DWQA Questions › Tag: mainstream science
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
On April 7, 2025, an editorial in Scientific American’s Today in Science stated: “Yet another spate of devastating tornadoes struck last week in east Texas, Tennessee, and other southern and southeastern states. As we reported in 2023, tornado alley is shifting east, with more frequent and more intense twister touchdowns. The cause? You guessed it: climate change. Warmer and moister air rises, forming supercell storm clouds that fuel tornados.” How correct is this analysis?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
401 views0 answers0 votes
A preprint from a Cleveland Clinic study just reported, claimed not only that this year’s trivalent flu vaccine failed to show a protective effect, but those vaccinated had a 27%, significantly increased, likelihood of becoming ill. Was this the true outcome and reported accurately, or was the study flawed? What is most important for us to know?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
251 views0 answers0 votes
Among the 94% of physical illnesses that are of karmic origin, what percent of these have cellular memory complications that will delay divine healing as a consequence of free will, even of the bodymind at a cellular level?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
454 views0 answers0 votes
What percent of emotional problems of karmic origin have cellular memory complications that will delay divine healing as a consequence of free will, even of the bodymind at a cellular level?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
414 views0 answers0 votes
In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) launched a trial to lower blood glucose levels in diabetic patients to reduce their risk for heart attack, stroke, or death from cardiovascular disease. The trial, called Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes, or ACCORD, involved over 10,000 Type 2 diabetic patients who had either been previously diagnosed with heart disease or had two or more risk factors for heart disease when they entered the study. Half received standard treatment and half were treated aggressively with higher doses of antidiabetic drugs. The trial was halted 18 months early because of a 26% increase in deaths in the aggressively treated group. The NIH said there was no conclusive link to a particular medication. Were these outcomes just a fluke or was over-medication involved? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
315 views0 answers0 votes
The diabetes drug rosiglitazone, sold under the trade name Avandia, has come under scrutiny. From 1999 to 2009, nearly 50,000 people on Avandia suffered heart attack, stroke, heart failure or death. In Europe, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended in September 2010 that the drug be suspended because the benefits no longer outweighed the risks.[10][11] It was withdrawn from the market in the UK, Spain and India in 2010,[12] and in New Zealand and South Africa in 2011. It is still being prescribed in the U.S. following a review of safety data by the FDA. Is this drug safe to use or are there cardiovascular risks? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
301 views0 answers0 votes
Is the Fusion Nano Circle from DEFY Labs as effective as claimed in giving pain relief to arthritis sufferers by delivering non-thermal far infrared energy topically? Does it help heal the underlying joint damage?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have noticed an ad that assigns hip pain to Gluteal Tendinopathy in women aged 50-75+ to low estrogen due to: Low estrogen after 50 disrupting collagen production – the protein that provides strength and elasticity for your tendons…Causing tendons to weaken and stiffen… leading to more stress and friction in the hip joint. It suggests a product called Provitalize to support hormonal balance and collagen production. Does Provitalize provide the benefits they claim? Could equal or better results be achieved through selected elements of the ingredients? Or another supplier?”
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
227 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank Flexafen in comparison to Collagenix-12, from Cerna Labs, or Collagen Plus from Advanced Bionutritionals, for helping arthritic hip symptoms and healing?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
216 views0 answers0 votes
How would you rank Provitalize in comparison to Collagenix-12, from Cerna Labs, or Collagen Plus from Advanced Bionutritionals, for helping arthritic hip symptoms and healing?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
Are clinical studies in less prominent foreign scientific journals more likely to be reliable than what is reported in major U.S. journals, due to less interloper interference with the studies or their interpretation?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
329 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “A man in the pest control business said that he had gotten several calls from different people in the past week about bats in their homes. He seemed perplexed by this phenomenon since bats in this climate should be hibernating through the winter. Additionally, I’ve seen multiple insects and it is barely February and still very cold. Is there something confusing these animals? If so, what? Is this related to the time reset, like some kind of animal Mandela effect? Or is it just a fluke?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
200 views0 answers0 votes
One of the reasons an atheist might cite for why they don’t believe in God, or at the very least a “loving God,” is the huge number of noxious species of microbial, plant, and animal life on this planet. There are so many that it is practically impossible to catalog them all, and new ones are being discovered on literally a DAILY basis. Scientists estimate the average somewhere between 40-55 new species are discovered each day. Certainly, a percentage of those could be labeled “noxious,” in that they are harmful to humans in some way, either directly or indirectly, through attacking another plant or animal species that is beneficial to humans. Of the 40-55 new species discovered each day, what rough percentage are truly NEW-to-Earth species that have been introduced just in the last decade? How big is this problem, and how long has it been going on? What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
470 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about the American Chestnut Tree: “By the 1940s the blight had killed an estimated four billion American chestnut trees nationwide. Where before about a third of all trees in the Smoky Mountains were chestnuts, today even single spindly saplings are rare.” The chestnut blight fungus was supposedly introduced from Asia accidently. To give people an idea of just how tragic this massive loss was, here is a brief description found on forestpathology.org of the value of the chestnut tree: “If you could custom design the ideal tree species, you couldn’t come up with a better one than American chestnut. It was a huge, majestic tree, with a very straight stem. The wood was nearly ideal. As George Hepting has written, ‘Not only was baby’s crib likely made of chestnut, but chances were, so was the old man’s coffin.’ One of its good qualities was high durability. The heartwood could be used in situations where decay was a hazard. The tree was common. It made up about 50% of most eastern hardwood forests. It grew fast and would regenerate itself by root sprouts vigorously. The nuts were edible, not only by wildlife but also by humans. It was an important food source for all. ‘The farmer’s hogs were fattened on chestnuts, and, to no small degree, his children were also.’ Chestnut was also prized as a landscape tree.” If indeed the blight did come from Asia, how long had it been in Asia, and what was its true origin? What can Creator tell us about the tragic loss of the American Chestnut?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
427 views0 answers0 votes
The National Park Service website nps.gov had this to say about Zebra Mussels: “Zebra mussels are small, freshwater, bivalve shellfish that were likely brought to the U.S. as stowaways in the ballast water of ships. They are native to the Caspian and Black Seas south of Russia and Ukraine, and have since become widespread in both Europe and the U.S.” The zebra mussel is a problem because it is so prolific. Each female can release up to a million eggs a year. “Biofouling is [an ecological problem] … Zebra mussels will attach to native mussels much like they do docks, boats, and water and power plant intake pipes, and in large enough numbers can prevent the natives from moving, feeding, reproducing, or regulating water properly. The zebra mussels also outcompete the natives for food and space, and because of their fast reproduction can quickly overwhelm a water system. The feeding habits of zebra mussels can also have a drastic impact on an infested lake. Zebra mussels are filter feeders that siphon particles of plankton from the water. They are highly efficient at this, and a large population of mussels can quickly clear the water of almost all floating particles. This change can cause shifts in local food webs, both by robbing food from native species that feed on plankton and also by increasing water clarity and thus making it easier for visual predators to hunt.” The costs to control and clean up zebra mussel infestations is enormous. And the problem never goes away, it can only be managed. This species is so good at causing problems, it couldn’t have been a truly native creature in the Black Sea either. It seems tailor-made for another WORLD and doesn’t belong here at ALL. What is Creator’s perspective, and what kind of environment is a good fit for this creature?
ClosedNicola asked 1 year ago • 
360 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1…89101112…36Next »
Ask Question