively to the “holding place” and away from the victim? Does this all conform to the rules of engagement, or were some of the “helper spirits” taking matters into their own hands in acting like security guards with unruly spirits? When using the Lightworker Healing Protocol, unlike Dr. Wickland, we practitioners are not part of communicating/negotiating with spirit attachments. Do we rather empower the “spirit guides and guardians” to do this with our requests? What happens when the attachment won’t listen and cooperate? Are they sent back to the “holding place?” Is electroshock therapy equally effective against both lost soul human spirits as well as fallen angelic spirit meddlers? Either way, when done without knowledge and understanding, at best, it creates a temporary vacancy, and the attaching spirits simply return once again. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
73 views0 answers0 votes
Electroshock therapy has been widely viewed and labeled as “barbaric.” Yet ironically, it is still in use today. The difference is, now the patient is put under anesthesia before the shocks are administered. But we also know that anesthesia itself makes the recipient MORE PRONE to acquiring spirit attachments! So you drive them out with electroshock, but make it easier than ever for ejected attachments to return with spirit defenses weakened by anesthesia? What can Creator tell us about the limited usefulness of electroshock therapy, why it works “at all,” and how anesthesia makes us more vulnerable to spirit attachments and, even in extreme cases, obsession and even possession? Is there anything equivalent to electroshock that the divine administers when we ask in the protocol to “net all spirits within and around my clients?” Is this a kind of psychokinetic power as opposed to the electricity used in electroshock? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
63 views0 answers0 votes
A methodist minister who was a member of Dr. Wickland’s “team” when alive, channeled through Mrs. Wickland shortly after his passing. He had this to say, “… There is nothing which can harm you if you are not afraid. Fear is what we must avoid; we must develop power. When you develop fear you create conditions of fear around you. You should develop within yourself the power of God, the power to conquer, the power of Love. Then you will conquer, no matter what comes.” He says further, “If you are troubled by obsession, say to yourself: ‘I am master, and nobody else can interfere.’ When you do that you will be free. Do not think of the other one (obsessing spirit) who is trying to bother you. Send out a kind thought to him. Do not send out thoughts of evil because they only hinder your own self. They create more thoughts of anger and you will not have gained anything. Develop within yourself power and strength to conquer.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
65 views0 answers0 votes
It was said in Dr. Wickland’s book that spirits attached to humans can have their OWN set of attachments! How many layers deep can this go? Another thing mentioned was the danger of acquiring attachments that had committed suicide. Oftentimes, these spirits don’t know they were actually successful with their own physical suicide, and don’t even realize they are now “dead” and attached to another human being! As such, they may think their suicide attempt was actually unsuccessful, and in so thinking, will unknowingly transmit their determination to their host and influence them negatively, and in some cases even force them to kill themselves. This is especially the case if the suicidal spirit was an atheist and believed they would simply cease to exist upon the death of the body. In this way, they could be responsible for many suicides of victims before they finally “figure things out” and realize there is no escape from “themselves” in death. Furthermore, many drugs warn of “suicidal thoughts” as a possible adverse side effect. Suicidal thoughts come from CONSCIOUSNESS, not “chemistry.” Do the drugs weaken our spiritual (and even physical) defenses and help attract both suicidal spirits as well as spirit meddlers who like to encourage self-destruction? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
67 views0 answers0 votes
Wikipedia had this to say about The Rosenhan Experiment, conducted by psychologist David L. Rosenhan in the early 1970s, “(The Rosenhan Experiments) investigated the validity of psychiatric diagnoses by examining how mental health professionals identified mental illness. In this controversial study, eight individuals without any psychiatric history feigned auditory hallucinations to gain admission to twelve different mental hospitals across the United States. Despite providing truthful information about their lives and claiming to no longer hear voices, all participants were diagnosed with severe mental disorders, primarily schizophrenia, and remained hospitalized for an average of nineteen days. The study highlighted significant issues within psychiatric institutions, such as the staff’s limited interaction with patients and their tendency to misinterpret normal behavior as symptomatic of mental illness. All but one were released only after agreeing to a mental illness diagnosis and medication, which they flushed down the toilet.” In 1976, a young German woman named Anneliese Michel died after 67 Catholic Exorcisms. The concluded cause of death by the authorities was starvation. Anneliese didn’t think the doctors knew what they were doing, and she knew if she shared too much with them, she would end up in the insane asylum. Her parents and two priests were later convicted of negligent homicide for not turning her over to the state institution, where she would have been force-fed and medicated. What is Creator’s perspective on the “conflict” between the secular and religious responses to obsession, possession, and its symptoms? Were the parents and priests “wrong” in not enlisting the help of secular doctors? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
Anthropologist Felicitas Goodman wrote The Exorcism of Anneliese Michel and the book How About Demons? Possession and Exorcism in the Modern World. Dr. Goodman was convinced that Anneliese was a victim of demonic possession, most likely brought about by a curse rumored to be placed on Anneliese prior to birth solicited and paid for by a woman jealous of Anneliese’s mother. Goodman said that in her experience, nearly all these kinds of possessions were the result of a powerful curse placed by powerful practitioners of the dark arts. Anneliese was a gentle, kind, intelligent, thoughtful individual who seemed like the last person on Earth to “deserve” what happened to her. So much so, in fact, that she and her family came to believe that her plight and suffering were somehow sacrificial and for the benefit of others. Because otherwise, it didn’t make sense to them. Dr. Goodman noted that in Haiti, it is believed that an exorcism will succeed only if the exorcist is more powerful than the one placing the curse. Was this the case with Anneliese as well? Did the exorcisms fail, and Anneliese died because the priests were not as “powerful” as the one who placed the curse? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
56 views0 answers0 votes
The 67 Catholic Exorcisms said by the two priests involved for Anneliese brought at best temporary relief, but in the end were considered a failure due to her unanticipated and tragic death at just 23 years old. Goodman wrote: “Exorcism is basically designed to help the afflicted person to gain ritual control over the molesting entities … Unruly spirits (also) need to and indeed can be trained. Without ritual intervention, the undoing of such a pattern is extremely difficult, especially so if the alter is evil or, in religious terms, if the possessing entity has demonic powers. … It is the only strategy used cross-culturally against demonic possession, and in all instances where it is allowed to work without interference, it is eminently successful. … The worst situation in the West is the one involving demonic possession. Those afflicted by it need help. Exorcism works, other strategies do not, yet their diagnosis and treatment are determined not by what works but by the prevailing attitudes, the paradigm concerning the nature of reality. The position is so ingrained that arguments that religious experience is accompanied by measurable and recordable physiological changes are totally ignored. Finally, it should be noted that Mary, the mother of Jesus, reportedly told Anneliese in a vision she had months in advance that her ordeal would be over on the day she actually died.” What is the divine perspective on this outcome, and were the exorcisms “successful” according to the divine? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Spirit obsession and possession are bigger problems than most people realize. It’s a problem that spans both life and death, and affects the living and the dead in profound and nearly equal measure. Can Creator share with us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best and most effective means to resolve this vexing problem from BOTH sides of the physical and post-physical divide?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
Can it be said perhaps that the BIG difference between heaven and hell, so to speak, or the lower astral versus the higher etheric, is that in the higher etheric using psychokinetic force to manipulate another spirit is a HUGE NO-NO. Is this the centerpiece of the War in Heaven, where benevolent angels expelled those who refused to refrain from using their greater personal psychokinetic force advantage for selfish motives and influence over those lesser endowed or even evolved? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
52 views0 answers0 votes
Creator has often stated that the extraterrestrial lost soul spirits frequently bully the spirit meddlers, aka fallen angelics. This would seem to suggest the reason for this is that the ET lost soul (or simply departed ET) spirits have MUCH greater levels of psychical energy or psychokinetic force than the spirit meddlers, perhaps even exponentially so. If so, WHY would that be the case? Does some of it have to do with their extremely long physical lifespans (in the case of the Anunnaki) as well as the likely emphasis on developing greater and greater levels of individual psychokinetic power, which they need to survive and especially to thrive in their predatory societies—societies where the STRONGEST and most RUTHLESS are the ones who make it to the top of the power hierarchies? Is this yet another reason why partnership with the divine is critical? Because when it comes to direct confrontation, such as depicted when the Jedi battle the Sith in Star Wars, we humans don’t stand “a chance in hell” versus the ETs. We lack the necessary psychokinetic force (much less the technology and other factors) to confront them directly, and furthermore, we will never even get the opportunity to develop it sufficiently. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
47 views0 answers0 votes
It would seem that the attainment of greater and greater levels of psychokinetic power can be achieved over many lifetimes, and that this might be a principal motive for why an Anunnaki would desire to return to such a repressive society. With each life lived in that environment, they may develop greater and greater levels of individual psychokinetic power that they can then wield and enjoy. Whereas, for humans, the motive to reincarnate would be BOTH development of psychokinetic power as well as, and perhaps more importantly, CHARACTER. It seems that ancient human religions focused more on developing psychokinetic power than they do now. Clearly, some of that is a direct result of extraterrestrial control over humans, but is it also because the divine itself has de-emphasized developing psychokinetic power, given the insurmountable disparity between humans and extraterrestrials? At this point in our history, focusing on psychokinetic power development is not just a waste of time, in fact, but profoundly dangerous to even pursue at all. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
64 views0 answers0 votes
In the book Thirty Years Among the Dead by Dr. Carl Wickland, the spirit “Dr. Root” channeled through Anna Wickland the following: “The spirit world is a counterpart of this (physical one) with one exception – here you are thrown together with every sort of person (good and bad), while there you cannot go anywhere unless you have understanding of where you are going.” He further channeled: “A spirit in ignorance cannot see an intelligent spirit.” This suggests CHARACTER is a far greater determinant of what you can see and not see than any other factor. Yet within the domain you land in spiritually, it will be psychokinetic power that will determine your ability to master THAT particular narrow environment. It makes sense that predatory characters end up in the outer darkness. But why should a nonpredatory spirit who merely succumbs to fear, sadness, and depression end up there as well so that the outer darkness contains bad characters and otherwise good characters with negative afflictions? How is it that they should end up in the same space, so to speak, while those good characters without (or significantly less) negative afflictions should end up in a safer and more welcoming and loving place surrounded by those with similar makeup and attainments? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
37 views0 answers0 votes
One of the things that makes the physical world “disturbing” for “sensitive souls,” as Creator once put it, is the violent relationship between predator and prey in nature. It seems unfair and heavily weighted on the side of the predator. The lower astral planes and the outer darkness mirror nature in that it is full of BOTH predators and prey, while the higher astral or etheric (or heaven) gets beyond that paradigm. We’re even told the Ascended Earth in humanity’s future will also be beyond that paradigm. Why is it that predator and prey end up together when the disparity between the two could be overwhelming, like a full-grown lion consuming a newborn antelope calf for lunch? Are the predator and prey there for the same or different life lessons? What do a fallen angelic and the hapless but nonpredatory human spirit in limbo it is preying on have in common in terms of developmental needs? Do predator and prey really have a similar makeup and similar development needs? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 weeks ago • 
53 views0 answers0 votes
123…28Next »
Ask Question