DWQA Questions › Tag: loneliness
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
A practitioner asks: “I’m finding that with the clarity that comes from the healing through the protocols, there are also a lot of feelings of shame, guilt and embarrassment about the past as well as a lot of “could haves,” “should haves,” and “would haves.” At the moment, I feel like I’m just reliving everything in my head and I’m finding it difficult to focus on the present moment and enjoying the healing changes that the protocols have brought about. Being mindful and communing with Creator helps but it’s difficult to do this at all times, especially when at work or busy. There’s constant fear and worry and fear of judgement from others about past mistakes even though, in the grand scheme of things, the mistakes I’ve made haven’t been that bad. I understand that I’m coming from a different starting point that makes me feel different from others and why I’ve often been isolated and alone, so I’m guessing that I’m lacking in the general life experience that others have to move on from past mistakes. I’d like to be as fighting fit as possible for what is to come in the days ahead without fear that my mind will be full of worry about things that don’t really matter. Can Creator offer advice on what to focus on as a healing need in the protocols to help with this, to strengthen soul attributes and change beliefs and programming to be able to deal with the past and move on from the leftover guilt and shame?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
46 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Can Creator offer advice or a tutorial on what to do and how to best manage the fear and doubt and regret in our minds while growing and becoming stronger from what we have experienced, especially with the revelations and changes, and hopefully healing, that is coming soon? As events come to pass, I imagine that a lot of people will be feeling similar to how I feel now.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 week ago • 
45 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Internet watchdog, factually.co, a trustworthy, reliable source of politically and ideologically independent research and reporting about people and events which are controversial? How corrupted might it be by the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co, reported the following about commentator Tucker Carlson making antisemitic statements to his followers: “Tucker Carlson has been repeatedly accused of antisemitism for a series of public statements and interviews spanning at least 2023–2025, including demeaning descriptions of Jewish individuals, platforming Holocaust minimizers and extremists, and promoting tropes about Jewish power and “replacement” that many groups label antisemitic [1] [2] [3]. Carlson and some defenders deny he is antisemitic, arguing he is critiquing Israel or elites rather than Jews as a group, while Jewish organizations, members of Congress and conservative institutions have publicly condemned specific remarks and guest choices [4] [2] [5].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on his part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
270 views0 answers0 votes
The Internet watchdog, factually.co-reported the following about Candace Owens making anti-Semitic statements to her followers: “Candace Owens has been repeatedly labeled anti-Semitic for a series of public comments and online posts that critics say recycle classic antisemitic tropes — including claims about Jewish control of media and finance, promotion of an antisemitic 19th century text, blood libel adjacencies, and conspiracy links between Jews and historical crimes — made across social media, livestreams, and her shows between 2022–2025 [1] [2] [3]. Those remarks prompted condemnations from Jewish advocacy groups, a break with some conservative institutions and allies, platform enforcement actions, and formal public backlash that frames the pattern as shifting from dog whistle rhetoric to more overt antisemitic conspiracy mongering [4] [5] [6].” What can Creator tell us about the reasons for this emerging behavior on her part?
ClosedNicola asked 2 months ago • 
197 views0 answers0 votes
What is the dark thing my client has seen flying around in her home four nights in a row now, and has her large guard dog cowering when he sees it? What needs to be done to remove it?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
269 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Creator has said that people must do all they can to overcome difficulties because this provides more intentional energy, and because if Creator helps too much, people do not develop responsibility and abilities. Is the LHP request for Creator to address self-limiting mindsets sufficient to maximize the effectiveness of people using self-help methods like journaling, mindfulness and breathing exercises, physical activity, positive social support, and cognitive reframing sufficient to optimally address common non-clinical emotional patterns such as shame, fear, regret, self-doubt, loneliness, procrastination, meaninglessness, etc? Would explicit prayers to heal these upsets be beneficial?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
188 views0 answers0 votes
A news report states: “Nearly a dozen violent assailants equipped with tactical gear and weapons attacked U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado, Texas, on July 4, shooting a local law enforcement officer in the process.” Is this just a spontaneous choice of those assailants coming together because of shared political beliefs, or is there a deeper influence involved behind the growing attacks on this branch of law enforcement?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
170 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “Here is a question I may have for you to ask Creator. On Sunday morning (June 22nd), I was woken up and noticed that there was a constant intercom buzzing of my building. I live on the ground floor, so I can always hear when people are buzzed in and out from my building. But this was constant. I went out to see and there was nobody, and there was nothing I could do about it. I had some coffee and then it came back around 9am-ish. But only for a few minutes. It hasn’t happened since. I was alone in my flat at the time. Was it something targeted at me? Or was it just a neighbor’s broken buzzer and then it stopped when they woke up, or was it something more interloper or divine?” What can we tell him?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
305 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer requested a session to help her issues: “1. Work. New management. Feel like I can’t do anything right. I’m being left out of key decisions and initiatives. Don’t know who I can trust. 2. Mind. Brain fog and memory issues. Making mistakes I would never make before. 3. Weight loss. No matter what I do, I can’t seem to lose weight. Lack of energy. Feel emotionally, spiritually, and physically drained. Not sleeping or dreaming like I used to. 4. Feel alone, mostly at work but don’t feel like I have a lot of friends to turn to.” Are any of her issues the result of chronic viral infection or targeting? What can be done to help her?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
145 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer writes: “I sent my client a healing prayer so that she can take a more active role in her healing.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 8 months ago • 
317 views0 answers0 votes
The recently deceased Stanford Emeritus Professor Dr. Philip Zimbardo wrote the book, The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. Dr. Zimbardo is famous for his 1971 “Stanford Prison Experiment” that he was compelled to abruptly terminate as it quickly got out of hand and turned into a dangerously oppressive and health-threatening situation for the experiments’ participants after only a week. In the experiment, the prison guards became overwhelmingly sadistically abusive and cruel, and the prisoners became shockingly powerless and submissive to the point of losing their objectivity and grip on reality and actually believing they were real prisoners and not just participants in an “experiment.” The findings of this experiment were deeply disturbing and shocking on many levels. Zimbardo wrote, “One of the dominant conclusions of the Stanford Prison Experiment is that the pervasive yet subtle power of a host of situational variables can dominate an individual’s will to resist.” He continued, “We see how a range of research participants … have come to conform, comply, obey, and be readily seduced into doing things they could not imagine doing when outside those situational force fields.” Can Creator tell us how this MOCK prison with randomly chosen guards and prisoners almost immediately took on the atmosphere and oppressiveness of some of the world’s worst prisons and concentration camps? Zimbardo wrote, “We were surprised that situational pressures could overcome most of these healthy young men so quickly and so extremely.” Is this widespread and disturbing proclivity, to quickly slip into either extreme perpetrator or extreme victim roles, an inherent flaw in the human makeup? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
415 views0 answers0 votes
Zimbardo wrote about the Rwandan genocide. The Holocaust Museum website gives this summary: “Under the cover of war, Hutu extremists launched their plans to destroy the entire Tutsi civilian population. Violence spread with lightning speed through the capital and into the rest of the country, and continued for roughly three months. Between 500,000 and one million people, mostly Tutsis, were slaughtered in 100 days. Hutu militias, backed, trained and equipped by Rwandan government forces, were responsible for the majority of the killing.” Zimbardo wrote: “A Hutu murderer said in an interview a decade later that ‘The worst thing about the massacre was killing my neighbor; we used to drink together, his cattle would graze my land. He was like a relative.'” Zimbardo wrote further, “The testimonies of these ordinary men – mostly farmers, active churchgoers and a former teacher – are chilling in their matter-of-fact, remorseless depiction of unimaginable cruelty. Their words force us to confront the unthinkable again and again: that human beings are capable of totally abandoning their humanity for a mindless ideology, to follow and then exceed the orders of charismatic authorities to destroy everyone they label as ‘The Enemy.'” Can Creator help us make sense of this sense-less event in recent human history?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
369 views0 answers0 votes
Dr. Stanley Milgram contrived and carried out a famous experiment on Blind Obedience to Authority. Google’s AI provided this summary: “In the experiment, participants were instructed to administer increasingly severe electric shocks to a learner (an actor) for incorrect answers. The study demonstrated that ordinary individuals are surprisingly willing to obey authority, even when those orders conflict with their own moral beliefs.” Zimbardo wrote: “In Milgram’s experiment, two of every three (65 percent) of the volunteers went all the way up to the maximum shock level of 450 volts. … The data clearly revealed the extreme pliability of human nature. Milgram was able to demonstrate that compliance rates could soar to over 90 percent of people continuing the 450-volt with the introduction of one crucial variable … Make the subject a member of a ‘teaching team,’ in which the job of pulling the lever is given to another person.” We want to think of the majority of humanity as good, but Milgram demonstrated rather conclusively that 9 out of 10 people can become, willingly, a party to unthinkable cruelty. Even to an authority that has no means to actually compel them. Can Creator tell us, how can this possibly be?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
257 views0 answers0 votes
Zimbardo characterized the Milgram Studies as “Creating Evil Traps for Good People.” Zimbardo extracted ten methods for this: 1. Create a contractual obligation. 2. Give a positive role or title like “teacher.” 3. Present basic rules that “must” be followed – even if vague. 4. Spin the agenda as “positive” – bad-tasting mouthwash “kills germs.” 5. Insist the authority is fully responsible for everything that happens. 6. Start with small acts of evil and work up from there. 7. Keep the amplification of evil so gradual as to hardly be noticeable. 8. Gradually change the nature of the authority from “just” to “unjust” and demanding and even irrational. 9. Make the exit costs high while allowing verbal dissent. And 10. Offer a “big lie” to justify everything. This is clearly a diabolically effective “stacked deck” that Milgram demonstrated works 90% of the time. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 11 months ago • 
328 views0 answers0 votes
123…10Next »
Ask Question