DWQA Questions › Tag: mass deception
Filter:AllOpenResolvedClosedUnanswered
There is a good joke that’s been around for a while, but it’s especially pertinent when it comes to evaluating AI: “It must be true, I read it on the Internet.” Everyone knows this means it’s more likely not to be true. But when it comes to AI, almost everything it “knows” comes from the Internet. And because it tends to weigh true and false by frequency of encounter, the more AI encounters the same images, assertions, statements, treatments, opinions, etc., the more statistically weighted it will be. The term, “There’s safety in numbers,” comes to mind in that the idea is, the more frequently something is encountered, the more genuine it probably is. This becomes AI’s “default assumption” about the material it is trained with. It can only utilize, evaluate, and regurgitate the material it is trained with. This turned out to be quite a problem early on because the sheer amount of racist, violent, and derogatory material on the Internet was not fully appreciated until AI started digesting it. It became necessary to employ untold thousands of low-paid (on the order of two dollars a day) “content evaluators,” mostly in third-world countries, to filter out gore, hate speech, child sexual abuse material, and pornographic images. If AI read it on the Internet, it must be true? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
173 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want wrote: “With LLMs (large language models), the situation is even worse than garbage in/garbage out – they will make paper-mache out of their training data, mushing it up and remixing it into new forms that don’t preserve the communicative intent of original data. Paper-mache made out of good data is still paper-mache.” They also write: “This is why we like to call language models (like popular chatbots) ‘synthetic text extruding machines.'” They also write: “In the case of language modeling, the correct answer of which word came next is just whatever word happened to come next in the training corpus. … So if (popular chatbots) are nothing more than souped-up autocomplete, why are so many people convinced that it’s actually ‘understanding’ and ‘reasoning?'” Why indeed? What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
91 views0 answers0 votes
Propaganda has always been a huge problem, but may be an even bigger issue for AI. China and the Chinese Communist Party spend more money and effort, and engage more of its citizens to spread blatantly false propaganda, than perhaps the rest of the world combined. To such an extent that it felt the need to create its very own global social media platform, TikTok. The Trump administration has even proposed banning TikTok altogether because of the nefarious role the platform plays in both gathering intelligence and spreading propaganda. Some of the lies people are starting to believe about China, that it has no crime, that its infrastructure is some of the most advanced and safest in the world, that there are no homeless people in China, that everyone there has a meaningful and lucrative job, that they are the healthiest and happiest people on the planet, and on and on. When, in fact, the exact opposite is more often than not the case. And for every good lie they tell about themselves, they tell an equally bad one about America and Europe. The problem is, they are so prolific and extreme with this propaganda that the Chinese people themselves believe none of it (about themselves, anyway), and Americans and Europeans (especially young ones) are beginning to believe all of it. With AI having no way to filter this for truth or falsity other than volume, there appears to be a genuine danger of AI itself presenting this propaganda as gospel truth, that China is great and America and Europe are evil. What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
203 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference, suggest that the track record of AI used for predicting social outcomes is so abysmally bad that it may actually amount to fraud. They write: “In short, some existing limits to predictability could be overcome with more and better data, while others seem intrinsic (built in and unfixable). In some cases, such as cultural products (like resume scanning AI, or AI used to decide who gets social benefits), we don’t expect predictability to get much better at all. In others, such as predicting individuals’ life outcomes, there could be some improvements but not drastic changes. Unfortunately, this hasn’t stopped companies from selling AI for making consequential decisions about people by predicting their future. So it is important to resist AI snake oil that’s already in wide use today rather than passively hope that predictive AI technology will get better.” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
103 views0 answers0 votes
The authors of both books [The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want and AI Snake Oil: What Artificial Intelligence Can Do, What It Can’t, and How to Tell the Difference] were not the least bit concerned that AI presented an immediate or near-term existential threat to humanity in any way, shape, or form, despite copious media hype to the contrary. All the authors, on the other hand, were VERY concerned about the misuse of AI to reduce our freedom and agency to choose for ourselves, to retain the rights to our creative outputs, and even to have recourse when AI decides wrongly (which they assert it is guaranteed to do). Can Creator tell us how Empowered Prayer, the Lightworker Healing Protocol, Deep Subconscious Mind Reset, and Divine Life Support are the best ways to combat the danger and encroachment of AI in our lives?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
106 views0 answers0 votes
Has there been any change in the ET planned sequence for the financial collapse triggered by the tidal power outages, then gold reset, then Alien Disclosure, and then withdrawal of the interlopers?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
242 views0 answers0 votes
Does it look like the financial collapse, tidal power outages, gold reset, and then Alien Disclosure will start soon now, or has there been a significant delay for some reason since I last asked about this?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
319 views0 answers0 votes
A viewer asks: “I have some ability and interest in doing more remote viewing. Before remote viewing is it possible to ask Creator to “protect and shield me from other beings, and limit my reach when needed to keep me from harm or being noticed.” Can Creator ‘limit’ my reach if requested? If not, would a request to be provided a warning be appropriate? Even with these safeguards, is it too dangerous to view events involving the ETs?”
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
172 views0 answers0 votes
You have told us a major reason for the delays in not yet seeing the tidal power outages, gold reset, and Alien Disclosure is to plan and execute a truly major financial collapse as a painful motivation for human acceptance of the Alien Disclosure with their deceptive offer to help. Is an additional reason for extra time being needed that they want to feel smug and secure while they take their temporary break in withdrawing from our world, knowing we will be decimated and suffering, ideally, the whole time they are on a multi-year vacation? That might well require much more detailed planning and orchestration to optimize. What can Creator tell us?
ClosedNicola asked 3 months ago • 
201 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Is Artificial Intelligence (AI) fully an ET creation? Or did some form of ancient AI exist before the creation of physical ETs and affect them somehow? Is there any other origin of AI from another timeline, dimension, or reality affecting ETs that is also affecting humanity? How important will Organic Intelligence from nature and humanity and the divine be in coming times with Artificial Intelligence on the rise (before Ascension perhaps)?” What is Creator’s perspective?
ClosedNicola asked 4 months ago • 
221 views0 answers0 votes
A practitioner asks: “Are Grok or other AI platforms intended to gather and distill all human knowledge? Do they all feed into the AI systems of the interlopers?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
397 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does this intention for AI include using the information gathered to target human sources of designated objectionable material?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
320 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Does sharing information from and about Get Wisdom make such users vulnerable in the hands of AI platforms?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
218 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Is a further intention behind AI systems to coerce humans into relying on AI for all information and abandon any individual intuition, analysis or creativity?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
316 views0 answers0 votes
She asks: “Are users of AI platforms receiving encouraging programming to make them feel of superior intellect and insight to those who don’t?”
ClosedNicola asked 6 months ago • 
177 views0 answers0 votes
« Previous1234…16Next »
Ask Question